[問題] 10星SP哪幾個CP值比較高呀??
球員名稱 隊伍 左右 星資 體力 球速 球威 變化 控球 精神 總和
Clayton Kershaw LAD L 10 85 72 76 82 80 79 474
Roy Halladay PHI R 10 85 70 73 81 84 79 472
Justin VerlanderDET R 10 84 81 73 80 82 72 472
Tim Lincecum SF R 10 81 72 80 83 82 73 471
Felix Hernandez SEA R 10 85 74 71 83 78 78 469
CC Sabathia NYY L 10 85 83 68 82 79 69 466
Josh Johnson FLA R 10 80 80 75 70 81 77 463
Dan Haren LAA R 10 83 62 73 84 83 76 461
Cliff Lee PHI L 10 85 68 70 76 84 68 451
我目前在第一季AA 星資很低還無法排上去投
所以想問一下在MLB用過這幾隻的人 哪隻投的比較好?
最近在打算交易備戰MLB
我目前手上有 Felix Hernandez 和 Josh Johnson
粉絲團是NYY 上AAA MLB後捕手打算用 CH I-Rod
所以除了NYY的 C.C.Sabathia 有粉絲團加成外
其它的比較建議用哪一個? 8 9星有不錯用的投手也順便建議一下 ^^
Thx~~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.243.137
→
11/15 20:42, , 1F
11/15 20:42, 1F
推
11/15 20:45, , 2F
11/15 20:45, 2F
→
11/15 20:46, , 3F
11/15 20:46, 3F
→
11/15 20:47, , 4F
11/15 20:47, 4F
推
11/15 20:48, , 5F
11/15 20:48, 5F
→
11/15 20:48, , 6F
11/15 20:48, 6F
→
11/15 20:49, , 7F
11/15 20:49, 7F
推
11/15 20:49, , 8F
11/15 20:49, 8F
→
11/15 20:49, , 9F
11/15 20:49, 9F
→
11/15 20:50, , 10F
11/15 20:50, 10F
→
11/15 20:50, , 11F
11/15 20:50, 11F
→
11/15 20:50, , 12F
11/15 20:50, 12F
→
11/15 20:51, , 13F
11/15 20:51, 13F
→
11/15 20:51, , 14F
11/15 20:51, 14F
→
11/15 20:51, , 15F
11/15 20:51, 15F
→
11/15 20:51, , 16F
11/15 20:51, 16F
→
11/15 20:51, , 17F
11/15 20:51, 17F
推
11/15 20:53, , 18F
11/15 20:53, 18F
推
11/15 20:54, , 19F
11/15 20:54, 19F
→
11/15 20:54, , 20F
11/15 20:54, 20F
→
11/15 20:54, , 21F
11/15 20:54, 21F
→
11/15 20:55, , 22F
11/15 20:55, 22F
→
11/15 20:55, , 23F
11/15 20:55, 23F
→
11/15 20:55, , 24F
11/15 20:55, 24F
→
11/15 20:56, , 25F
11/15 20:56, 25F
推
11/15 21:03, , 26F
11/15 21:03, 26F
→
11/15 21:05, , 27F
11/15 21:05, 27F
→
11/15 21:05, , 28F
11/15 21:05, 28F
→
11/15 21:06, , 29F
11/15 21:06, 29F
→
11/15 21:06, , 30F
11/15 21:06, 30F
→
11/15 21:07, , 31F
11/15 21:07, 31F
推
11/15 21:07, , 32F
11/15 21:07, 32F
→
11/15 21:08, , 33F
11/15 21:08, 33F
→
11/15 21:09, , 34F
11/15 21:09, 34F
推
11/15 21:10, , 35F
11/15 21:10, 35F
→
11/15 21:10, , 36F
11/15 21:10, 36F
→
11/15 21:11, , 37F
11/15 21:11, 37F
→
11/15 21:12, , 38F
11/15 21:12, 38F
推
11/15 21:12, , 39F
11/15 21:12, 39F
→
11/15 21:13, , 40F
11/15 21:13, 40F
推
11/15 21:14, , 41F
11/15 21:14, 41F
推
11/15 21:15, , 42F
11/15 21:15, 42F
→
11/15 21:15, , 43F
11/15 21:15, 43F
→
11/15 21:16, , 44F
11/15 21:16, 44F
→
11/15 21:17, , 45F
11/15 21:17, 45F
→
11/15 21:17, , 46F
11/15 21:17, 46F
→
11/15 21:17, , 47F
11/15 21:17, 47F
→
11/15 21:19, , 48F
11/15 21:19, 48F
推
11/15 21:21, , 49F
11/15 21:21, 49F
推
11/15 21:23, , 50F
11/15 21:23, 50F
推
11/15 22:01, , 51F
11/15 22:01, 51F
推
11/15 22:04, , 52F
11/15 22:04, 52F
推
11/15 22:08, , 53F
11/15 22:08, 53F
→
11/15 22:09, , 54F
11/15 22:09, 54F
推
11/15 22:11, , 55F
11/15 22:11, 55F
推
11/15 22:20, , 56F
11/15 22:20, 56F
推
11/15 22:27, , 57F
11/15 22:27, 57F
→
11/15 22:29, , 58F
11/15 22:29, 58F
推
11/15 22:30, , 59F
11/15 22:30, 59F
推
11/15 22:33, , 60F
11/15 22:33, 60F
→
11/15 22:34, , 61F
11/15 22:34, 61F
推
11/15 22:38, , 62F
11/15 22:38, 62F
→
11/15 22:40, , 63F
11/15 22:40, 63F
推
11/15 22:44, , 64F
11/15 22:44, 64F
→
11/15 22:45, , 65F
11/15 22:45, 65F
推
11/15 22:46, , 66F
11/15 22:46, 66F
→
11/15 22:46, , 67F
11/15 22:46, 67F
推
11/15 22:47, , 68F
11/15 22:47, 68F
推
11/15 22:50, , 69F
11/15 22:50, 69F
推
11/15 22:52, , 70F
11/15 22:52, 70F
推
11/15 23:11, , 71F
11/15 23:11, 71F
推
11/15 23:16, , 72F
11/15 23:16, 72F
推
11/15 23:18, , 73F
11/15 23:18, 73F
推
11/15 23:21, , 74F
11/15 23:21, 74F
推
11/15 23:39, , 75F
11/15 23:39, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):