[新聞] 教部:導師費已包括用餐指導費 2012-2-11
教部:導師費已包括用餐指導費 2012-2-11
〔記者林曉雲、胡清暉、邱紹雯、翁聿煌/綜合報導〕教育部昨天邀地方縣市及教師、家
長、校長團體等開會,教育部認為,陪學生吃營養午餐、站交通導護都是中小學教師的工
作內容,且現有每月三千元的導師費已包括用餐指導費,對於目前有六成縣市另加發數百
元不等的用餐指導費,未來希望地方政府能調整。
教育部體育司長王俊權表示,指導學生午餐經決議認為應歸列為導師工作事項,導師費(
明年可望增加為四千元)也含括了午餐指導工作,部分地方政府有意另行加碼發放用餐指
導費或其他名稱的費用,教育部予以尊重,不過未來希望能做調整。
至於交通導護一事,教育部國教司長黃子騰表示,將邀交通、警政等中央單位開會研訂作
業規範,不過教育部也將推動修改教師法,將交通導護列為教師工作內容,在未修法前,
縣市政府可訂在教師聘約準則中規範。
台北市教育局主秘何雅娟說,台北市今年的午餐指導費預算已經編列,只針對國小供餐學
校補助,因應明年導師費提高,將再研議是否取消午餐指導費。至於導護工作,認同教育
部的解釋及做法。
新北市教育局也表示,仍會編列午餐指導費,直到教師工時與項目守則達成共識後,會遵
照辦理。導護工作部分,在教師工作守則未明訂前,市府會以跨局處的方式,共同研商確
保學童上下學安全的最佳做法。
教育部昨也確認,正式專任教師及代理教師不得在校外從事補習、家教等活動,兼任、代
課及教學支援工作人員則不受限制,不過若有鐘點教師利用職務之便,媒介、推銷或收取
不當利益,或洩漏、公開有關評量試題內容的相關資訊等,則將予以解聘。
全國教師工會總聯合會副理事長吳忠泰認為,營養午餐、交通導護是否納入老師工作項目
仍待釐清,國中小導師喪失自由用餐權利,若雇主有意支付誤餐費,外界不該污名化。
新聞來源:自由時報
http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/feb/11/today-life3.htm
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.112.242.68
推
02/11 08:56, , 1F
02/11 08:56, 1F
推
02/11 09:45, , 2F
02/11 09:45, 2F
噓
02/11 10:11, , 3F
02/11 10:11, 3F
噓
02/11 10:18, , 4F
02/11 10:18, 4F
→
02/11 10:24, , 5F
02/11 10:24, 5F
→
02/11 10:35, , 6F
02/11 10:35, 6F
→
02/11 10:35, , 7F
02/11 10:35, 7F
噓
02/11 10:37, , 8F
02/11 10:37, 8F
→
02/11 10:39, , 9F
02/11 10:39, 9F
推
02/11 10:58, , 10F
02/11 10:58, 10F
→
02/11 10:59, , 11F
02/11 10:59, 11F
→
02/11 11:00, , 12F
02/11 11:00, 12F
→
02/11 11:01, , 13F
02/11 11:01, 13F
→
02/11 11:03, , 14F
02/11 11:03, 14F
推
02/11 11:11, , 15F
02/11 11:11, 15F
→
02/11 11:11, , 16F
02/11 11:11, 16F
→
02/11 11:11, , 17F
02/11 11:11, 17F
→
02/11 11:12, , 18F
02/11 11:12, 18F
→
02/11 11:12, , 19F
02/11 11:12, 19F
推
02/11 11:26, , 20F
02/11 11:26, 20F
→
02/11 11:27, , 21F
02/11 11:27, 21F
→
02/11 11:28, , 22F
02/11 11:28, 22F
推
02/11 11:32, , 23F
02/11 11:32, 23F
→
02/11 11:36, , 24F
02/11 11:36, 24F
→
02/11 11:37, , 25F
02/11 11:37, 25F
→
02/11 11:38, , 26F
02/11 11:38, 26F
→
02/11 11:39, , 27F
02/11 11:39, 27F
推
02/11 11:39, , 28F
02/11 11:39, 28F
→
02/11 11:39, , 29F
02/11 11:39, 29F
→
02/11 11:40, , 30F
02/11 11:40, 30F
推
02/11 11:54, , 31F
02/11 11:54, 31F
→
02/11 11:59, , 32F
02/11 11:59, 32F
推
02/11 12:27, , 33F
02/11 12:27, 33F
推
02/11 12:27, , 34F
02/11 12:27, 34F
→
02/11 12:31, , 35F
02/11 12:31, 35F
→
02/11 12:32, , 36F
02/11 12:32, 36F
噓
02/11 12:35, , 37F
02/11 12:35, 37F
→
02/11 12:36, , 38F
02/11 12:36, 38F
→
02/11 12:37, , 39F
02/11 12:37, 39F
噓
02/11 12:39, , 40F
02/11 12:39, 40F
→
02/11 12:40, , 41F
02/11 12:40, 41F
→
02/11 12:43, , 42F
02/11 12:43, 42F
→
02/11 12:43, , 43F
02/11 12:43, 43F
噓
02/11 12:53, , 44F
02/11 12:53, 44F
→
02/11 12:54, , 45F
02/11 12:54, 45F
→
02/11 12:55, , 46F
02/11 12:55, 46F
→
02/11 12:55, , 47F
02/11 12:55, 47F
→
02/11 12:55, , 48F
02/11 12:55, 48F
→
02/11 12:56, , 49F
02/11 12:56, 49F
→
02/11 12:57, , 50F
02/11 12:57, 50F
→
02/11 12:58, , 51F
02/11 12:58, 51F
→
02/11 13:13, , 52F
02/11 13:13, 52F
噓
02/11 13:45, , 53F
02/11 13:45, 53F
※ ha97:轉錄至看板 studyteacher 02/11 14:38
推
02/11 14:43, , 54F
02/11 14:43, 54F
→
02/11 15:53, , 55F
02/11 15:53, 55F
→
02/11 16:28, , 56F
02/11 16:28, 56F
→
02/11 17:12, , 57F
02/11 17:12, 57F
→
02/11 17:14, , 58F
02/11 17:14, 58F
→
02/11 17:43, , 59F
02/11 17:43, 59F
→
02/11 17:43, , 60F
02/11 17:43, 60F
→
02/11 17:44, , 61F
02/11 17:44, 61F
→
02/11 17:45, , 62F
02/11 17:45, 62F
噓
02/11 18:28, , 63F
02/11 18:28, 63F
推
02/11 20:20, , 64F
02/11 20:20, 64F
噓
02/11 20:32, , 65F
02/11 20:32, 65F
推
02/11 20:52, , 66F
02/11 20:52, 66F
推
02/11 21:13, , 67F
02/11 21:13, 67F
→
02/11 21:49, , 68F
02/11 21:49, 68F
噓
02/11 22:02, , 69F
02/11 22:02, 69F
→
02/11 22:04, , 70F
02/11 22:04, 70F
推
02/12 00:37, , 71F
02/12 00:37, 71F
→
02/12 00:38, , 72F
02/12 00:38, 72F
推
02/12 00:46, , 73F
02/12 00:46, 73F
→
02/12 02:53, , 74F
02/12 02:53, 74F
→
02/12 15:58, , 75F
02/12 15:58, 75F
→
02/12 15:59, , 76F
02/12 15:59, 76F
噓
02/13 11:27, , 77F
02/13 11:27, 77F
→
02/13 11:28, , 78F
02/13 11:28, 78F
噓
02/13 14:12, , 79F
02/13 14:12, 79F
推
02/13 20:04, , 80F
02/13 20:04, 80F
推
02/15 21:10, , 81F
02/15 21:10, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):