Re: [心得] 徵求分享BT軟體的心得
網路上看到的，權當參考吧...
http://torrentfreak.com/bittorrent-client-comparison/
BitTorrent Client Comparison
Written by Ernesto on April 22, 2006
What is the best BitTorrent client? Although it’s not an easy question to
answer, we will give it a try. We compared more than 20 BitTorrent clients
(windows) on 9 features and the overall impression. Some features are of course
more important that others, depending on the users needs.
The following features are considered in this comparison:
Essential features:
There are a couple of features that every client should have. How important
these features are depends on your personal preferences and usage of
BitTorrent. If you use BitTorrent only to download linux distro’s “RSS support
” is probably not that important to you. However, if you use BitTorrent to
download TV-shows you might consider RSS support as an essential feature.
Overall these nine features are considered more or less essential.
Priotarization: Is the client able to assign download priorities to the
torrents? This option allows you to assign more bandwidth to a torrent.
DHT: Does the client support “trackerless” torrents. DHT keeps the torrent
alive if the tracker goes offline.
Selective Downloading: Can you select files within the torrent that you want to
download (or not). Can be very useful to check samples (most movies have
samples) or to download 1 album out of a “complete discography” torrent.
Encryption: Does the client support “protocol encryption”. To protect
yourself against traffic shaping / throttling ISP’s.
Tracker: Does the client have a (built in) tracker. Can be useful if you’re
publishing torrents.
Remote Control: Does it support (web based) remote control. A web Gui allows
you to access your torrents from any computer in the world.
Super Seeding: Are you able to super seed. Super seeding is different (more
efficient) from seeding because it tries to send out pieces of the file that
have not been sent before.
RSS: Does the client have RSS support. With RSS you can automatically download
your favorite torrents.
UPnP Port Mapping: Is there UPnP support. If your router supports UPnP, you don
’t need to forward any ports
A quick comparison on these features shows us that only six clients (that I’m
aware of) support more than half of the features.
ABC (5)
Azureus (9)
Bitcomet (7)
Bittornado (5)
uTorrent (9)
XBT (6)
Here are the results. I have experience with all 6 clients mentioned here and
came to the following conclusion.
1st place: uTorrent
uTorrent is the absolute winner, without a doubt. It supports all the features
that I mentioned. Is is extremely lightweight, it uses only 7000K memory
instead of 50.000K that a clean install of Azureus uses.
Another great option, especially for starting users, is the “setup wizard”
that helps you to configure uTorrent’s settings.
uTorrent is actively under development and the developers carefully listen to
their users.
uTorrent supports 9 out of 9 features.
2nd place: Azureus
Azureus is the runner up. They do support all the features that are listed
(some via plugins), Azureus and uTorrent are in fact the only clients that
support all these features. Azureus is a great client, and especially for those
who don’t care about memory and cpu usage but like to get all kinds of fancy
features to pimp up their BitTorrent client.
But it uses 7x as much memory as uTorrent, and requires Java, which some people
might consider a problem.
Azureus has an outstanding dev team that is constantly improving their client,
the runner up, but a really great one.
Azureus supports 9 out of 9 features.
3rd place: Bitcomet and XBT
Bitcomet and XBT are two totally different clients.
Bitcomet had some troubles in the past and was banned from several private
trackers for ignoring the “private flag”. In the meanwhile those problems are
solved and Bitcomet is regaining its credibility. It removed the IE toolbar in
the latest release, and the torrent encryption is now compatible with Azureus
and uTorrent. Bitcomet doesn’t have a Remote Control feature and it doesn’t
support Super Seeding. The memory usage is on average 30.000k.
Bitcomet supports 7 out of 9 features.
XBT is a no-nonsense client. No great looks, but it does what it has to and is
very lightweight like uTorrent (10.000k memory). So if you don’t care about
looks, XBT might be something for you. XBT does not support BitTorrent
encryption, RSS, and DHT.
XBT supports 6 out of 9 features.
5th place: ABC
ABC (another BitTorrent client). Decent client, nice interface. ABC does not
support BitTorrent Encryption, RSS, DHT and it doesn’t have a tracker.
BitTorrent is based on Bittornado, and added a queuing system.
ABC supports 5 out of 9 features.
6th place: Bittornado
Bittornado has the same options as ABC but without the queuing system. It is
the successor of Shad0w’s Experimental Client, one of my all time favorites
(used it for almost a year). Bittornado was the first client to implement the
Super Seeding feature.
Bittornado supports 5 out of 9 features.
Horrible Mention: Artic Torrent
Developed to use low memory and cpu, and it does. But it doesn’t support any
of the nine features we listed. Artic supports 0 out of 9 features.
You can find out more about the features that are supported (or not) on
Wikipedia
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.6.5.51
推
12/01 23:08, , 1F
12/01 23:08, 1F
推
12/02 00:18, , 2F
12/02 00:18, 2F
→
12/02 00:33, , 3F
12/02 00:33, 3F
推
12/02 01:51, , 4F
12/02 01:51, 4F
推
12/02 04:35, , 5F
12/02 04:35, 5F
推
12/02 11:18, , 6F
12/02 11:18, 6F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：
心得
7
8