[新聞] 力挺周永明 王雪紅:他做得非常、非常好已回收
看板Stock作者Huntelaar (Klaas Jan Huntelaar !!)時間10年前 (2013/09/09 11:27)推噓25(34推 9噓 35→)留言78則, 58人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
1.原文連結:
http://www.nownews.com/2013/09/09/91-2983758.htm
2.內容:
宏達電爆發設計部副總涉及洩密案,不僅是股價再度向下探底,由於涉案人被視為是執行
長周永明的子弟兵,因此引發外界質疑,董事長王雪紅9日公開力挺周永明,強調「他做
得非常、非常好」,不會有其他考量,但她也坦言,宏達電的確沒有調整好腳步,還有很
大要進步的地方,全公司都要進步。
王雪紅指出,面對競爭,宏達電的確是沒有調整好腳步,還沒有做好,這些都是應該腳踏
實地做好,她說,宏達電的營銷落後,應該要把做出來的好產品賣的更好,這部分有很大
要進步的地方,不只是執行長,「我也沒有做好」。
王雪紅表示,宏達電重視創新,在產品中,創新的裡面是自己設計的,會把成本加高,所
以還要再進步,她強調,不是沒有體認要加強,宏達電非常知道、非常努力要加強。
王雪紅說,宏達電一向管理非常嚴謹,是上市公司非常透明,每個人的創新都是寶貴資產
,會非常小心保護智慧財產權。
宏達電股價仍受到8月營收及洩密案的衝擊,9日早盤以130元低盤開出,盤中一度重挫至
跌停122元,隨著王雪紅公開力挺周永明,股價打開跌停,但盤中跌幅仍逾5.34%。
3.心得/評論(必需填寫):
難怪今天跌停
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.21.159.187
→
09/09 11:29, , 1F
09/09 11:29, 1F
推
09/09 11:29, , 2F
09/09 11:29, 2F
推
09/09 11:30, , 3F
09/09 11:30, 3F
→
09/09 11:31, , 4F
09/09 11:31, 4F
噓
09/09 11:31, , 5F
09/09 11:31, 5F
推
09/09 11:31, , 6F
09/09 11:31, 6F
推
09/09 11:32, , 7F
09/09 11:32, 7F
→
09/09 11:33, , 8F
09/09 11:33, 8F
→
09/09 11:33, , 9F
09/09 11:33, 9F
→
09/09 11:33, , 10F
09/09 11:33, 10F
→
09/09 11:34, , 11F
09/09 11:34, 11F
→
09/09 11:35, , 12F
09/09 11:35, 12F
推
09/09 11:35, , 13F
09/09 11:35, 13F
→
09/09 11:35, , 14F
09/09 11:35, 14F
推
09/09 11:36, , 15F
09/09 11:36, 15F
→
09/09 11:37, , 16F
09/09 11:37, 16F
噓
09/09 11:39, , 17F
09/09 11:39, 17F
推
09/09 11:40, , 18F
09/09 11:40, 18F
噓
09/09 11:41, , 19F
09/09 11:41, 19F
推
09/09 11:43, , 20F
09/09 11:43, 20F
噓
09/09 11:43, , 21F
09/09 11:43, 21F
→
09/09 11:44, , 22F
09/09 11:44, 22F
→
09/09 11:45, , 23F
09/09 11:45, 23F
推
09/09 11:46, , 24F
09/09 11:46, 24F
噓
09/09 11:46, , 25F
09/09 11:46, 25F
推
09/09 11:46, , 26F
09/09 11:46, 26F
推
09/09 11:46, , 27F
09/09 11:46, 27F
→
09/09 11:46, , 28F
09/09 11:46, 28F
→
09/09 11:47, , 29F
09/09 11:47, 29F
推
09/09 11:48, , 30F
09/09 11:48, 30F
推
09/09 11:49, , 31F
09/09 11:49, 31F
推
09/09 11:49, , 32F
09/09 11:49, 32F
→
09/09 11:49, , 33F
09/09 11:49, 33F
→
09/09 11:49, , 34F
09/09 11:49, 34F
推
09/09 11:49, , 35F
09/09 11:49, 35F
→
09/09 11:49, , 36F
09/09 11:49, 36F
→
09/09 11:50, , 37F
09/09 11:50, 37F
推
09/09 11:50, , 38F
09/09 11:50, 38F
→
09/09 11:50, , 39F
09/09 11:50, 39F
噓
09/09 11:53, , 40F
09/09 11:53, 40F
推
09/09 11:53, , 41F
09/09 11:53, 41F
→
09/09 11:55, , 42F
09/09 11:55, 42F
推
09/09 11:59, , 43F
09/09 11:59, 43F
→
09/09 12:00, , 44F
09/09 12:00, 44F
推
09/09 12:00, , 45F
09/09 12:00, 45F
噓
09/09 12:00, , 46F
09/09 12:00, 46F
推
09/09 12:01, , 47F
09/09 12:01, 47F
噓
09/09 12:02, , 48F
09/09 12:02, 48F
推
09/09 12:03, , 49F
09/09 12:03, 49F
推
09/09 12:03, , 50F
09/09 12:03, 50F
→
09/09 12:03, , 51F
09/09 12:03, 51F
噓
09/09 12:11, , 52F
09/09 12:11, 52F
→
09/09 12:17, , 53F
09/09 12:17, 53F
推
09/09 12:32, , 54F
09/09 12:32, 54F
→
09/09 12:33, , 55F
09/09 12:33, 55F
推
09/09 12:39, , 56F
09/09 12:39, 56F
推
09/09 12:45, , 57F
09/09 12:45, 57F
推
09/09 12:50, , 58F
09/09 12:50, 58F
推
09/09 12:50, , 59F
09/09 12:50, 59F
→
09/09 12:51, , 60F
09/09 12:51, 60F
→
09/09 13:04, , 61F
09/09 13:04, 61F
推
09/09 13:10, , 62F
09/09 13:10, 62F
推
09/09 13:36, , 63F
09/09 13:36, 63F
→
09/09 13:36, , 64F
09/09 13:36, 64F
→
09/09 13:36, , 65F
09/09 13:36, 65F
推
09/09 13:45, , 66F
09/09 13:45, 66F
推
09/09 13:48, , 67F
09/09 13:48, 67F
→
09/09 14:03, , 68F
09/09 14:03, 68F
→
09/09 14:04, , 69F
09/09 14:04, 69F
→
09/09 14:12, , 70F
09/09 14:12, 70F
推
09/09 15:52, , 71F
09/09 15:52, 71F
推
09/09 19:38, , 72F
09/09 19:38, 72F
→
09/09 19:40, , 73F
09/09 19:40, 73F
→
09/09 19:40, , 74F
09/09 19:40, 74F
→
09/09 20:12, , 75F
09/09 20:12, 75F
推
09/10 01:00, , 76F
09/10 01:00, 76F
→
08/13 01:46, , 77F
08/13 01:46, 77F
→
09/15 21:57, , 78F
09/15 21:57, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):