[請益]二類組想走電類 請教幾個科系的差異
小妹是今年應屆考生
高三模擬考幾次下來約略在69~72
結果學測考了個66...QAQ
只好擦擦眼淚再戰指考
進入正題
指考大略對過答案後
我也上網搜尋了一些有興趣的科系
其中讓我疑惑的是交大
光是電類的系就有電子、電機、光電
還有理學院的電物系
但是清大卻沒有這樣細分
想請問各位大大
交大電子跟電機以及清大電機看起來都是很類似的系
他們的差別以及優缺點有哪些?
大部分學校都只有電機系,而交大卻把電類分成好幾個系
會不會造成所學的東西比其他學校的電機還要少啊?
先謝謝大家了> <
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.253.188.192
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/SENIORHIGH/M.1405177775.A.AD7.html
推
07/12 23:15, , 1F
07/12 23:15, 1F
→
07/12 23:17, , 2F
07/12 23:17, 2F
這樣的話未來的發展會跟電子差很多嗎?
我有去看課程表,但是專業科目部分還是看不太懂QQ
推
07/12 23:20, , 3F
07/12 23:20, 3F
推
07/12 23:22, , 4F
07/12 23:22, 4F
→
07/12 23:24, , 5F
07/12 23:24, 5F
推
07/12 23:25, , 6F
07/12 23:25, 6F
→
07/12 23:26, , 7F
07/12 23:26, 7F
推
07/12 23:28, , 8F
07/12 23:28, 8F
推
07/12 23:34, , 9F
07/12 23:34, 9F
謝謝大家的回答
那麼交大跟清大的電類資源會差很多嗎? 聽說交大是以電子創校的
※ 編輯: junohong (111.253.188.192), 07/12/2014 23:54:48
→
07/12 23:42, , 10F
07/12 23:42, 10F
→
07/12 23:43, , 11F
07/12 23:43, 11F
因為想先做點功課嘛QQ 希望不要畫卡畫錯還是分數爆衝之類的...
→
07/12 23:44, , 12F
07/12 23:44, 12F
→
07/12 23:48, , 13F
07/12 23:48, 13F
→
07/12 23:49, , 14F
07/12 23:49, 14F
※ 編輯: junohong (111.253.188.192), 07/12/2014 23:58:36
推
07/12 23:57, , 15F
07/12 23:57, 15F
→
07/12 23:59, , 16F
07/12 23:59, 16F
→
07/13 00:02, , 17F
07/13 00:02, 17F
推
07/13 00:05, , 18F
07/13 00:05, 18F
→
07/13 00:06, , 19F
07/13 00:06, 19F
推
07/13 00:21, , 20F
07/13 00:21, 20F
推
07/13 00:24, , 21F
07/13 00:24, 21F
推
07/13 00:28, , 22F
07/13 00:28, 22F
推
07/13 00:29, , 23F
07/13 00:29, 23F
推
07/13 00:30, , 24F
07/13 00:30, 24F
→
07/13 00:31, , 25F
07/13 00:31, 25F
→
07/13 00:31, , 26F
07/13 00:31, 26F
→
07/13 00:37, , 27F
07/13 00:37, 27F
推
07/13 00:41, , 28F
07/13 00:41, 28F
推
07/13 02:04, , 29F
07/13 02:04, 29F
→
07/13 02:05, , 30F
07/13 02:05, 30F
→
07/13 02:05, , 31F
07/13 02:05, 31F
→
07/13 02:06, , 32F
07/13 02:06, 32F
→
07/13 02:07, , 33F
07/13 02:07, 33F
→
07/13 02:08, , 34F
07/13 02:08, 34F
推
07/13 03:15, , 35F
07/13 03:15, 35F
→
07/13 03:16, , 36F
07/13 03:16, 36F
推
07/13 10:40, , 37F
07/13 10:40, 37F
→
07/13 10:41, , 38F
07/13 10:41, 38F
→
07/13 10:42, , 39F
07/13 10:42, 39F
推
07/13 12:25, , 40F
07/13 12:25, 40F
→
07/13 12:35, , 41F
07/13 12:35, 41F
→
07/13 12:45, , 42F
07/13 12:45, 42F
→
07/13 12:46, , 43F
07/13 12:46, 43F
→
07/13 12:48, , 44F
07/13 12:48, 44F
→
07/13 12:48, , 45F
07/13 12:48, 45F
推
07/13 14:00, , 46F
07/13 14:00, 46F
→
07/13 14:01, , 47F
07/13 14:01, 47F
→
07/13 14:03, , 48F
07/13 14:03, 48F
推
07/13 14:06, , 49F
07/13 14:06, 49F
→
07/13 14:07, , 50F
07/13 14:07, 50F
→
07/13 14:43, , 51F
07/13 14:43, 51F
推
07/13 15:38, , 52F
07/13 15:38, 52F
推
07/13 18:45, , 53F
07/13 18:45, 53F
推
07/14 22:24, , 54F
07/14 22:24, 54F
→
07/14 22:24, , 55F
07/14 22:24, 55F
→
07/14 23:51, , 56F
07/14 23:51, 56F
推
07/15 17:45, , 57F
07/15 17:45, 57F
→
07/15 19:29, , 58F
07/15 19:29, 58F
→
07/15 19:30, , 59F
07/15 19:30, 59F
推
07/15 22:24, , 60F
07/15 22:24, 60F
→
07/15 22:24, , 61F
07/15 22:24, 61F
→
07/15 22:25, , 62F
07/15 22:25, 62F
→
07/15 22:25, , 63F
07/15 22:25, 63F
→
07/16 03:54, , 64F
07/16 03:54, 64F
→
10/24 08:27, , 65F
10/24 08:27, 65F
→
12/14 20:03,
5年前
, 66F
12/14 20:03, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):