[情報] 超頻玩家批 X299真發燒:簡直災難
超頻玩家批Intel X299發燒平台真發燒:簡直災難
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/538/538425.htm
Intel最近大張旗鼓地推出了新一代發燒平台,包括Skylake-X、Kaby Lake-X處理器和
X299主板,最多做到了18核心,成功反制最多16核心的AMD Ryzen。
不過,首批上市的只會到10核心,首發評測的更是4/8核心為主,更多核心還得慢慢等,
18核心甚至可能要到明年。
很顯然,新平台的發布有些匆忙,由此也帶來了一些問題。國外著名超頻玩家“der8auer
”就對新平台的表現很不滿意,在YouTube上發布了一段視頻,公開提出批評。
der8auer指出,Intel將發佈時間從8月提前到6月,來的非常突然,讓主板廠商“幾乎沒
有任何時間開發足夠好的產品”,結果帶來了一場完完全全的“供電災難”( VRM
Disaster),對此Intel和主板廠商要各負50%的責任。
他認為,目前各家的X299主板由於都是匆忙上陣,在供電質量、散熱設計上完全沒有統一
性。
第一次測試中,他在一塊技嘉Aorus X299主板上超頻一顆完全能跑到5.0GHz的處理器,結
果甚至無法穩定超到4.6GHz,而且VRM供電電路溫度極高,因為散熱設計很不合理,感覺
根本沒用。
後來他又換了微星的一塊板子,結果也類似。
der8auer還批評很多X299主板只提供了一個8針EPS輔助供電接口,完全不夠用,結果導致
供電線在空閒狀態下溫度都能達到65℃。
不過這一點還有爭議,因為有電源廠商指出,不合格的供電線設計也有責任。
der8auer總結說,對於目前的X299主板,他還沒有找到哪一款特別值得推薦,因為在供電
散熱方面多多少少都有些問題。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7BqAjC4ZCc
--
大膽!竟敢批評 Intel,一定都是板廠不用心做 X299
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.224.65.117
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1498714712.A.2AA.html
※ 編輯: KotoriCute (61.224.65.117), 06/29/2017 13:39:22
推
06/29 13:40, , 1F
06/29 13:40, 1F
推
06/29 13:41, , 2F
06/29 13:41, 2F
推
06/29 13:42, , 3F
06/29 13:42, 3F
推
06/29 13:42, , 4F
06/29 13:42, 4F
推
06/29 13:43, , 5F
06/29 13:43, 5F
推
06/29 13:45, , 6F
06/29 13:45, 6F
推
06/29 13:46, , 7F
06/29 13:46, 7F
推
06/29 13:49, , 8F
06/29 13:49, 8F
推
06/29 13:54, , 9F
06/29 13:54, 9F
推
06/29 13:55, , 10F
06/29 13:55, 10F
→
06/29 13:55, , 11F
06/29 13:55, 11F
推
06/29 13:55, , 12F
06/29 13:55, 12F
→
06/29 13:55, , 13F
06/29 13:55, 13F
→
06/29 13:56, , 14F
06/29 13:56, 14F
→
06/29 13:56, , 15F
06/29 13:56, 15F
推
06/29 13:57, , 16F
06/29 13:57, 16F
→
06/29 14:00, , 17F
06/29 14:00, 17F
→
06/29 14:03, , 18F
06/29 14:03, 18F
噓
06/29 14:04, , 19F
06/29 14:04, 19F
→
06/29 14:04, , 20F
06/29 14:04, 20F
推
06/29 14:05, , 21F
06/29 14:05, 21F
推
06/29 14:06, , 22F
06/29 14:06, 22F
推
06/29 14:07, , 23F
06/29 14:07, 23F
推
06/29 14:12, , 24F
06/29 14:12, 24F
推
06/29 14:12, , 25F
06/29 14:12, 25F
推
06/29 14:13, , 26F
06/29 14:13, 26F
推
06/29 14:13, , 27F
06/29 14:13, 27F
推
06/29 14:13, , 28F
06/29 14:13, 28F
→
06/29 14:14, , 29F
06/29 14:14, 29F
推
06/29 14:15, , 30F
06/29 14:15, 30F
推
06/29 14:16, , 31F
06/29 14:16, 31F
推
06/29 14:19, , 32F
06/29 14:19, 32F
推
06/29 14:20, , 33F
06/29 14:20, 33F
推
06/29 14:20, , 34F
06/29 14:20, 34F
推
06/29 14:20, , 35F
06/29 14:20, 35F
推
06/29 14:22, , 36F
06/29 14:22, 36F
推
06/29 14:25, , 37F
06/29 14:25, 37F
推
06/29 14:28, , 38F
06/29 14:28, 38F
→
06/29 14:28, , 39F
06/29 14:28, 39F
還有 366 則推文
推
06/29 19:49, , 406F
06/29 19:49, 406F
→
06/29 19:56, , 407F
06/29 19:56, 407F
推
06/29 19:56, , 408F
06/29 19:56, 408F
→
06/29 19:57, , 409F
06/29 19:57, 409F
推
06/29 20:00, , 410F
06/29 20:00, 410F
→
06/29 20:00, , 411F
06/29 20:00, 411F
→
06/29 20:01, , 412F
06/29 20:01, 412F
→
06/29 20:01, , 413F
06/29 20:01, 413F
→
06/29 20:02, , 414F
06/29 20:02, 414F
推
06/29 20:04, , 415F
06/29 20:04, 415F
推
06/29 20:04, , 416F
06/29 20:04, 416F
→
06/29 20:06, , 417F
06/29 20:06, 417F
→
06/29 20:07, , 418F
06/29 20:07, 418F
→
06/29 20:07, , 419F
06/29 20:07, 419F
→
06/29 20:08, , 420F
06/29 20:08, 420F
→
06/29 20:08, , 421F
06/29 20:08, 421F
→
06/29 20:08, , 422F
06/29 20:08, 422F
→
06/29 20:14, , 423F
06/29 20:14, 423F
推
06/29 20:17, , 424F
06/29 20:17, 424F
→
06/29 20:19, , 425F
06/29 20:19, 425F
→
06/29 20:24, , 426F
06/29 20:24, 426F
→
06/29 20:27, , 427F
06/29 20:27, 427F
→
06/29 20:28, , 428F
06/29 20:28, 428F
推
06/29 20:30, , 429F
06/29 20:30, 429F
→
06/29 20:31, , 430F
06/29 20:31, 430F
→
06/29 20:31, , 431F
06/29 20:31, 431F
推
06/29 20:35, , 432F
06/29 20:35, 432F
推
06/29 20:49, , 433F
06/29 20:49, 433F
→
06/29 21:08, , 434F
06/29 21:08, 434F
推
06/29 21:53, , 435F
06/29 21:53, 435F
→
06/29 21:55, , 436F
06/29 21:55, 436F
→
06/29 21:55, , 437F
06/29 21:55, 437F
推
06/29 21:57, , 438F
06/29 21:57, 438F
推
06/30 01:21, , 439F
06/30 01:21, 439F
推
06/30 03:37, , 440F
06/30 03:37, 440F
→
06/30 03:38, , 441F
06/30 03:38, 441F
推
06/30 06:38, , 442F
06/30 06:38, 442F
→
06/30 06:42, , 443F
06/30 06:42, 443F
→
06/30 09:25, , 444F
06/30 09:25, 444F
→
06/30 14:54, , 445F
06/30 14:54, 445F