Re: [閒聊] 公務員聯誼績效 內政部列考評
看板PublicServan作者calibration (......)時間15年前 (2010/08/22 13:36)推噓17(17推 0噓 67→)留言84則, 28人參與討論串2/13 (看更多)
看到這種新聞真的一肚子火
結婚率跟生育率低落不是辦幾場聯誼就可以解決的
我跟我女友年收入總合起來破百萬都還會擔心不能養好小孩
何況還是一堆月收入只有22K的人??
拜託你們這些公務員 不要不食人間煙火了好嗎??
※ 引述《diji (南朝鮮首府在漢城)》之銘言:
: http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS3/5800619.shtml
: 內文不轉貼了, 省得浪費頻寬.
: ==
: 如果這篇文章有泛政治化嫌疑, 就請版主大刀砍了, 感恩.
: ==
: 為什麼我會對這篇新聞有趣, 倒不是因為我是個阿宅, 而是 "住福會在幹嘛啊"?
: 怎麼看都應該是考試院住福會的案子, 卻被行政院內政部拿去辦了, 真是0rz.
: 結論=>廢考試院, 相關業務回歸行政院相關機關辦理.
: 考試院除了拿來給大官缺之外, 獨立出來一點意義也沒有.
: ==
: 上面的文字有泛政治化嗎, 應該還好吧.
: 不過我這個人向來就很對跳躍性思考, 在看到這篇新聞標題的時候,
: 又看到另一篇新聞
: 「9月是關鍵」 藍憂雙北輸
: http://mag.udn.com/mag/e2010/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=266205
: 這個資料庫都在用ADO連的政府, 大概又在出怪招了.
: 也不想想3%對大家的傷害有多大, 淨搞些旁門左道的怪招騙選票.
: 或許江部長可能真的是好意, 不過根據過去二十年的經驗,
: 八成又是一個騙選票的餿主意.
: 不把關張拿出來祭旗, 難平民怨啊!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.67.110.32
推
08/22 13:41, , 1F
08/22 13:41, 1F
推
08/22 13:43, , 2F
08/22 13:43, 2F
→
08/22 13:44, , 3F
08/22 13:44, 3F
→
08/22 13:45, , 4F
08/22 13:45, 4F
→
08/22 13:46, , 5F
08/22 13:46, 5F
→
08/22 13:46, , 6F
08/22 13:46, 6F
→
08/22 13:47, , 7F
08/22 13:47, 7F
→
08/22 13:47, , 8F
08/22 13:47, 8F
→
08/22 13:47, , 9F
08/22 13:47, 9F
→
08/22 13:47, , 10F
08/22 13:47, 10F
→
08/22 13:48, , 11F
08/22 13:48, 11F
→
08/22 13:48, , 12F
08/22 13:48, 12F
→
08/22 13:48, , 13F
08/22 13:48, 13F
→
08/22 13:48, , 14F
08/22 13:48, 14F
→
08/22 13:50, , 15F
08/22 13:50, 15F
→
08/22 13:51, , 16F
08/22 13:51, 16F
→
08/22 13:51, , 17F
08/22 13:51, 17F
→
08/22 13:51, , 18F
08/22 13:51, 18F
→
08/22 13:51, , 19F
08/22 13:51, 19F
→
08/22 13:52, , 20F
08/22 13:52, 20F
→
08/22 13:52, , 21F
08/22 13:52, 21F
→
08/22 13:53, , 22F
08/22 13:53, 22F
→
08/22 13:53, , 23F
08/22 13:53, 23F
→
08/22 13:53, , 24F
08/22 13:53, 24F
推
08/22 13:53, , 25F
08/22 13:53, 25F
→
08/22 13:53, , 26F
08/22 13:53, 26F
→
08/22 13:53, , 27F
08/22 13:53, 27F
→
08/22 13:53, , 28F
08/22 13:53, 28F
→
08/22 13:53, , 29F
08/22 13:53, 29F
→
08/22 13:54, , 30F
08/22 13:54, 30F
推
08/22 13:54, , 31F
08/22 13:54, 31F
→
08/22 13:54, , 32F
08/22 13:54, 32F
→
08/22 13:54, , 33F
08/22 13:54, 33F
→
08/22 13:54, , 34F
08/22 13:54, 34F
→
08/22 13:54, , 35F
08/22 13:54, 35F
→
08/22 13:54, , 36F
08/22 13:54, 36F
→
08/22 13:55, , 37F
08/22 13:55, 37F
→
08/22 13:55, , 38F
08/22 13:55, 38F
→
08/22 13:55, , 39F
08/22 13:55, 39F
→
08/22 13:56, , 40F
08/22 13:56, 40F
→
08/22 13:56, , 41F
08/22 13:56, 41F
→
08/22 13:56, , 42F
08/22 13:56, 42F
→
08/22 13:56, , 43F
08/22 13:56, 43F
推
08/22 13:57, , 44F
08/22 13:57, 44F
→
08/22 13:57, , 45F
08/22 13:57, 45F
→
08/22 13:58, , 46F
08/22 13:58, 46F
推
08/22 13:58, , 47F
08/22 13:58, 47F
推
08/22 13:59, , 48F
08/22 13:59, 48F
→
08/22 13:59, , 49F
08/22 13:59, 49F
→
08/22 14:00, , 50F
08/22 14:00, 50F
→
08/22 14:06, , 51F
08/22 14:06, 51F
→
08/22 14:21, , 52F
08/22 14:21, 52F
→
08/22 14:22, , 53F
08/22 14:22, 53F
推
08/22 14:30, , 54F
08/22 14:30, 54F
推
08/22 15:00, , 55F
08/22 15:00, 55F
→
08/22 16:47, , 56F
08/22 16:47, 56F
→
08/22 16:49, , 57F
08/22 16:49, 57F
→
08/22 16:50, , 58F
08/22 16:50, 58F
→
08/22 16:50, , 59F
08/22 16:50, 59F
推
08/22 17:50, , 60F
08/22 17:50, 60F
→
08/22 18:02, , 61F
08/22 18:02, 61F
→
08/22 18:06, , 62F
08/22 18:06, 62F
→
08/22 18:07, , 63F
08/22 18:07, 63F
→
08/22 18:18, , 64F
08/22 18:18, 64F
→
08/22 18:19, , 65F
08/22 18:19, 65F
→
08/22 18:19, , 66F
08/22 18:19, 66F
→
08/22 18:19, , 67F
08/22 18:19, 67F
→
08/22 19:17, , 68F
08/22 19:17, 68F
→
08/22 19:18, , 69F
08/22 19:18, 69F
→
08/22 19:20, , 70F
08/22 19:20, 70F
→
08/22 20:05, , 71F
08/22 20:05, 71F
→
08/22 20:06, , 72F
08/22 20:06, 72F
推
08/22 20:27, , 73F
08/22 20:27, 73F
→
08/22 20:27, , 74F
08/22 20:27, 74F
→
08/22 20:28, , 75F
08/22 20:28, 75F
推
08/22 21:02, , 76F
08/22 21:02, 76F
→
08/22 21:38, , 77F
08/22 21:38, 77F
→
08/22 22:02, , 78F
08/22 22:02, 78F
推
08/22 23:28, , 79F
08/22 23:28, 79F
推
08/23 01:00, , 80F
08/23 01:00, 80F
推
08/23 19:55, , 81F
08/23 19:55, 81F
推
08/23 20:21, , 82F
08/23 20:21, 82F
推
08/23 23:51, , 83F
08/23 23:51, 83F
→
08/23 23:51, , 84F
08/23 23:51, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 13 篇):