Re: [問題] 被誤鎖補償已回收
※ 引述《VVVV5555 (東興烏鴉-耀揚哥)》之銘言:
: 大家可以先來討論一下
: 這次大概會有什麼補償嘍
: 因為感覺很多玩家被亂鎖
: 雖然有些真的是用外掛
: 但多多少少會有一些是真的被錶了
: 不只石頭沒了 關卡沒過 體力空了 還不能玩
: 簡直欺負人
: 一人送五張人面鳥外加三十石可以消消氣
: 還好我上次就打過了
: 真是氣死我了
看到那麼多人說被誤鎖
原本我認為官方誤判的成份居多
不過前幾天看到「王者的掠奪」開始有排行榜之後
就很難讓人相信那些被鎖的玩家全都是清白的
之前月狼就有傳出很多人被誤鎖
既然知道官方可能會誤鎖
怕被鎖帳號的人為何這次不錄影預防被誤鎖時當作可證明自己清白的證據?
Google只能找到玩家被鎖的文章
但似乎找不到有人全程錄影 沒開掛的情況下被鎖的影片
這樣子說被鎖真的會讓人質疑誤鎖事件的真實性
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 36.227.254.31
→
10/02 08:08, , 1F
10/02 08:08, 1F
→
10/02 08:08, , 2F
10/02 08:08, 2F
→
10/02 08:09, , 3F
10/02 08:09, 3F
推
10/02 08:09, , 4F
10/02 08:09, 4F
噓
10/02 08:10, , 5F
10/02 08:10, 5F
→
10/02 08:10, , 6F
10/02 08:10, 6F
當然不是說非錄影不可 只是如果倒楣遇到被官方亂鎖
有影片的話不是可以好好婊官方根本是亂來的嗎?
※ 編輯: james7923 來自: 36.227.254.31 (10/02 08:15)
噓
10/02 08:13, , 7F
10/02 08:13, 7F
※ 編輯: james7923 來自: 36.227.254.31 (10/02 08:15)
噓
10/02 08:15, , 8F
10/02 08:15, 8F
→
10/02 08:16, , 9F
10/02 08:16, 9F
→
10/02 08:16, , 10F
10/02 08:16, 10F
噓
10/02 08:17, , 11F
10/02 08:17, 11F
→
10/02 08:17, , 12F
10/02 08:17, 12F
→
10/02 08:17, , 13F
10/02 08:17, 13F
→
10/02 08:18, , 14F
10/02 08:18, 14F
→
10/02 08:18, , 15F
10/02 08:18, 15F
→
10/02 08:18, , 16F
10/02 08:18, 16F
→
10/02 08:19, , 17F
10/02 08:19, 17F
推
10/02 08:22, , 18F
10/02 08:22, 18F
→
10/02 08:22, , 19F
10/02 08:22, 19F
噓
10/02 08:23, , 20F
10/02 08:23, 20F
→
10/02 08:27, , 21F
10/02 08:27, 21F
噓
10/02 08:28, , 22F
10/02 08:28, 22F
→
10/02 08:29, , 23F
10/02 08:29, 23F
→
10/02 08:29, , 24F
10/02 08:29, 24F
→
10/02 08:29, , 25F
10/02 08:29, 25F
→
10/02 08:30, , 26F
10/02 08:30, 26F
噓
10/02 08:32, , 27F
10/02 08:32, 27F
噓
10/02 08:33, , 28F
10/02 08:33, 28F
噓
10/02 08:34, , 29F
10/02 08:34, 29F
→
10/02 08:35, , 30F
10/02 08:35, 30F
→
10/02 08:35, , 31F
10/02 08:35, 31F
噓
10/02 08:36, , 32F
10/02 08:36, 32F
噓
10/02 08:39, , 33F
10/02 08:39, 33F
推
10/02 08:40, , 34F
10/02 08:40, 34F
噓
10/02 08:46, , 35F
10/02 08:46, 35F
噓
10/02 08:47, , 36F
10/02 08:47, 36F
噓
10/02 08:48, , 37F
10/02 08:48, 37F
噓
10/02 08:49, , 38F
10/02 08:49, 38F
→
10/02 08:51, , 39F
10/02 08:51, 39F
→
10/02 08:52, , 40F
10/02 08:52, 40F
→
10/02 09:02, , 41F
10/02 09:02, 41F
噓
10/02 09:04, , 42F
10/02 09:04, 42F
推
10/02 09:08, , 43F
10/02 09:08, 43F
噓
10/02 09:09, , 44F
10/02 09:09, 44F
噓
10/02 09:13, , 45F
10/02 09:13, 45F
噓
10/02 09:20, , 46F
10/02 09:20, 46F
噓
10/02 09:21, , 47F
10/02 09:21, 47F
噓
10/02 09:34, , 48F
10/02 09:34, 48F
推
10/02 09:37, , 49F
10/02 09:37, 49F
噓
10/02 09:43, , 50F
10/02 09:43, 50F
→
10/02 09:43, , 51F
10/02 09:43, 51F
→
10/02 09:54, , 52F
10/02 09:54, 52F
推
10/02 09:55, , 53F
10/02 09:55, 53F
噓
10/02 09:56, , 54F
10/02 09:56, 54F
推
10/02 09:57, , 55F
10/02 09:57, 55F
→
10/02 09:58, , 56F
10/02 09:58, 56F
推
10/02 10:08, , 57F
10/02 10:08, 57F
噓
10/02 10:30, , 58F
10/02 10:30, 58F
推
10/02 10:34, , 59F
10/02 10:34, 59F
→
10/02 10:34, , 60F
10/02 10:34, 60F
→
10/02 10:47, , 61F
10/02 10:47, 61F
推
10/02 10:55, , 62F
10/02 10:55, 62F
→
10/02 10:55, , 63F
10/02 10:55, 63F
推
10/02 11:14, , 64F
10/02 11:14, 64F
噓
10/02 11:14, , 65F
10/02 11:14, 65F
→
10/02 11:16, , 66F
10/02 11:16, 66F
→
10/02 11:22, , 67F
10/02 11:22, 67F
推
10/02 11:26, , 68F
10/02 11:26, 68F
→
10/02 11:27, , 69F
10/02 11:27, 69F
推
10/02 11:27, , 70F
10/02 11:27, 70F
→
10/02 11:46, , 71F
10/02 11:46, 71F
噓
10/02 11:51, , 72F
10/02 11:51, 72F
噓
10/02 12:07, , 73F
10/02 12:07, 73F
→
10/02 12:09, , 74F
10/02 12:09, 74F
→
10/02 12:38, , 75F
10/02 12:38, 75F
→
10/02 12:39, , 76F
10/02 12:39, 76F
→
10/02 13:13, , 77F
10/02 13:13, 77F
→
10/02 13:14, , 78F
10/02 13:14, 78F
→
10/02 13:14, , 79F
10/02 13:14, 79F
→
10/02 13:15, , 80F
10/02 13:15, 80F
→
10/02 13:17, , 81F
10/02 13:17, 81F
噓
10/02 13:24, , 82F
10/02 13:24, 82F
噓
10/02 13:32, , 83F
10/02 13:32, 83F
噓
10/02 14:02, , 84F
10/02 14:02, 84F
噓
10/02 14:42, , 85F
10/02 14:42, 85F
噓
10/02 14:50, , 86F
10/02 14:50, 86F
噓
10/02 14:53, , 87F
10/02 14:53, 87F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
問題
-17
35
以下文章回應了本文:
問題
58
117
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 6 篇):
問題
-17
35
問題
-20
87
問題
58
117
問題
38
71
問題
19
63
問題
-11
44