Re: [問卦] 豆腐三重奏是有多好吃?
※ 引述《ccs95209 (嗚嗚啦啦)》之銘言:
: ※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1LHED0aE ]
: 作者: KingKingCold (お元気ですか?私元気です) 看板: Gossiping
: 標題: Re: [問卦] 豆腐三重奏是有多好吃?
: 時間: Sat May 2 22:46:20 2015
: ※ 引述《saintlin (saintlin)》之銘言:
: : 豆腐三重奏 說穿就是麵 肉 也都是豆腐
: : 整道菜就是吃豆腐 除了奇特一點會有比
: : 較好吃到那嗎 那些評審各各吃了好像
: : 上天堂 現實中做個豆腐炒麵出來 就
: : 只是一直吃豆腐誰會覺得好吃 有這八卦
: : 嗎
: 幹妳娘,紹安根本就是被張大人給陰了。
其實應該說,不只是紹安,連解師傅也被張大人給陰了!
看看紹安輸的理由是什麼,獨創性!
我想請問張大人,你前三場比賽時有拿這當評分標準?
第一場湯的對決,三傑的彈跳甲魚湯有獨創性無誤
但第二場饅頭對決時,有依照獨創性給分扣分?
那麵點王的四神海鮮八寶包子是哪裡有獨創性?
白羅家代代相傳的包子,獨創性在哪?
解師傅雖然是抄襲北方的炸包子,但至少還懂得加上自己創意改良
而羅根呢,就只是把祖傳包子給拿出來用而已
當你張大人拿所謂傳統的盾與創新的矛來講這狗屁矛盾的故事時
怎就沒因為羅根的包子沒有獨創性而把分數給解師傅
只能說這些個裁判根本只是在找理由,看來真的很不喜歡臉傷或身上有疤的人
駱可臉上有疤-失格
解師父臉上有疤-不給你分
紹安全身都有疤-還是不給你分
張大人,其實你真的很討厭有疤的人對吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.63.104.7
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Suckcomic/M.1430665538.A.DDF.html
推
05/03 23:07, , 1F
05/03 23:07, 1F
→
05/03 23:08, , 2F
05/03 23:08, 2F
推
05/03 23:08, , 3F
05/03 23:08, 3F
解師傅是在炸包子這理論上,再加上他自己的創意,在裡頭塞冬粉跟牛肉塊
要不然直接拿北方炸包子出來就好,還讓它笑幹嗎
→
05/03 23:08, , 4F
05/03 23:08, 4F
問題在於裁判啊!獨創性與普遍性是裁判自己說的
結果在面對沒有獨創性的四神海鮮八寶包子時,卻沒有因此把分數給解師傅
※ 編輯: aa1052026 (61.63.104.7), 05/03/2015 23:11:03
推
05/03 23:12, , 5F
05/03 23:12, 5F
推
05/03 23:12, , 6F
05/03 23:12, 6F
→
05/03 23:13, , 7F
05/03 23:13, 7F
→
05/03 23:13, , 8F
05/03 23:13, 8F
→
05/03 23:14, , 9F
05/03 23:14, 9F
推
05/03 23:14, , 10F
05/03 23:14, 10F
→
05/03 23:15, , 11F
05/03 23:15, 11F
推
05/03 23:15, , 12F
05/03 23:15, 12F
→
05/03 23:16, , 13F
05/03 23:16, 13F
→
05/03 23:16, , 14F
05/03 23:16, 14F
推
05/03 23:16, , 15F
05/03 23:16, 15F
→
05/03 23:17, , 16F
05/03 23:17, 16F
→
05/03 23:17, , 17F
05/03 23:17, 17F
→
05/03 23:17, , 18F
05/03 23:17, 18F
→
05/03 23:18, , 19F
05/03 23:18, 19F
→
05/03 23:18, , 20F
05/03 23:18, 20F
→
05/03 23:18, , 21F
05/03 23:18, 21F
→
05/03 23:18, , 22F
05/03 23:18, 22F
推
05/03 23:18, , 23F
05/03 23:18, 23F
→
05/03 23:19, , 24F
05/03 23:19, 24F
→
05/03 23:19, , 25F
05/03 23:19, 25F
推
05/03 23:20, , 26F
05/03 23:20, 26F
→
05/03 23:20, , 27F
05/03 23:20, 27F
→
05/03 23:21, , 28F
05/03 23:21, 28F
→
05/03 23:21, , 29F
05/03 23:21, 29F
推
05/03 23:21, , 30F
05/03 23:21, 30F
→
05/03 23:21, , 31F
05/03 23:21, 31F
→
05/03 23:21, , 32F
05/03 23:21, 32F
→
05/03 23:23, , 33F
05/03 23:23, 33F
→
05/03 23:23, , 34F
05/03 23:23, 34F
→
05/03 23:24, , 35F
05/03 23:24, 35F
推
05/03 23:24, , 36F
05/03 23:24, 36F
→
05/03 23:24, , 37F
05/03 23:24, 37F
還有 27 則推文
→
05/03 23:36, , 65F
05/03 23:36, 65F
→
05/03 23:37, , 66F
05/03 23:37, 66F
推
05/03 23:39, , 67F
05/03 23:39, 67F
→
05/03 23:40, , 68F
05/03 23:40, 68F
→
05/03 23:49, , 69F
05/03 23:49, 69F
推
05/03 23:51, , 70F
05/03 23:51, 70F
→
05/03 23:52, , 71F
05/03 23:52, 71F
→
05/03 23:52, , 72F
05/03 23:52, 72F
→
05/03 23:53, , 73F
05/03 23:53, 73F
推
05/04 00:14, , 74F
05/04 00:14, 74F
→
05/04 00:29, , 75F
05/04 00:29, 75F
推
05/04 00:29, , 76F
05/04 00:29, 76F
→
05/04 00:29, , 77F
05/04 00:29, 77F
→
05/04 00:30, , 78F
05/04 00:30, 78F
→
05/04 00:31, , 79F
05/04 00:31, 79F
推
05/04 00:44, , 80F
05/04 00:44, 80F
推
05/04 01:10, , 81F
05/04 01:10, 81F
→
05/04 01:14, , 82F
05/04 01:14, 82F
推
05/04 03:49, , 83F
05/04 03:49, 83F
→
05/04 03:49, , 84F
05/04 03:49, 84F
推
05/04 08:36, , 85F
05/04 08:36, 85F
推
05/04 09:34, , 86F
05/04 09:34, 86F
推
05/04 10:41, , 87F
05/04 10:41, 87F
推
05/04 12:58, , 88F
05/04 12:58, 88F
→
05/04 12:59, , 89F
05/04 12:59, 89F
→
05/04 12:59, , 90F
05/04 12:59, 90F
推
05/04 17:12, , 91F
05/04 17:12, 91F
→
05/04 18:19, , 92F
05/04 18:19, 92F
推
05/04 18:32, , 93F
05/04 18:32, 93F
推
05/04 18:53, , 94F
05/04 18:53, 94F
推
05/04 19:11, , 95F
05/04 19:11, 95F
推
05/04 19:13, , 96F
05/04 19:13, 96F
→
05/04 19:14, , 97F
05/04 19:14, 97F
→
05/04 19:15, , 98F
05/04 19:15, 98F
→
05/04 19:16, , 99F
05/04 19:16, 99F
推
05/04 19:31, , 100F
05/04 19:31, 100F
→
05/05 07:47, , 101F
05/05 07:47, 101F
→
05/05 07:47, , 102F
05/05 07:47, 102F
→
05/06 21:43, , 103F
05/06 21:43, 103F
推
05/13 15:03, , 104F
05/13 15:03, 104F
討論串 (同標題文章)