Re: [論述] 要如何實踐以國際法法理建國的目標？
看板PublicIssue作者n3oanderson (wake up ...)時間10年前 (2015/04/18 00:05)推噓1(1推 0噓 14→)留言15則, 3人參與討論串2/6 (看更多)
底下只是提供美國官方文件的內容.
席伯德(William Sebald)對日本大使館陳述日本對蘇聯針對齒舞和色丹群島邊界劃定的
讓步是違反(舊金山)條約.
依舊金山條約千島群島跟琉球群島以相同的方式處理, 而美國同意依條約日本對琉球群
島有剩餘主權.
http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v23p1/d89
時間: 1956年
... He(Shigemitsu)說剩下僅有的議題是領土的問題. 蘇聯希望在齒舞群島(Habomai)
和色丹島(Shikotan)的北方劃定邊界. 他(Shigemitsu)詢問這樣的邊界依舊金山條約觀
點是否合法. 他(Shigemitsu)說席伯德(William Sebald)在華盛頓對日本大使館陳述這
樣的讓步(concession)是違反條約(contravention of the Treaty).
concession: something that is allowed or given up, often in order to end a
disagreement, or the act of allowing or giving this.
contravene: to do something that a law or rule does not allow, or to
break a law or rule.
... He said the only remaining point at issue was the territorial question.
The Soviet Union wished to draw a boundary line to the north of Habomai and
Shikotan. He inquired whether such a boundary would be legal from the point
of view of the San Francisco Treaty. He said that Mr. Sebald had stated to
the Japanese Embassy in Washington that such a concession would be in
contravention of the Treaty.
(美國)國務卿(Dulles)提醒 Shigemitsu 千島群島和琉球群島在投降條款(surrender
terms)裡是以相同的方式處理, 而且美國同意依條約日本對琉球仍有剩餘主權...
The Secretary reminded Mr. Shigemitsu that the Kuriles and Ryukyus were
handled in the same manner under the surrender terms and that while the
United States had by the peace treaty agreed that residual sovereignty to
the Ryukyus might remain with Japan, ...
http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx?type=turn&id=
FRUS.FRUS195254v14p2&entity=FRUS.FRUS195254v14p2.p0266&isize=text&q1=
residual
依據和平條約第二款, 日本放棄對韓國, 福爾摩沙, 千島群島, 庫頁島 ... 的
權利. 那可以被推論日本對那些同意託管的群島擁有最終的主權是被承認的.這
個想法是被 Dulles 和英國代表 Younger (勉強)承認(conceded). Dulles 提到
目前日本的形勢(position)如同"剩餘主權".
In Article 2 of the Peace Treaty, Japan renounced right, title
and claim to Korea, Formosa, the Kuriles, Sakhalin, the Mandated
Islands, Antarctic area, the Spratly Islands and the Paracel Is-
lands. It may be inferred that ultimate Japanese sovereignty was
recognized over the islands she agreed to place in trusteeship. This
conception was conceded by Mr. Dulles (page 78, Dept. State Publi-
cation 4392) 8 and by Mr. Younger, the U.K. delegate (page 93,
Dept. State Publication 4392). Mr. Dulles speaks of the current Jap-
anese position as "residual sovereignty".
※ 引述《TheRock (就是這樣)》之銘言：
...
: 日本已經在舊金山和約徹底放棄臺澎主權，
: 相對於日本未放棄主權，僅約定在交聯合國託管前由美國管理的琉球，
: 日本對臺澎並沒有所謂剩餘主權，...
...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.243.93.65
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1429286720.A.C2F.html
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 00:05:54
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 00:06:09
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 00:06:38
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 00:09:09
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 00:09:22
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 00:10:54
推
04/18 00:15, , 1F
04/18 00:15, 1F
→
04/18 00:16, , 2F
04/18 00:16, 2F
→
04/18 00:16, , 3F
04/18 00:16, 3F
→
04/18 00:17, , 4F
04/18 00:17, 4F
→
04/18 00:17, , 5F
04/18 00:17, 5F
→
04/18 00:18, , 6F
04/18 00:18, 6F
→
04/18 00:18, , 7F
04/18 00:18, 7F
→
04/18 00:19, , 8F
04/18 00:19, 8F
→
04/18 00:20, , 9F
04/18 00:20, 9F
→
04/18 00:22, , 10F
04/18 00:22, 10F
→
04/18 00:22, , 11F
04/18 00:22, 11F
→
04/18 00:28, , 12F
04/18 00:28, 12F
→
04/18 00:29, , 13F
04/18 00:29, 13F
→
04/18 00:30, , 14F
04/18 00:30, 14F
→
04/18 00:49, , 15F
04/18 00:49, 15F
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 01:14:25
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 01:14:39
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 01:21:32
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 01:22:12
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 01:22:49
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 02:35:21
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.93.65), 04/18/2015 02:35:42
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 6 篇)：
