Re: [情報] 稀有27吋240Hz【宏碁】PredatorXB272到貨
※ 引述《ultra120 (原廠打手 !!!)》之銘言:
: MOMO 限量補貨
: 要搶要快
: 神級刷新率▼極速240
: 【acer】Predator XB272 27型 G-Sync 240Hz 電競螢幕
: 北北基桃園市地區 【12小時速達】 中午12點前下單付款,當日晚上8點前到貨
: 品號:4760823
: 3D顯示技術
: 1ms極速反應時間
: G-Sync技術 同步刷新
: 測試文
: https://www.cnet.com/products/acer-predator-xb2-xb272/review/
: https://www.mobile01.com/newsdetail/22000/acer-predator-xb272-240hz-nvidia-gsync-gaming-tn-fhd
: 稀有尺寸 27 吋 + 240Hz + G-SYNC + 故意的 TN 1 豪秒
: 電競完美解析度 1920x1080P
: 華碩/DELL/AOC/ 也沒有這種競品規格等級尺寸 輸
從這篇底下推文就可以看出電蝦板喜歡無腦亂放砲的有多少,太可笑
真不曉得這板有些人哪來有臉整天霸凌大師和C52
看看這邊,被一台螢幕激怒的一堆憤宅
→
09/18 19:37,
09/18 19:37
推
09/18 19:38,
09/18 19:38
噓
09/18 19:43,
09/18 19:43
噓
09/18 19:59,
09/18 19:59
→
09/18 20:00,
09/18 20:00
→
09/18 20:05,
09/18 20:05
→
09/18 20:07,
09/18 20:07
→
09/18 20:14,
09/18 20:14
懂懂懂你個大姨媽,240Hz懂?目前240Hz就只有TN懂?
看到TN就開槍,TN就是最適合電競懂?
https://i.imgur.com/OpAI3eY.jpg
這是TFT Central過去的評測數據
這張就是說明為啥TN比較適合電競的原因
剛好原篇底下也有人提到VA
Z35剛好就是VA,更剛好也是宏碁做的
看那響應時間,有多長就有多悲劇
沒見過的,想看真實螢幕情況的,YouTube找找Z35 ghosting,就知道多慘
再者
以我個人親身經驗,雖然我沒用過XB272,不過我有PG278Q
PG278Q也是TN,但是我得說PG278Q跟一般市面常見的6 BIT爛TN比起來好太多了
我用了這麼久最不能接受的只有近看會微泛白,還有無解的可視角和不能躺著玩而已
整體表現,高階TN仍不及IPS,但也絕對沒有到會讓人看一眼就受不了崩潰的程度
這些人真正用過的不知道有幾個
總體而言我只能說這類高階TN螢幕,對比一般常見的TN真的好很多
沒有一堆人說的講得那麼誇張,好像看一眼TN眼睛就要爛掉一樣
--
→
11/16 19:21,
11/16 19:21
→
11/16 19:24,
11/16 19:24
→
11/16 19:24,
11/16 19:24
→
11/16 19:25,
11/16 19:25
→
11/16 19:25,
11/16 19:25
→
11/16 19:32,
11/16 19:32
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.166.213.201
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1505741063.A.895.html
推
09/18 21:28, , 1F
09/18 21:28, 1F
推
09/18 21:34, , 2F
09/18 21:34, 2F
→
09/18 21:34, , 3F
09/18 21:34, 3F
推
09/18 21:35, , 4F
09/18 21:35, 4F
發這篇文用意是
實在是太多人因為對低階TN有刻板印象
進而以為以為全部TN都是那麼糟糕
這是不對的
我覺得這樣TN有點像被霸凌
推
09/18 21:41, , 5F
09/18 21:41, 5F
推
09/18 21:41, , 6F
09/18 21:41, 6F
→
09/18 21:42, , 7F
09/18 21:42, 7F
同意,我也是覺得高階TN並不輸中低階IPS/VA
推
09/18 21:42, , 8F
09/18 21:42, 8F
推
09/18 21:42, , 9F
09/18 21:42, 9F
推
09/18 21:43, , 10F
09/18 21:43, 10F
推
09/18 21:43, , 11F
09/18 21:43, 11F
→
09/18 21:44, , 12F
09/18 21:44, 12F
推
09/18 21:49, , 13F
09/18 21:49, 13F
推
09/18 21:51, , 14F
09/18 21:51, 14F
→
09/18 21:52, , 15F
09/18 21:52, 15F
真的,非常同意,低階TN真的非常糟糕
尤其是市面上一大堆廉價低階筆電又非常愛用那種低階TN面板
每每看到那種螢幕我也是不忍直視
可能也實在是太多人對低階TN的刻板印象造成以為全部TN都是那麼糟糕
推
09/18 21:54, , 16F
09/18 21:54, 16F
說你吧
推
09/18 21:57, , 17F
09/18 21:57, 17F
不不不,在這板論講話的份量,我離稱得上大大還很遠
推
09/18 21:58, , 18F
09/18 21:58, 18F
還有 22 則推文
還有 3 段內文
→
09/18 23:18, , 41F
09/18 23:18, 41F
推
09/18 23:30, , 42F
09/18 23:30, 42F
推
09/18 23:42, , 43F
09/18 23:42, 43F
→
09/19 00:05, , 44F
09/19 00:05, 44F
→
09/19 00:05, , 45F
09/19 00:05, 45F
→
09/19 00:23, , 46F
09/19 00:23, 46F
→
09/19 00:23, , 47F
09/19 00:23, 47F
推
09/19 00:25, , 48F
09/19 00:25, 48F
推
09/19 00:29, , 49F
09/19 00:29, 49F
推
09/19 00:30, , 50F
09/19 00:30, 50F
→
09/19 00:30, , 51F
09/19 00:30, 51F
→
09/19 00:31, , 52F
09/19 00:31, 52F
推
09/19 01:06, , 53F
09/19 01:06, 53F
→
09/19 01:10, , 54F
09/19 01:10, 54F
→
09/19 01:12, , 55F
09/19 01:12, 55F
推
09/19 01:30, , 56F
09/19 01:30, 56F
→
09/19 02:37, , 57F
09/19 02:37, 57F
推
09/19 02:50, , 58F
09/19 02:50, 58F
推
09/19 07:48, , 59F
09/19 07:48, 59F
→
09/19 07:53, , 60F
09/19 07:53, 60F
→
09/19 08:16, , 61F
09/19 08:16, 61F
推
09/19 09:28, , 62F
09/19 09:28, 62F
→
09/19 09:38, , 63F
09/19 09:38, 63F
→
09/19 09:39, , 64F
09/19 09:39, 64F
→
09/19 11:14, , 65F
09/19 11:14, 65F
推
09/19 11:32, , 66F
09/19 11:32, 66F
→
09/19 12:27, , 67F
09/19 12:27, 67F
推
09/19 12:47, , 68F
09/19 12:47, 68F
推
09/19 13:31, , 69F
09/19 13:31, 69F
推
09/19 15:36, , 70F
09/19 15:36, 70F
→
09/19 15:36, , 71F
09/19 15:36, 71F
推
09/19 15:38, , 72F
09/19 15:38, 72F
→
09/19 15:38, , 73F
09/19 15:38, 73F
推
09/19 17:29, , 74F
09/19 17:29, 74F
→
09/19 17:29, , 75F
09/19 17:29, 75F
推
09/19 19:16, , 76F
09/19 19:16, 76F
推
09/19 19:39, , 77F
09/19 19:39, 77F
推
09/20 05:33, , 78F
09/20 05:33, 78F
推
09/20 10:16, , 79F
09/20 10:16, 79F
推
09/22 11:00, , 80F
09/22 11:00, 80F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):