[請益] 整合寫作

看板TOEFL_iBT作者 (呵呵)時間13年前 (2011/02/10 01:20), 編輯推噓2(200)
留言2則, 2人參與, 最新討論串8/12 (看更多)
想請問一下,整合寫作是寫的愈詳細愈好(300~350字,當然是以寫的完為前提) 還是一定要整理到大綱才會高分? 因為我看板上某大提供的滿分範例,作者都講的非常大綱... 幾乎是一點細節都沒提到 所以我在擔心,如果寫太詳細,只是換句話說或抽換字面,會不會反而被扣分!! 下面是其中一篇大綱版的例子:(如果po這個不適合請告知..我等等馬上刪) TPO 5 The author of the reading passage proposes three theories as likely explanations of the primary function of Chaco Canyon houses, grant structures built in the I2th century. The lecturer, however, points to the inaccuracies in each of these theories. The lecturer argues that the modest number of fireplaces in these structures is in contradiction with the huge size of these houses, indicating that these structures could not have been used for Residential purposes. The Reading, however, draws comparisons between the Chaco houses and other similar large Residential structures in support of the "Residential" theory. The second theory, that the houses were used for food storage, is also rejected by the lecturer. He explains that a place that had been used for storing maize would have many traces of scattered Maize, which is not the case in the area of the Chaco Canyon houses. This proves that the "food storage theory" is unlikely. Finally, regarding the third theory, the "ceremony theory'', the lecturer contends that the presence of broken pots close to the great houses does not offer sufficient proof that this was a place for ceremonial activities. He argues that there are other materials such as pieces of construction trash found along with the broken pots, which suggest that these pots were probably not used for ceremonial purposes but instead were discarded by construction workers upon completion of the great houses. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.248.149

02/10 11:10, , 1F
整合寫這麼多 似乎已經脫離"摘要"的原意了
02/10 11:10, 1F

02/10 11:53, , 2F
整合字數不是150~225嗎?
02/10 11:53, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #1DKip9P3 (TOEFL_iBT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1DKip9P3 (TOEFL_iBT)