[請益] 為什麼一定要找到offer才能提離職?消失
我一直覺得這樣很奇怪
可以先跟公司談 談不攏在去找就好
但一堆人說 這樣就黑了
那如果先去找 好不容易談好薪 公司留 結果又留下來 不就白找
為何不能大家當做正常的商品買賣
取相對好的 公司認為妳太貴 就不會留
妳認為公司太便宜 就不會去
去個相對值 何必先找後談 怪哉
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.240.248.226
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1486651058.A.2D4.html
推
02/09 22:39, , 1F
02/09 22:39, 1F
直接虎說外面月薪多1萬 年薪多20萬?
※ 編輯: sustaned (111.240.248.226), 02/09/2017 22:41:27
推
02/09 22:42, , 2F
02/09 22:42, 2F
推
02/09 22:42, , 3F
02/09 22:42, 3F
→
02/09 22:42, , 4F
02/09 22:42, 4F
推
02/09 22:42, , 5F
02/09 22:42, 5F
推
02/09 22:43, , 6F
02/09 22:43, 6F
→
02/09 22:43, , 7F
02/09 22:43, 7F
→
02/09 22:44, , 8F
02/09 22:44, 8F
→
02/09 22:45, , 9F
02/09 22:45, 9F
→
02/09 22:45, , 10F
02/09 22:45, 10F
噓
02/09 22:46, , 11F
02/09 22:46, 11F
→
02/09 22:46, , 12F
02/09 22:46, 12F
→
02/09 22:46, , 13F
02/09 22:46, 13F
推
02/09 22:49, , 14F
02/09 22:49, 14F
推
02/09 22:49, , 15F
02/09 22:49, 15F
→
02/09 22:50, , 16F
02/09 22:50, 16F
噓
02/09 22:50, , 17F
02/09 22:50, 17F
噓
02/09 22:54, , 18F
02/09 22:54, 18F
噓
02/09 22:54, , 19F
02/09 22:54, 19F
推
02/09 22:54, , 20F
02/09 22:54, 20F
→
02/09 22:55, , 21F
02/09 22:55, 21F
→
02/09 22:55, , 22F
02/09 22:55, 22F
→
02/09 22:56, , 23F
02/09 22:56, 23F
→
02/09 23:06, , 24F
02/09 23:06, 24F
噓
02/09 23:10, , 25F
02/09 23:10, 25F
推
02/09 23:13, , 26F
02/09 23:13, 26F
噓
02/09 23:24, , 27F
02/09 23:24, 27F
噓
02/09 23:38, , 28F
02/09 23:38, 28F
→
02/09 23:38, , 29F
02/09 23:38, 29F
→
02/09 23:42, , 30F
02/09 23:42, 30F
噓
02/09 23:53, , 31F
02/09 23:53, 31F
噓
02/10 00:16, , 32F
02/10 00:16, 32F
→
02/10 00:16, , 33F
02/10 00:16, 33F
噓
02/10 00:17, , 34F
02/10 00:17, 34F
→
02/10 00:17, , 35F
02/10 00:17, 35F
→
02/10 00:18, , 36F
02/10 00:18, 36F
→
02/10 00:22, , 37F
02/10 00:22, 37F
→
02/10 00:22, , 38F
02/10 00:22, 38F
→
02/10 00:22, , 39F
02/10 00:22, 39F
→
02/10 00:24, , 40F
02/10 00:24, 40F
噓
02/10 00:28, , 41F
02/10 00:28, 41F
推
02/10 00:29, , 42F
02/10 00:29, 42F
→
02/10 00:36, , 43F
02/10 00:36, 43F
→
02/10 01:37, , 44F
02/10 01:37, 44F
→
02/10 01:38, , 45F
02/10 01:38, 45F
→
02/10 01:38, , 46F
02/10 01:38, 46F
→
02/10 08:41, , 47F
02/10 08:41, 47F
→
02/10 08:56, , 48F
02/10 08:56, 48F
噓
02/10 08:58, , 49F
02/10 08:58, 49F
→
02/10 08:58, , 50F
02/10 08:58, 50F
→
02/10 08:58, , 51F
02/10 08:58, 51F
噓
02/10 09:07, , 52F
02/10 09:07, 52F
噓
02/10 10:02, , 53F
02/10 10:02, 53F
推
02/10 10:52, , 54F
02/10 10:52, 54F
噓
02/10 11:00, , 55F
02/10 11:00, 55F
→
02/10 11:20, , 56F
02/10 11:20, 56F
噓
02/10 12:00, , 57F
02/10 12:00, 57F
噓
02/10 13:30, , 58F
02/10 13:30, 58F
→
02/10 13:30, , 59F
02/10 13:30, 59F
→
02/10 13:38, , 60F
02/10 13:38, 60F
→
02/10 17:26, , 61F
02/10 17:26, 61F
→
02/10 20:05, , 62F
02/10 20:05, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):