[討論] IV和CPMAX
如果兩隻一樣的pokemon..
技能也一樣..
問大家的意見要練哪隻..
得到的答案通常會是IV高的那隻..
不過..
有人會仔細看過三圍嗎?
因為IV高的CPMAX不一定會比較高..
舉例來說..
三圍10,15,14的IV是87%
三圍15,10,10的IV是78%
但是同樣等級的情況下..
IV78的CP會高於IV87..
原因是CP計算時攻擊的加權比較高..
而攻擊在實際對戰是否影響值真的最大..
要作實驗我想也不容易..
選擇IV高為了未來CP成長值..
結果因為這樣的情況反而CPMAX較低..
還是說乾脆都看CPMAX決定要練誰就好?
雖然說這樣的情況IV值差距大多在10%以內就是了..
因為要舉更極端的例子..
攻擊那一項的差距會更大..
通常IV也更容易低於80%了..
當然..
找個IV100%..
就沒有這些問題了XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 124.218.35.63
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PokemonGO/M.1474169261.A.174.html
→
09/18 11:29, , 1F
09/18 11:29, 1F
→
09/18 11:29, , 2F
09/18 11:29, 2F
推
09/18 11:29, , 3F
09/18 11:29, 3F
→
09/18 11:30, , 4F
09/18 11:30, 4F
噓
09/18 11:31, , 5F
09/18 11:31, 5F
→
09/18 11:31, , 6F
09/18 11:31, 6F
→
09/18 11:31, , 7F
09/18 11:31, 7F
推
09/18 11:32, , 8F
09/18 11:32, 8F
→
09/18 11:32, , 9F
09/18 11:32, 9F
→
09/18 11:32, , 10F
09/18 11:32, 10F
→
09/18 11:32, , 11F
09/18 11:32, 11F
噓
09/18 11:32, , 12F
09/18 11:32, 12F
→
09/18 11:32, , 13F
09/18 11:32, 13F
→
09/18 11:33, , 14F
09/18 11:33, 14F
推
09/18 11:33, , 15F
09/18 11:33, 15F
推
09/18 11:33, , 16F
09/18 11:33, 16F
→
09/18 11:34, , 17F
09/18 11:34, 17F
→
09/18 11:34, , 18F
09/18 11:34, 18F
推
09/18 11:34, , 19F
09/18 11:34, 19F
推
09/18 11:34, , 20F
09/18 11:34, 20F
→
09/18 11:34, , 21F
09/18 11:34, 21F
→
09/18 11:34, , 22F
09/18 11:34, 22F
推
09/18 11:35, , 23F
09/18 11:35, 23F
→
09/18 11:35, , 24F
09/18 11:35, 24F
→
09/18 11:35, , 25F
09/18 11:35, 25F
→
09/18 11:36, , 26F
09/18 11:36, 26F
推
09/18 11:36, , 27F
09/18 11:36, 27F
→
09/18 11:36, , 28F
09/18 11:36, 28F
→
09/18 11:36, , 29F
09/18 11:36, 29F
→
09/18 11:36, , 30F
09/18 11:36, 30F
→
09/18 11:36, , 31F
09/18 11:36, 31F
→
09/18 11:36, , 32F
09/18 11:36, 32F
推
09/18 11:36, , 33F
09/18 11:36, 33F
→
09/18 11:36, , 34F
09/18 11:36, 34F
噓
09/18 11:37, , 35F
09/18 11:37, 35F
→
09/18 11:37, , 36F
09/18 11:37, 36F
→
09/18 11:37, , 37F
09/18 11:37, 37F
→
09/18 11:37, , 38F
09/18 11:37, 38F
→
09/18 11:37, , 39F
09/18 11:37, 39F
還有 94 則推文
推
09/18 12:36, , 134F
09/18 12:36, 134F
→
09/18 12:37, , 135F
09/18 12:37, 135F
噓
09/18 12:37, , 136F
09/18 12:37, 136F
推
09/18 12:37, , 137F
09/18 12:37, 137F
推
09/18 12:37, , 138F
09/18 12:37, 138F
→
09/18 12:37, , 139F
09/18 12:37, 139F
→
09/18 12:37, , 140F
09/18 12:37, 140F
→
09/18 12:38, , 141F
09/18 12:38, 141F
推
09/18 12:39, , 142F
09/18 12:39, 142F
→
09/18 12:39, , 143F
09/18 12:39, 143F
推
09/18 12:39, , 144F
09/18 12:39, 144F
→
09/18 12:40, , 145F
09/18 12:40, 145F
→
09/18 12:43, , 146F
09/18 12:43, 146F
推
09/18 12:44, , 147F
09/18 12:44, 147F
→
09/18 12:44, , 148F
09/18 12:44, 148F
→
09/18 12:46, , 149F
09/18 12:46, 149F
→
09/18 12:47, , 150F
09/18 12:47, 150F
噓
09/18 12:47, , 151F
09/18 12:47, 151F
→
09/18 12:47, , 152F
09/18 12:47, 152F
→
09/18 12:48, , 153F
09/18 12:48, 153F
→
09/18 12:49, , 154F
09/18 12:49, 154F
→
09/18 12:51, , 155F
09/18 12:51, 155F
推
09/18 12:52, , 156F
09/18 12:52, 156F
推
09/18 12:54, , 157F
09/18 12:54, 157F
推
09/18 12:57, , 158F
09/18 12:57, 158F
推
09/18 13:05, , 159F
09/18 13:05, 159F
推
09/18 13:08, , 160F
09/18 13:08, 160F
推
09/18 13:52, , 161F
09/18 13:52, 161F
→
09/18 14:13, , 162F
09/18 14:13, 162F
推
09/18 14:19, , 163F
09/18 14:19, 163F
→
09/18 14:19, , 164F
09/18 14:19, 164F
→
09/18 14:24, , 165F
09/18 14:24, 165F
→
09/18 14:24, , 166F
09/18 14:24, 166F
→
09/18 14:25, , 167F
09/18 14:25, 167F
推
09/18 15:28, , 168F
09/18 15:28, 168F
推
09/18 15:47, , 169F
09/18 15:47, 169F
→
09/18 15:48, , 170F
09/18 15:48, 170F
噓
09/18 21:51, , 171F
09/18 21:51, 171F
→
09/19 01:25, , 172F
09/19 01:25, 172F
→
09/19 01:25, , 173F
09/19 01:25, 173F
討論串 (同標題文章)