[閒聊] 道館為什麼要設計成攻、守完全失衡?
Pokemon Go除了抓寶搜集圖鑑外
另外就是道館挑戰
可是目前的道館戰攻、守兩端完全失衡
以100%來說....攻方少說也佔了95%的優勢吧....
真要打的話防守方根本不可能守住
這樣感覺還是少了樣樂趣!
目前的制度是
挑戰方一律是帶6隻挑戰道館
道館大多也只是2~4層而已
所以挑戰方在數量上就佔很大的優勢了
我是覺得可以改成
道館有幾層就帶幾隻
挑戰方不需要有數量上的優勢
挑戰方能換屬性上有利的去挑戰就已經先贏一半了.....
原作裡也是這樣演
可用的隻數一樣只有挑戰方能更換
還有另一個我更不懂的設定
挑戰方可以多隻圍毆一隻.......
原作裡正式的對戰從來都是1 vs 1....
多隻圍毆一隻
防守的隨便也被秒殺....
為什麼道館要設計成這樣完全失衡阿?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.227.233.179
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PokemonGO/M.1475034452.A.566.html
推
09/28 11:48, , 1F
09/28 11:48, 1F
推
09/28 11:49, , 2F
09/28 11:49, 2F
噓
09/28 11:50, , 3F
09/28 11:50, 3F
推
09/28 11:50, , 4F
09/28 11:50, 4F
推
09/28 11:50, , 5F
09/28 11:50, 5F
→
09/28 11:51, , 6F
09/28 11:51, 6F
推
09/28 11:51, , 7F
09/28 11:51, 7F
推
09/28 11:51, , 8F
09/28 11:51, 8F
→
09/28 11:51, , 9F
09/28 11:51, 9F
→
09/28 11:51, , 10F
09/28 11:51, 10F
推
09/28 11:52, , 11F
09/28 11:52, 11F
→
09/28 11:52, , 12F
09/28 11:52, 12F
推
09/28 11:52, , 13F
09/28 11:52, 13F
→
09/28 11:52, , 14F
09/28 11:52, 14F
→
09/28 11:52, , 15F
09/28 11:52, 15F
→
09/28 11:52, , 16F
09/28 11:52, 16F
→
09/28 11:53, , 17F
09/28 11:53, 17F
→
09/28 11:54, , 18F
09/28 11:54, 18F
→
09/28 11:54, , 19F
09/28 11:54, 19F
推
09/28 11:54, , 20F
09/28 11:54, 20F
→
09/28 11:55, , 21F
09/28 11:55, 21F
→
09/28 11:56, , 22F
09/28 11:56, 22F
→
09/28 11:57, , 23F
09/28 11:57, 23F
推
09/28 11:58, , 24F
09/28 11:58, 24F
→
09/28 11:59, , 25F
09/28 11:59, 25F
→
09/28 12:00, , 26F
09/28 12:00, 26F
→
09/28 12:00, , 27F
09/28 12:00, 27F
→
09/28 12:01, , 28F
09/28 12:01, 28F
→
09/28 12:02, , 29F
09/28 12:02, 29F
→
09/28 12:03, , 30F
09/28 12:03, 30F
→
09/28 12:06, , 31F
09/28 12:06, 31F
→
09/28 12:07, , 32F
09/28 12:07, 32F
→
09/28 12:07, , 33F
09/28 12:07, 33F
推
09/28 12:08, , 34F
09/28 12:08, 34F
→
09/28 12:08, , 35F
09/28 12:08, 35F
推
09/28 12:09, , 36F
09/28 12:09, 36F
推
09/28 12:09, , 37F
09/28 12:09, 37F
噓
09/28 12:10, , 38F
09/28 12:10, 38F
→
09/28 12:10, , 39F
09/28 12:10, 39F
還有 92 則推文
→
09/28 13:19, , 132F
09/28 13:19, 132F
→
09/28 13:20, , 133F
09/28 13:20, 133F
→
09/28 13:20, , 134F
09/28 13:20, 134F
→
09/28 13:20, , 135F
09/28 13:20, 135F
→
09/28 13:20, , 136F
09/28 13:20, 136F
→
09/28 13:20, , 137F
09/28 13:20, 137F
→
09/28 13:20, , 138F
09/28 13:20, 138F
→
09/28 13:21, , 139F
09/28 13:21, 139F
→
09/28 13:22, , 140F
09/28 13:22, 140F
→
09/28 13:22, , 141F
09/28 13:22, 141F
推
09/28 13:24, , 142F
09/28 13:24, 142F
→
09/28 13:28, , 143F
09/28 13:28, 143F
推
09/28 13:28, , 144F
09/28 13:28, 144F
→
09/28 13:29, , 145F
09/28 13:29, 145F
推
09/28 13:31, , 146F
09/28 13:31, 146F
推
09/28 13:34, , 147F
09/28 13:34, 147F
→
09/28 13:35, , 148F
09/28 13:35, 148F
推
09/28 13:41, , 149F
09/28 13:41, 149F
→
09/28 13:41, , 150F
09/28 13:41, 150F
→
09/28 13:42, , 151F
09/28 13:42, 151F
→
09/28 13:42, , 152F
09/28 13:42, 152F
→
09/28 13:43, , 153F
09/28 13:43, 153F
推
09/28 13:50, , 154F
09/28 13:50, 154F
→
09/28 13:51, , 155F
09/28 13:51, 155F
推
09/28 14:10, , 156F
09/28 14:10, 156F
推
09/28 14:33, , 157F
09/28 14:33, 157F
→
09/28 14:34, , 158F
09/28 14:34, 158F
→
09/28 14:36, , 159F
09/28 14:36, 159F
→
09/28 14:36, , 160F
09/28 14:36, 160F
推
09/28 14:43, , 161F
09/28 14:43, 161F
→
09/28 14:44, , 162F
09/28 14:44, 162F
推
09/28 15:27, , 163F
09/28 15:27, 163F
推
09/28 15:58, , 164F
09/28 15:58, 164F
推
09/28 16:23, , 165F
09/28 16:23, 165F
→
09/28 17:01, , 166F
09/28 17:01, 166F
噓
09/28 18:33, , 167F
09/28 18:33, 167F
噓
09/28 19:16, , 168F
09/28 19:16, 168F
推
09/28 21:56, , 169F
09/28 21:56, 169F
推
09/29 05:24, , 170F
09/29 05:24, 170F
→
09/29 10:00, , 171F
09/29 10:00, 171F
討論串 (同標題文章)