Re: [問題] 10星SP哪幾個CP值比較高呀??
※ 引述《dn410054 (Sunkist)》之銘言:
: 球員名稱 隊伍 左右 星資 體力 球速 球威 變化 控球 精神 總和
: Clayton Kershaw LAD L 10 85 72 76 82 80 79 474
: Roy Halladay PHI R 10 85 70 73 81 84 79 472
: Justin VerlanderDET R 10 84 81 73 80 82 72 472
: Tim Lincecum SF R 10 81 72 80 83 82 73 471
: Felix Hernandez SEA R 10 85 74 71 83 78 78 469
: CC Sabathia NYY L 10 85 83 68 82 79 69 466
: Josh Johnson FLA R 10 80 80 75 70 81 77 463
: Dan Haren LAA R 10 83 62 73 84 83 76 461
: Cliff Lee PHI L 10 85 68 70 76 84 68 451
幫LEE說一下話
純看能力 的確LEE是最弱的 但是LEE強在耐投 以及控球 還有全方位的球種 B B B C
依照我從改版前到改版後持續用LEE的經驗 BK 85UP CT90 CL70 的LEE
配上不錯的守備陣容 他可以穩定提供 200IP 180~200K ERA 2.50上下 WHIP 1.00左右
其實仔細觀察每個星等的投手 不難發現 遊戲的設定上
球種好且多的投手 基礎能力都是 該星等同位置中 相對低的選手
但是這樣的投手通常有CT BK不高 球種卻很好
這類投手 一旦BK加上來 球種都好得嚇人
回歸主題 10*SP中我最討厭遇到的還是DOC 其次是盲腸
LEE 則是要看對方守備 其他沒有特別的印象 XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 175.98.78.248
推
11/16 00:27, , 1F
11/16 00:27, 1F
推
11/16 00:28, , 2F
11/16 00:28, 2F
推
11/16 00:28, , 3F
11/16 00:28, 3F
→
11/16 00:28, , 4F
11/16 00:28, 4F
→
11/16 00:28, , 5F
11/16 00:28, 5F
→
11/16 00:29, , 6F
11/16 00:29, 6F
→
11/16 00:30, , 7F
11/16 00:30, 7F
→
11/16 00:31, , 8F
11/16 00:31, 8F
推
11/16 00:34, , 9F
11/16 00:34, 9F
→
11/16 00:39, , 10F
11/16 00:39, 10F
推
11/16 00:39, , 11F
11/16 00:39, 11F
→
11/16 00:42, , 12F
11/16 00:42, 12F
→
11/16 00:43, , 13F
11/16 00:43, 13F
推
11/16 00:44, , 14F
11/16 00:44, 14F
→
11/16 00:46, , 15F
11/16 00:46, 15F
→
11/16 00:49, , 16F
11/16 00:49, 16F
→
11/16 00:49, , 17F
11/16 00:49, 17F
→
11/16 00:49, , 18F
11/16 00:49, 18F
→
11/16 00:51, , 19F
11/16 00:51, 19F
→
11/16 00:52, , 20F
11/16 00:52, 20F
→
11/16 00:52, , 21F
11/16 00:52, 21F
→
11/16 00:52, , 22F
11/16 00:52, 22F
→
11/16 00:52, , 23F
11/16 00:52, 23F
→
11/16 00:54, , 24F
11/16 00:54, 24F
→
11/16 00:54, , 25F
11/16 00:54, 25F
推
11/16 00:55, , 26F
11/16 00:55, 26F
→
11/16 00:56, , 27F
11/16 00:56, 27F
→
11/16 00:56, , 28F
11/16 00:56, 28F
→
11/16 00:58, , 29F
11/16 00:58, 29F
→
11/16 01:01, , 30F
11/16 01:01, 30F
→
11/16 01:03, , 31F
11/16 01:03, 31F
推
11/16 01:04, , 32F
11/16 01:04, 32F
→
11/16 01:04, , 33F
11/16 01:04, 33F
→
11/16 01:04, , 34F
11/16 01:04, 34F
→
11/16 01:05, , 35F
11/16 01:05, 35F
→
11/16 01:05, , 36F
11/16 01:05, 36F
→
11/16 01:06, , 37F
11/16 01:06, 37F
推
11/16 01:09, , 38F
11/16 01:09, 38F
→
11/16 01:10, , 39F
11/16 01:10, 39F
→
11/16 01:10, , 40F
11/16 01:10, 40F
→
11/16 01:12, , 41F
11/16 01:12, 41F
→
11/16 01:13, , 42F
11/16 01:13, 42F
→
11/16 01:15, , 43F
11/16 01:15, 43F
推
11/16 01:16, , 44F
11/16 01:16, 44F
推
11/16 01:29, , 45F
11/16 01:29, 45F
→
11/16 01:59, , 46F
11/16 01:59, 46F
推
11/16 02:00, , 47F
11/16 02:00, 47F
推
11/16 02:11, , 48F
11/16 02:11, 48F
推
11/16 10:29, , 49F
11/16 10:29, 49F
推
11/16 12:12, , 50F
11/16 12:12, 50F
→
11/16 12:12, , 51F
11/16 12:12, 51F
推
11/16 15:22, , 52F
11/16 15:22, 52F
推
11/16 15:37, , 53F
11/16 15:37, 53F
推
11/16 15:39, , 54F
11/16 15:39, 54F
→
11/16 15:40, , 55F
11/16 15:40, 55F
→
11/16 15:41, , 56F
11/16 15:41, 56F
→
11/16 15:42, , 57F
11/16 15:42, 57F
推
11/16 15:46, , 58F
11/16 15:46, 58F
→
11/16 22:01, , 59F
11/16 22:01, 59F
推
11/16 22:04, , 60F
11/16 22:04, 60F
→
11/16 22:05, , 61F
11/16 22:05, 61F
→
11/16 22:09, , 62F
11/16 22:09, 62F
→
11/16 22:10, , 63F
11/16 22:10, 63F
→
11/16 22:10, , 64F
11/16 22:10, 64F
→
11/16 22:11, , 65F
11/16 22:11, 65F
→
11/16 22:11, , 66F
11/16 22:11, 66F
推
11/16 22:14, , 67F
11/16 22:14, 67F
推
11/16 22:15, , 68F
11/16 22:15, 68F
推
11/16 22:17, , 69F
11/16 22:17, 69F
推
11/16 22:19, , 70F
11/16 22:19, 70F
推
11/16 22:26, , 71F
11/16 22:26, 71F
推
11/17 00:37, , 72F
11/17 00:37, 72F
推
11/17 00:39, , 73F
11/17 00:39, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):