Re: [問題] 我在某家問班時看到了神奇又恐怖的東
上一篇是代po,但這一篇不是
每家商店裡一定有主力商品,但有天,店裡面決定不再販售其中幾項,一定是經過各種權
衡後的決定。當然消費者可以指著說:「為什麼不賣,你們一定有黑箱,其他商品不好為
什麼不下架那個卻下架這個」,但是這是店家決定,店家有權利決定排面上要推什麼。
再來,即使某些商品下架了,並不代表其他商品不好,也不代表店家因此想隨便了事敷衍
消費者。網路上甚至是實體印榜單,整年度行事曆規劃好給你看,班級師資甚至實名制我
們列出來,只要來參觀補習班,甚至教材考卷讓人參考,就像去實體店面買衣服,讓你摸
到看到還試穿到,我相信這是某些補習班做不到的事。有心參加重考班的同學,難道這些
資料不需要參考?買基金總要知道組成比例、預期獲利跟過往表現吧?如果訊息揭露不完
全,這樣的基金還能買?
說到邱XX老師,我私心覺得他教得好,真的能幫助學生學好物理這科(這不是狗屁也不是
喇賽)但店家權衡後的結果就是這樣。他上得好無庸置疑,但為何文城全科也下過他的課
?
如果真的很挺邱XX老師的人,反倒建議去他個人辛苦經營的個人品牌家教班,讓他有完全
實質上的獲得,或是幫他介紹學生,反而這樣才是真的有幫到他。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.218.51.76
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/RESIT/M.1501287919.A.991.html
噓
07/29 08:39, , 1F
07/29 08:39, 1F
→
07/29 08:39, , 2F
07/29 08:39, 2F
推
07/29 11:06, , 3F
07/29 11:06, 3F
→
07/29 11:06, , 4F
07/29 11:06, 4F
→
07/29 11:06, , 5F
07/29 11:06, 5F
→
07/29 11:06, , 6F
07/29 11:06, 6F
→
07/29 11:06, , 7F
07/29 11:06, 7F
→
07/29 11:07, , 8F
07/29 11:07, 8F
→
07/29 11:07, , 9F
07/29 11:07, 9F
→
07/29 11:07, , 10F
07/29 11:07, 10F
噓
07/29 11:15, , 11F
07/29 11:15, 11F
噓
07/29 12:10, , 12F
07/29 12:10, 12F
推
07/29 13:12, , 13F
07/29 13:12, 13F
→
07/29 13:13, , 14F
07/29 13:13, 14F
→
07/29 13:15, , 15F
07/29 13:15, 15F
→
07/29 13:16, , 16F
07/29 13:16, 16F
→
07/29 13:16, , 17F
07/29 13:16, 17F
噓
07/29 13:18, , 18F
07/29 13:18, 18F
→
07/29 13:18, , 19F
07/29 13:18, 19F
推
07/29 13:23, , 20F
07/29 13:23, 20F
→
07/29 13:23, , 21F
07/29 13:23, 21F
噓
07/29 13:26, , 22F
07/29 13:26, 22F
噓
07/29 13:41, , 23F
07/29 13:41, 23F
→
07/29 13:41, , 24F
07/29 13:41, 24F
→
07/29 13:41, , 25F
07/29 13:41, 25F
→
07/29 13:41, , 26F
07/29 13:41, 26F
→
07/29 13:41, , 27F
07/29 13:41, 27F
噓
07/29 13:47, , 28F
07/29 13:47, 28F
→
07/29 13:47, , 29F
07/29 13:47, 29F
→
07/29 13:47, , 30F
07/29 13:47, 30F
噓
07/29 13:49, , 31F
07/29 13:49, 31F
推
07/29 14:57, , 32F
07/29 14:57, 32F
→
07/29 14:57, , 33F
07/29 14:57, 33F
→
07/29 14:57, , 34F
07/29 14:57, 34F
→
07/29 14:57, , 35F
07/29 14:57, 35F
→
07/29 14:57, , 36F
07/29 14:57, 36F
噓
07/29 15:37, , 37F
07/29 15:37, 37F
→
07/29 15:37, , 38F
07/29 15:37, 38F
→
07/29 15:37, , 39F
07/29 15:37, 39F
→
07/29 15:38, , 40F
07/29 15:38, 40F
→
07/29 15:38, , 41F
07/29 15:38, 41F
→
07/29 15:41, , 42F
07/29 15:41, 42F
→
07/29 15:41, , 43F
07/29 15:41, 43F
→
07/29 15:43, , 44F
07/29 15:43, 44F
→
07/29 15:43, , 45F
07/29 15:43, 45F
→
07/29 16:22, , 46F
07/29 16:22, 46F
→
07/29 16:22, , 47F
07/29 16:22, 47F
→
07/29 16:22, , 48F
07/29 16:22, 48F
噓
07/29 16:49, , 49F
07/29 16:49, 49F
→
07/29 16:49, , 50F
07/29 16:49, 50F
→
07/29 16:49, , 51F
07/29 16:49, 51F
→
07/29 16:49, , 52F
07/29 16:49, 52F
→
07/29 16:49, , 53F
07/29 16:49, 53F
→
07/29 16:49, , 54F
07/29 16:49, 54F
推
07/29 16:58, , 55F
07/29 16:58, 55F
→
07/29 16:58, , 56F
07/29 16:58, 56F
噓
07/29 17:12, , 57F
07/29 17:12, 57F
推
07/29 17:28, , 58F
07/29 17:28, 58F
→
07/29 17:28, , 59F
07/29 17:28, 59F
→
07/29 17:28, , 60F
07/29 17:28, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):