Re: [問題] 台灣的主權到底屬於誰?

看板PublicIssue作者 (hihi)時間9年前 (2015/04/11 04:30), 9年前編輯推噓-1(011)
留言2則, 1人參與, 最新討論串12/24 (看更多)
Department of State, Conference for the Conclusion and Signature of the Treaty of Peace with Japan: Record of Proceedings, September 4–8, 1951 (Washington, Government Printing Office, 1951). 這本書我有買回來也掃瞄過, 這是美國國務院的出版的書籍, (檔案很大,請斟酌下載) http://www.zenbowlawfirm.com/pdf/SFPTpage.pdf page 94 We have agreed to the renunciation of Japanese sovereignty over the Kurile Islands, but we think that this comparison should be borne in mind by those who criticize the provisions relating to the more southerly of the Ryukyus, and to the Bonin Islands. 既然嫌我翻譯爛請自己翻. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.10.165.88 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1428697856.A.A6C.html

04/11 08:11, , 1F
這不是很清楚嗎?承認日本放棄千島群島主權。哪來的剩餘
04/11 08:11, 1F

04/11 08:14, , 2F
主權?另外,你不提供翻譯可能有違反板規的問題喔。 :)
04/11 08:14, 2F
你英文不是很強? 你翻翻看. ※ 編輯: saveme (27.247.14.145), 04/11/2015 22:30:55
文章代碼(AID): #1LA3C0fi (PublicIssue)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1LA3C0fi (PublicIssue)