Re: [BOX ] Spurs 96:87 Grizzlies
推
04/23 22:10,
04/23 22:10
→
04/23 22:12,
04/23 22:12
→
04/23 22:14,
04/23 22:14
→
04/23 22:14,
04/23 22:14
→
04/23 22:16,
04/23 22:16
→
04/23 22:16,
04/23 22:16
→
04/23 22:18,
04/23 22:18
→
04/23 22:18,
04/23 22:18
→
04/23 22:20,
04/23 22:20
→
04/23 22:20,
04/23 22:20
→
04/23 22:21,
04/23 22:21
推
04/23 22:59,
04/23 22:59
→
04/23 23:00,
04/23 23:00
推
04/23 23:06,
04/23 23:06
推
04/23 23:16,
04/23 23:16
→
04/23 23:17,
04/23 23:17
要理性討論是吧,來。
為了怕你說我不夠客觀不夠冷血,我們把 Tony Parker所有在馬刺的功業都放到一旁。
生涯四枚冠軍戒指、一座Finals MVP,六次明星賽、四次年度球隊
隊史助攻第一,出賽數第二,得分第四,抄截第七,就連籃板都能排到隊史第十
這些在馬刺的榮譽、球迷人氣,跟一件勢必會退休的九號球衣全部先不討論
有三個問題我想請教一下:
1.TP爛到有剩,想弄來CP3是人之常情,這我可以理解。
但是TP合約到2018,還有兩年30M,請問是要怎麼把他的合約清掉?
你一邊說人家爛到有剩一邊說有交易價值,其他球隊的GM都是潘仔?
被你說爛到有剩的球員要其他球隊吞下去,不太對吧?
2.CP3在合約最後一年(2017-18)有球員選擇權沒錯,但是他那年要24M
馬刺何德何能要人家放棄24M的薪水來一個一沒球權二沒地位三沒市場的地方?
冠軍希望?先不說到時候聯盟局勢如何,真的要冠軍去找姆斯組隊也不會差到哪裡去
而且還可以跟好朋友一起打球,幹嘛要來你聖安東尼奧?
3.這個假設還是我幫你多想的,因為你好像不是很清楚CP3的合約狀況
如果等到2018年CP3的合約到期,以上兩個問題都沒有了
既不用推銷TP的合約也不用要人家放棄薪水,感覺兩全其美
但是那時候CP3已經32歲多了,容我提醒你一下:
TP生涯打最差的一年也就是去年正好是他32歲的時候。
你現在嫌33歲的TP爛到有剩,那到時候32歲的CP3是會好多少?
等到你能夠回答這些問題再來理性討論啦。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.182.195
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Spurs/M.1461427659.A.946.html
推
04/24 00:18, , 1F
04/24 00:18, 1F
推
04/24 00:20, , 2F
04/24 00:20, 2F
→
04/24 00:21, , 3F
04/24 00:21, 3F
推
04/24 00:27, , 4F
04/24 00:27, 4F
推
04/24 00:32, , 5F
04/24 00:32, 5F
推
04/24 00:34, , 6F
04/24 00:34, 6F
→
04/24 00:35, , 7F
04/24 00:35, 7F
推
04/24 00:38, , 8F
04/24 00:38, 8F
推
04/24 01:12, , 9F
04/24 01:12, 9F
→
04/24 01:13, , 10F
04/24 01:13, 10F
→
04/24 01:13, , 11F
04/24 01:13, 11F
推
04/24 01:16, , 12F
04/24 01:16, 12F
推
04/24 01:19, , 13F
04/24 01:19, 13F
推
04/24 01:57, , 14F
04/24 01:57, 14F
推
04/24 03:57, , 15F
04/24 03:57, 15F
→
04/24 03:57, , 16F
04/24 03:57, 16F
→
04/24 03:57, , 17F
04/24 03:57, 17F
→
04/24 03:57, , 18F
04/24 03:57, 18F
推
04/24 06:44, , 19F
04/24 06:44, 19F
→
04/24 06:45, , 20F
04/24 06:45, 20F
→
04/24 06:46, , 21F
04/24 06:46, 21F
→
04/24 06:48, , 22F
04/24 06:48, 22F
還有 38 則推文
→
04/24 10:07, , 61F
04/24 10:07, 61F
推
04/24 10:23, , 62F
04/24 10:23, 62F
推
04/24 11:09, , 63F
04/24 11:09, 63F
→
04/24 11:11, , 64F
04/24 11:11, 64F
→
04/24 11:12, , 65F
04/24 11:12, 65F
→
04/24 11:14, , 66F
04/24 11:14, 66F
→
04/24 11:15, , 67F
04/24 11:15, 67F
→
04/24 11:22, , 68F
04/24 11:22, 68F
→
04/24 11:24, , 69F
04/24 11:24, 69F
推
04/24 11:25, , 70F
04/24 11:25, 70F
→
04/24 11:26, , 71F
04/24 11:26, 71F
→
04/24 11:27, , 72F
04/24 11:27, 72F
→
04/24 11:27, , 73F
04/24 11:27, 73F
推
04/24 11:29, , 74F
04/24 11:29, 74F
→
04/24 11:30, , 75F
04/24 11:30, 75F
→
04/24 11:34, , 76F
04/24 11:34, 76F
→
04/24 11:36, , 77F
04/24 11:36, 77F
→
04/24 11:38, , 78F
04/24 11:38, 78F
→
04/24 11:40, , 79F
04/24 11:40, 79F
→
04/24 11:51, , 80F
04/24 11:51, 80F
推
04/24 13:06, , 81F
04/24 13:06, 81F
推
04/24 13:08, , 82F
04/24 13:08, 82F
推
04/24 13:35, , 83F
04/24 13:35, 83F
推
04/24 15:33, , 84F
04/24 15:33, 84F
推
04/24 18:10, , 85F
04/24 18:10, 85F
推
04/24 19:43, , 86F
04/24 19:43, 86F
→
04/24 19:44, , 87F
04/24 19:44, 87F
→
04/24 19:45, , 88F
04/24 19:45, 88F
→
04/24 19:46, , 89F
04/24 19:46, 89F
推
04/24 19:47, , 90F
04/24 19:47, 90F
推
04/24 19:52, , 91F
04/24 19:52, 91F
推
04/24 19:53, , 92F
04/24 19:53, 92F
推
04/24 20:03, , 93F
04/24 20:03, 93F
推
04/24 23:02, , 94F
04/24 23:02, 94F
推
04/25 13:25, , 95F
04/25 13:25, 95F
→
04/25 13:27, , 96F
04/25 13:27, 96F
推
04/25 16:19, , 97F
04/25 16:19, 97F
→
04/25 16:20, , 98F
04/25 16:20, 98F
推
04/25 17:23, , 99F
04/25 17:23, 99F
→
04/25 22:06, , 100F
04/25 22:06, 100F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):