[討論] 醉飲皇龍的實力?
大家都知道羅侯當初被刀無后、滄海
平、醉飲皇龍三人聯手殺死,刀、滄
兩人之後偷襲醉飲皇龍導致他重傷,
並掩蓋了皇龍有幫忙的實情。
滄海平輕易的死在天刀手裡,
刀無后被醉飲皇龍貶低他不如刀無極,刀法平庸。
這兩人的實力應該明顯不到刀龍的等級,
但加一個醉飲皇龍就可以無傷完敗殺除羅侯。
比照羅侯跟千葉、漠刀、刀無極三人
打的時侯,是兩中等傷勢、
一無傷的情形。
(以上是記憶,錯誤請指正)
醉飲皇龍的實力根據這些劇情判斷應
該是刀龍之首沒錯,
在御天五龍的設定上來說,
天尊皇胤的實力應該也是
勝於其他刀龍。
在表現上,醉飲皇龍跟很多強者
都能打成平手,
有邪天之力與刀龍戰袍的刀無極、
楓岫主人、火宅女殺手。
其他刀龍,如天刀、漠刀、瘋刀等不
太可能有這實力,
最後的一戰,一招逼退滅度二宗,
在佛業雙身聯手下
仍可以砍傷其中一人。
個人感覺醉飲皇龍到死前都
沒有破格。
至於很多版友都感覺醉飲皇龍
實力沒啥發揮或是破格得很嚴重。
可能是一開始就太高估醉飲皇龍了,
畢竟是斬殺羅侯的神話人物。
--
posted from android bbs reader on my samsung GT-I5801
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.bbs.reader
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.10.31.150
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Palmar_Drama/M.1418370256.A.5F2.html
推
12/12 15:50, , 1F
12/12 15:50, 1F
→
12/12 15:51, , 2F
12/12 15:51, 2F
→
12/12 15:54, , 3F
12/12 15:54, 3F
推
12/12 15:55, , 4F
12/12 15:55, 4F
→
12/12 15:56, , 5F
12/12 15:56, 5F
→
12/12 15:56, , 6F
12/12 15:56, 6F
推
12/12 16:03, , 7F
12/12 16:03, 7F
→
12/12 16:04, , 8F
12/12 16:04, 8F
推
12/12 16:04, , 9F
12/12 16:04, 9F
→
12/12 16:04, , 10F
12/12 16:04, 10F
推
12/12 16:06, , 11F
12/12 16:06, 11F
推
12/12 16:06, , 12F
12/12 16:06, 12F
推
12/12 16:07, , 13F
12/12 16:07, 13F
→
12/12 16:07, , 14F
12/12 16:07, 14F
推
12/12 16:11, , 15F
12/12 16:11, 15F
推
12/12 16:12, , 16F
12/12 16:12, 16F
→
12/12 16:14, , 17F
12/12 16:14, 17F
推
12/12 16:15, , 18F
12/12 16:15, 18F
推
12/12 16:17, , 19F
12/12 16:17, 19F
→
12/12 16:17, , 20F
12/12 16:17, 20F
→
12/12 16:18, , 21F
12/12 16:18, 21F
→
12/12 16:18, , 22F
12/12 16:18, 22F
推
12/12 16:19, , 23F
12/12 16:19, 23F
→
12/12 16:20, , 24F
12/12 16:20, 24F
推
12/12 16:21, , 25F
12/12 16:21, 25F
推
12/12 16:25, , 26F
12/12 16:25, 26F
推
12/12 16:25, , 27F
12/12 16:25, 27F
推
12/12 16:35, , 28F
12/12 16:35, 28F
推
12/12 16:37, , 29F
12/12 16:37, 29F
推
12/12 16:37, , 30F
12/12 16:37, 30F
推
12/12 16:38, , 31F
12/12 16:38, 31F
推
12/12 16:46, , 32F
12/12 16:46, 32F
推
12/12 16:46, , 33F
12/12 16:46, 33F
推
12/12 16:47, , 34F
12/12 16:47, 34F
推
12/12 16:47, , 35F
12/12 16:47, 35F
推
12/12 16:58, , 36F
12/12 16:58, 36F
→
12/12 17:01, , 37F
12/12 17:01, 37F
→
12/12 17:02, , 38F
12/12 17:02, 38F
→
12/12 17:02, , 39F
12/12 17:02, 39F
還有 59 則推文
→
12/12 21:48, , 99F
12/12 21:48, 99F
→
12/12 22:08, , 100F
12/12 22:08, 100F
→
12/12 22:08, , 101F
12/12 22:08, 101F
推
12/12 22:33, , 102F
12/12 22:33, 102F
→
12/12 22:58, , 103F
12/12 22:58, 103F
→
12/12 22:59, , 104F
12/12 22:59, 104F
→
12/12 23:00, , 105F
12/12 23:00, 105F
→
12/12 23:09, , 106F
12/12 23:09, 106F
→
12/12 23:11, , 107F
12/12 23:11, 107F
→
12/12 23:11, , 108F
12/12 23:11, 108F
→
12/12 23:12, , 109F
12/12 23:12, 109F
→
12/12 23:13, , 110F
12/12 23:13, 110F
推
12/12 23:20, , 111F
12/12 23:20, 111F
推
12/12 23:24, , 112F
12/12 23:24, 112F
→
12/12 23:35, , 113F
12/12 23:35, 113F
→
12/12 23:46, , 114F
12/12 23:46, 114F
→
12/12 23:47, , 115F
12/12 23:47, 115F
推
12/13 00:14, , 116F
12/13 00:14, 116F
推
12/13 06:21, , 117F
12/13 06:21, 117F
→
12/13 06:23, , 118F
12/13 06:23, 118F
→
12/13 06:24, , 119F
12/13 06:24, 119F
→
12/13 06:25, , 120F
12/13 06:25, 120F
推
12/13 10:44, , 121F
12/13 10:44, 121F
推
12/13 11:12, , 122F
12/13 11:12, 122F
→
12/13 11:12, , 123F
12/13 11:12, 123F
推
12/13 11:48, , 124F
12/13 11:48, 124F
推
12/13 12:25, , 125F
12/13 12:25, 125F
推
12/13 12:39, , 126F
12/13 12:39, 126F
推
12/13 12:48, , 127F
12/13 12:48, 127F
→
12/13 12:49, , 128F
12/13 12:49, 128F
→
12/13 12:53, , 129F
12/13 12:53, 129F
→
12/13 12:53, , 130F
12/13 12:53, 130F
推
12/13 12:55, , 131F
12/13 12:55, 131F
推
12/13 16:40, , 132F
12/13 16:40, 132F
推
12/13 16:41, , 133F
12/13 16:41, 133F
→
12/13 18:45, , 134F
12/13 18:45, 134F
→
12/13 18:45, , 135F
12/13 18:45, 135F
→
12/13 23:51, , 136F
12/13 23:51, 136F
推
12/14 22:43, , 137F
12/14 22:43, 137F
推
12/15 10:49, , 138F
12/15 10:49, 138F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
討論
6
26
討論
21
34
討論
12
26
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):
討論
71
138
討論
6
26
討論
21
34
討論
12
26