Re: [轉錄]第11顆種子掉落--9 韓娃
: At 5:2 Hantuchova played well she hit 3 clean winners pass Harleroad,
: Hantuchova was the one who is dictating the play, it is either she make
: winner or missed the line completely.
嗯不過那時很明顯可以看的出來Harkleroad章法都打亂了. 讓Hantuchova重新把穩定性
找回來.
: Harleroad is more of defensive player in the mode of Clijsters, she is not
: a shotmaker as Hantuchova is, when on song Hantuchova is simply beautiful to
: watch. By her own standard Hantuchova did play badly, she simply did not have
: any consistancy in her game to win the match but she was close. 101 errors
: in a 3 hours and 3 sets match is not acceptable by any standard, think this
: way 101 errors equals 2.65 points in every game to your opponent,so you always
: start at 0:30 on your service game and 30:0 on your opponets service game.
: So there is no question Hantuchova played a bad match. A bad match is not
: indicated by the closeness of the result but what a player did over the
: length of thematch.
: by jliang
嗯Hantuchova的確沒有打出最佳水準但是並沒有那麼差,她沒失誤時打的出來的球也是都
很漂亮. 所以我不覺得她是打得極差.
至於關於數據的問題,今年法網每一場的UE都非常多,所以我是覺得認定上有一點問題.
不可否認的Hantuchova失誤是很多,但是我覺得是沒到100多個errros那麼多. 以數據來
看Harkleroad全場總共拿到133分,官網上紀錄106個UE加上Harkleroad本身16個winner
外加Hantuchova的6個雙發失誤,計算下來Harkleroad變成只有5分是forced errors,
我個人覺得是不太可能的...
總之我是覺得Hantuchova打的是不好但是沒有極糟糕,全場還有42個winners.
by zerkchu
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 61.64.102.194
※ 編輯: establish 來自: 61.64.102.194 (05/29 14:10)
推
推 61.64.102.194 05/29, , 1F
推 61.64.102.194 05/29, 1F
推
推 203.219.101.22 05/29, , 2F
推 203.219.101.22 05/29, 2F
推
推 61.64.102.194 05/29, , 3F
推 61.64.102.194 05/29, 3F
推
推 61.64.102.194 05/29, , 4F
推 61.64.102.194 05/29, 4F
推
推140.112.120.213 05/29, , 5F
推140.112.120.213 05/29, 5F
推
推 61.64.102.194 05/29, , 6F
推 61.64.102.194 05/29, 6F
推
推 203.219.101.22 05/29, , 7F
推 203.219.101.22 05/29, 7F
推
推 203.219.101.22 05/29, , 8F
推 203.219.101.22 05/29, 8F
討論串 (同標題文章)