[新聞] 徐旭東質疑水泥進口 杜紫宸:有何不可?
1.原文連結(超過一行或過長必須縮網址):
https://udn.com/news/story/11207/2524188?from=udn-catelistnews_ch2
2.原文內容:
徐旭東質疑水泥進口 杜紫宸:有何不可?
對於亞泥董事長徐旭東問記者,「難道台灣要進口水泥?」前工研院知識經濟與競爭力研
究中心主任杜紫宸在臉書指出,難道不可以?用他國廉價資源,創造本地建設,何樂不為
?
「看見台灣」導演齊柏林5月曾感嘆太魯閣亞泥礦場比5年前拍攝時挖得更深,10日他不幸
意外死亡,外界對亞泥齊聲撻伐,行政院最新拍板的礦業法修正草案,要求礦場展延要做
環境影響評估,亞泥須補辦程序。
亞泥董事長徐旭東則回應,礦場深挖是為了不要擴大開挖面積,且將來可以蓄水養魚。
杜紫宸強調,對於進口水泥,「我的立即答案就是why not?」先撇開以挖山破壞國土,
來換取所謂「建設」,其利弊得失,孰輕孰重。單單從著名經濟學家李嘉圖的比較優勢分
析邏輯來看,台灣鄰近的日本,早就進口水泥啦!左邊的中國大陸,更是世界最大水泥生
產國,而且產能過剩,目前正被迫痛苦減產中呢!
他表示,台灣數十年來,不是也大量進口石油、煤炭,甚至水果、牛肉嗎?徐董事長的腦
袋,也是水泥做的嗎?
他更進一步指出,至於從中國大陸進口水泥,有沒有國家安全的考慮呢?您想太多了啦!
難道中國大陸的水泥袋裡,都暗藏著竊聽設備?
他分析,台灣40年前窮,沒有外匯,挖半屏山,自己製造水泥,搞硬體建設,那真的是不
得已。現在進口水泥成本,不計關稅,比自製的還便宜,幹嘛還要挖山?
杜紫宸開玩笑說,徐董也許是想在太魯閣旁,比照長白山天池規模,開發一座世界級景區
。偉哉,徐董!政院應立即將此構想列入前瞻計畫!
3.心得/評論(必需填寫滿20字):
對台灣來說,進口水泥對台灣是好的
只是對某些水泥股來說,股價恐將面臨10元保衛戰
真要轉行去養高山魚了
--
吾開天眼覷紅塵,可憐身是眼中人 http://tinyurl.com/nqprycc
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.170.34.251
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1497446405.A.4A8.html
推
06/14 21:21, , 1F
06/14 21:21, 1F
→
06/14 21:22, , 2F
06/14 21:22, 2F
→
06/14 21:23, , 3F
06/14 21:23, 3F
我是台灣人,關心台灣事
※ 編輯: anti87 (118.170.34.251), 06/14/2017 21:23:54
推
06/14 21:25, , 4F
06/14 21:25, 4F
推
06/14 21:27, , 5F
06/14 21:27, 5F
→
06/14 21:27, , 6F
06/14 21:27, 6F
噓
06/14 21:29, , 7F
06/14 21:29, 7F
推
06/14 21:32, , 8F
06/14 21:32, 8F
推
06/14 21:33, , 9F
06/14 21:33, 9F
→
06/14 21:34, , 10F
06/14 21:34, 10F
→
06/14 21:34, , 11F
06/14 21:34, 11F
推
06/14 21:37, , 12F
06/14 21:37, 12F
推
06/14 21:39, , 13F
06/14 21:39, 13F
→
06/14 21:39, , 14F
06/14 21:39, 14F
→
06/14 21:40, , 15F
06/14 21:40, 15F
→
06/14 21:41, , 16F
06/14 21:41, 16F
→
06/14 21:42, , 17F
06/14 21:42, 17F
→
06/14 21:43, , 18F
06/14 21:43, 18F
推
06/14 21:44, , 19F
06/14 21:44, 19F
噓
06/14 22:06, , 20F
06/14 22:06, 20F
推
06/14 22:07, , 21F
06/14 22:07, 21F
→
06/14 22:07, , 22F
06/14 22:07, 22F
→
06/14 22:08, , 23F
06/14 22:08, 23F
→
06/14 22:08, , 24F
06/14 22:08, 24F
噓
06/14 22:08, , 25F
06/14 22:08, 25F
噓
06/14 22:18, , 26F
06/14 22:18, 26F
→
06/14 22:18, , 27F
06/14 22:18, 27F
→
06/14 22:18, , 28F
06/14 22:18, 28F
推
06/14 22:22, , 29F
06/14 22:22, 29F
→
06/14 22:22, , 30F
06/14 22:22, 30F
噓
06/14 22:37, , 31F
06/14 22:37, 31F
→
06/14 22:42, , 32F
06/14 22:42, 32F
推
06/14 22:43, , 33F
06/14 22:43, 33F
→
06/14 22:44, , 34F
06/14 22:44, 34F
→
06/14 22:44, , 35F
06/14 22:44, 35F
噓
06/14 22:47, , 36F
06/14 22:47, 36F
→
06/14 22:53, , 37F
06/14 22:53, 37F
→
06/14 22:53, , 38F
06/14 22:53, 38F
推
06/14 22:58, , 39F
06/14 22:58, 39F
噓
06/14 22:59, , 40F
06/14 22:59, 40F
噓
06/14 23:03, , 41F
06/14 23:03, 41F
推
06/14 23:05, , 42F
06/14 23:05, 42F
→
06/14 23:06, , 43F
06/14 23:06, 43F
推
06/14 23:06, , 44F
06/14 23:06, 44F
推
06/14 23:18, , 45F
06/14 23:18, 45F
推
06/14 23:18, , 46F
06/14 23:18, 46F
推
06/14 23:23, , 47F
06/14 23:23, 47F
推
06/14 23:25, , 48F
06/14 23:25, 48F
推
06/14 23:42, , 49F
06/14 23:42, 49F
噓
06/14 23:52, , 50F
06/14 23:52, 50F
→
06/14 23:53, , 51F
06/14 23:53, 51F
推
06/15 00:14, , 52F
06/15 00:14, 52F
→
06/15 00:32, , 53F
06/15 00:32, 53F
推
06/15 00:54, , 54F
06/15 00:54, 54F
推
06/15 01:21, , 55F
06/15 01:21, 55F
推
06/15 05:42, , 56F
06/15 05:42, 56F
→
06/15 06:50, , 57F
06/15 06:50, 57F
推
06/15 08:18, , 58F
06/15 08:18, 58F
推
06/15 08:24, , 59F
06/15 08:24, 59F
→
06/15 08:24, , 60F
06/15 08:24, 60F
推
06/15 09:08, , 61F
06/15 09:08, 61F
→
06/15 09:37, , 62F
06/15 09:37, 62F
推
06/15 10:09, , 63F
06/15 10:09, 63F
→
06/15 11:49, , 64F
06/15 11:49, 64F
→
06/15 12:40, , 65F
06/15 12:40, 65F
推
06/15 15:16, , 66F
06/15 15:16, 66F
推
06/16 13:14, , 67F
06/16 13:14, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):