[討論] 會後悔進科技業嗎?
以前的科技業會稱為科技新貴
不只是因為月薪比較高的關係
實際上大多的收入都是來自所謂的暗盤
也就是分紅+獎金+績效
通常這些領下來會比12個月薪水加起來的還多
但是這幾年演變下來,所謂的暗盤似乎越來越少
也有很多家擺明就是沒暗盤,純領月薪
而且一堆公司開價就是大學30K起跳,不爽不要做
只是這樣一來變得相當糟糕
尤其是跟公務人員比起來更慘
就拿高中畢業就能考的普考來比較
只要能考上就有35K,還有2個月的年終
如果公司沒暗盤而只有月薪的話
科技業後段已經變得比高中生公務員還不如
會有人後悔進科技業嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.84.183.170
推
09/09 15:09, , 1F
09/09 15:09, 1F
→
09/09 15:10, , 2F
09/09 15:10, 2F
推
09/09 15:15, , 3F
09/09 15:15, 3F
推
09/09 15:16, , 4F
09/09 15:16, 4F
→
09/09 15:16, , 5F
09/09 15:16, 5F
推
09/09 15:16, , 6F
09/09 15:16, 6F
→
09/09 15:18, , 7F
09/09 15:18, 7F
→
09/09 15:20, , 8F
09/09 15:20, 8F
推
09/09 15:22, , 9F
09/09 15:22, 9F
→
09/09 15:26, , 10F
09/09 15:26, 10F
推
09/09 15:26, , 11F
09/09 15:26, 11F
→
09/09 15:27, , 12F
09/09 15:27, 12F
→
09/09 15:28, , 13F
09/09 15:28, 13F
推
09/09 15:28, , 14F
09/09 15:28, 14F
推
09/09 15:31, , 15F
09/09 15:31, 15F
推
09/09 15:33, , 16F
09/09 15:33, 16F
推
09/09 15:34, , 17F
09/09 15:34, 17F
→
09/09 15:37, , 18F
09/09 15:37, 18F
推
09/09 15:39, , 19F
09/09 15:39, 19F
→
09/09 15:39, , 20F
09/09 15:39, 20F
推
09/09 15:40, , 21F
09/09 15:40, 21F
推
09/09 15:44, , 22F
09/09 15:44, 22F
→
09/09 15:46, , 23F
09/09 15:46, 23F
→
09/09 15:47, , 24F
09/09 15:47, 24F
→
09/09 15:47, , 25F
09/09 15:47, 25F
推
09/09 15:55, , 26F
09/09 15:55, 26F
→
09/09 15:55, , 27F
09/09 15:55, 27F
推
09/09 15:56, , 28F
09/09 15:56, 28F
→
09/09 15:58, , 29F
09/09 15:58, 29F
→
09/09 15:58, , 30F
09/09 15:58, 30F
→
09/09 15:59, , 31F
09/09 15:59, 31F
→
09/09 15:59, , 32F
09/09 15:59, 32F
推
09/09 16:39, , 33F
09/09 16:39, 33F
推
09/09 16:45, , 34F
09/09 16:45, 34F
推
09/09 16:46, , 35F
09/09 16:46, 35F
推
09/09 16:47, , 36F
09/09 16:47, 36F
→
09/09 16:48, , 37F
09/09 16:48, 37F
推
09/09 16:52, , 38F
09/09 16:52, 38F
→
09/09 16:54, , 39F
09/09 16:54, 39F
推
09/09 17:05, , 40F
09/09 17:05, 40F
推
09/09 17:13, , 41F
09/09 17:13, 41F
推
09/09 17:15, , 42F
09/09 17:15, 42F
推
09/09 17:27, , 43F
09/09 17:27, 43F
推
09/09 17:38, , 44F
09/09 17:38, 44F
推
09/09 17:39, , 45F
09/09 17:39, 45F
→
09/09 17:52, , 46F
09/09 17:52, 46F
推
09/09 17:58, , 47F
09/09 17:58, 47F
→
09/09 17:59, , 48F
09/09 17:59, 48F
推
09/09 18:38, , 49F
09/09 18:38, 49F
推
09/09 18:40, , 50F
09/09 18:40, 50F
→
09/09 18:41, , 51F
09/09 18:41, 51F
推
09/09 18:51, , 52F
09/09 18:51, 52F
推
09/09 19:51, , 53F
09/09 19:51, 53F
推
09/09 19:55, , 54F
09/09 19:55, 54F
推
09/09 20:17, , 55F
09/09 20:17, 55F
推
09/09 20:24, , 56F
09/09 20:24, 56F
→
09/09 20:24, , 57F
09/09 20:24, 57F
→
09/09 20:24, , 58F
09/09 20:24, 58F
→
09/09 20:25, , 59F
09/09 20:25, 59F
推
09/09 20:30, , 60F
09/09 20:30, 60F
推
09/09 20:52, , 61F
09/09 20:52, 61F
推
09/09 20:55, , 62F
09/09 20:55, 62F
→
09/09 20:55, , 63F
09/09 20:55, 63F
→
09/09 20:56, , 64F
09/09 20:56, 64F
→
09/09 21:11, , 65F
09/09 21:11, 65F
推
09/09 21:52, , 66F
09/09 21:52, 66F
推
09/10 00:47, , 67F
09/10 00:47, 67F
推
09/10 02:08, , 68F
09/10 02:08, 68F
推
09/10 05:08, , 69F
09/10 05:08, 69F
推
09/10 11:05, , 70F
09/10 11:05, 70F
推
09/10 11:31, , 71F
09/10 11:31, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
討論
13
19
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 10 篇):
討論
43
71
討論
10
30
討論
32
134
討論
83
198
討論
4
26
討論
105
483
討論
7
26
討論
13
19
討論
-3
11