[情報] 官方藍帖‧關於Widowmaker改動
大意:原本奪命女的操作方式沒得到應有的代價,NERF。
原文:
http://us.battle.net/forums/en/overwatch/topic/20745186024?page=3#post-42
沒多久就3X頁了 正反兩派戰翻天
==============================================================================
Making the sure game feels responsive and smooth is very important to us.
Wherever we can, we make sure that the game responds to player input asap.
However, the one situation where we have to step in and possibly slow things
down is when an 'animation canceling' trick is discovered and allows players to
significantly increase a characters power.
There are two main problems with just leaving these things in the game as they
are.
我們非常重視英雄操作對玩家的回饋與流暢感,但是當有些"取消動畫"的技巧能讓英雄
威力顯著提升時,我們就會考慮調整英雄讓操作慢下來。
而如果不對這些問題做調整,可能會產生兩樣問題。
1. This trick becomes the new balance of the hero. Lets say there is a trick
that somehow allowed you to instantly complete McCree's roll instead of waiting
for it to complete normally. At that point, the character is much stronger, and
might suddenly be a balancing problem. The choices then becomes either fix that
bug, or allow it to exist and reduce his power elsewhere. If we decide to
reduce his power elsewhere, unless you know how to do this special (and often
unintuitive) trick, he will never feel correctly powerful for you.
2. Learning a hero now has to include learning how to abuse these bugs. This is
a huge turn off to a lot of players, and can turn a potential favorite hero
into a 'will never pick'.
1. 這些"技巧"會改變英雄現有的平衡。假設來說,如果McCree的翻滾能利用取消動畫的
技巧讓翻滾動作提早完成,顯然McCree會OP不少。這時如果我們選擇讓這個技巧繼續留
在腳色上,我們就只能從別的地方去平衡他。
這樣變成如果你不會用這些"不直覺"的操作,你就注定是個銅牌麥卡利。
2. 學習一個腳色的時候,這些小技巧因此變成不得不學習的東西。影響到一個玩家對這
些腳色的遊玩意願。
To speak to Widow's scope canceling trick specifically, when I first saw it it
seemed fine. The idea was that you are slowing down your fire rate slightly to
gain a little more situational awareness and a small movement bump between
shots, that is fine as a trade off. But the problem came about once I looked
into it a bit more and realized that the recovery time (the time between shots)
is 0.5 seconds, so as long as you scoped back in within 0.5 seconds of your
last shot, it didn't 'cost' you anything. That, in turn, means the *correct*
way to play her is to always scope out and back in within 0.5s of every shot,
otherwise you are playing a weaker Widowmaker.
再來談到Widowmaker這次開關鏡改動,一開始我注意到這件事的時候認為沒什麼問題。
就只是玩家犧牲了一點開火頻率,換取比較多的視野資訊和一些機動性。但是當我更深入
研究這個問題的時候,才發現WM的開火間隔是0.5秒,因此舊版的開關鏡技巧不會讓你損
失任何東西。
結果就是"正確"的操作WM的方式變成每槍的0.5秒間格中都開關鏡,不然你就是個比
較差的奪命女。
We talked about adding in some cost to force it to be more of a trade off, such
as delaying the recovery time when you scope out. That would mean when you
scoped back in you would have to wait the remaining 0.5s before you were
allowed to start charging or shoot again. Solutions like that often feel even
worse and are generally confusing, so we tend not to go those directions.
In general, we're not against player discovered tricks, in fact we love
watching players jump in and find this cool stuff! For example, Widowmaker
wasn't initially designed with the ability to be able to launch herself off a
ledge while grappling up, but that one was left in because it is pretty easy to
do (press space when you're approaching a ledge), works consistently, and
doesn't significantly change her power level.
我們有討論如何讓這個操作產生應有的代價,像是在關鏡後強制增加0.5秒的恢復時間
這時候不能重新開鏡集氣或是開槍,但是這類的調整通常效果不是很好,而且會讓玩家操
作時產生混亂,所以我們決定不往這個方向調整。
最後,我們不會阻止甚至非常喜歡玩家去挖掘這些小技巧。像是我們一開始根本沒有設
計讓玩家可以用WM的勾爪來做彈射,但是我們決定把這個操作留在WM上,因為很簡單、操
作起來很協調、而且不會顯著的影響英雄平衡。
==============================================================================
PS.滿多遊戲利用這些技巧來提升腳色的深度跟學習曲線。
不過OW的設計師顯然有不一樣的想法。
大家覺得這個改動如何呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.227.232.188
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/OverWatch/M.1466157417.A.95E.html
推
06/17 17:59, , 1F
06/17 17:59, 1F
→
06/17 17:59, , 2F
06/17 17:59, 2F
※ 編輯: IamAFake (36.227.232.188), 06/17/2016 18:00:31
推
06/17 18:00, , 3F
06/17 18:00, 3F
推
06/17 18:01, , 4F
06/17 18:01, 4F
→
06/17 18:03, , 5F
06/17 18:03, 5F
推
06/17 18:03, , 6F
06/17 18:03, 6F
推
06/17 18:04, , 7F
06/17 18:04, 7F
→
06/17 18:04, , 8F
06/17 18:04, 8F
推
06/17 18:05, , 9F
06/17 18:05, 9F
推
06/17 18:06, , 10F
06/17 18:06, 10F
推
06/17 18:06, , 11F
06/17 18:06, 11F
推
06/17 18:06, , 12F
06/17 18:06, 12F
→
06/17 18:06, , 13F
06/17 18:06, 13F
→
06/17 18:07, , 14F
06/17 18:07, 14F
→
06/17 18:07, , 15F
06/17 18:07, 15F
→
06/17 18:08, , 16F
06/17 18:08, 16F
→
06/17 18:08, , 17F
06/17 18:08, 17F
→
06/17 18:08, , 18F
06/17 18:08, 18F
→
06/17 18:10, , 19F
06/17 18:10, 19F
推
06/17 18:10, , 20F
06/17 18:10, 20F
→
06/17 18:11, , 21F
06/17 18:11, 21F
→
06/17 18:11, , 22F
06/17 18:11, 22F
→
06/17 18:12, , 23F
06/17 18:12, 23F
推
06/17 18:12, , 24F
06/17 18:12, 24F
推
06/17 18:12, , 25F
06/17 18:12, 25F
推
06/17 18:12, , 26F
06/17 18:12, 26F
→
06/17 18:13, , 27F
06/17 18:13, 27F
→
06/17 18:13, , 28F
06/17 18:13, 28F
→
06/17 18:14, , 29F
06/17 18:14, 29F
→
06/17 18:15, , 30F
06/17 18:15, 30F
噓
06/17 18:15, , 31F
06/17 18:15, 31F
噓
06/17 18:15, , 32F
06/17 18:15, 32F
推
06/17 18:16, , 33F
06/17 18:16, 33F
推
06/17 18:17, , 34F
06/17 18:17, 34F
推
06/17 18:17, , 35F
06/17 18:17, 35F
→
06/17 18:18, , 36F
06/17 18:18, 36F
推
06/17 18:19, , 37F
06/17 18:19, 37F
推
06/17 18:22, , 38F
06/17 18:22, 38F
推
06/17 18:22, , 39F
06/17 18:22, 39F
→
06/17 18:23, , 40F
06/17 18:23, 40F
推
06/17 18:23, , 41F
06/17 18:23, 41F
→
06/17 18:24, , 42F
06/17 18:24, 42F
推
06/17 18:25, , 43F
06/17 18:25, 43F
噓
06/17 18:25, , 44F
06/17 18:25, 44F
→
06/17 18:26, , 45F
06/17 18:26, 45F
推
06/17 18:28, , 46F
06/17 18:28, 46F
推
06/17 18:28, , 47F
06/17 18:28, 47F
→
06/17 18:29, , 48F
06/17 18:29, 48F
→
06/17 18:29, , 49F
06/17 18:29, 49F
→
06/17 18:32, , 50F
06/17 18:32, 50F
→
06/17 18:32, , 51F
06/17 18:32, 51F
推
06/17 18:37, , 52F
06/17 18:37, 52F
推
06/17 18:45, , 53F
06/17 18:45, 53F
推
06/17 18:58, , 54F
06/17 18:58, 54F
→
06/17 18:58, , 55F
06/17 18:58, 55F
推
06/17 18:59, , 56F
06/17 18:59, 56F
→
06/17 19:00, , 57F
06/17 19:00, 57F
推
06/17 19:17, , 58F
06/17 19:17, 58F
→
06/17 19:34, , 59F
06/17 19:34, 59F
→
06/17 19:34, , 60F
06/17 19:34, 60F
推
06/17 19:36, , 61F
06/17 19:36, 61F
推
06/17 19:38, , 62F
06/17 19:38, 62F
推
06/17 19:39, , 63F
06/17 19:39, 63F
推
06/17 19:49, , 64F
06/17 19:49, 64F
推
06/17 19:50, , 65F
06/17 19:50, 65F
推
06/17 19:55, , 66F
06/17 19:55, 66F
→
06/17 20:01, , 67F
06/17 20:01, 67F
→
06/17 20:02, , 68F
06/17 20:02, 68F
推
06/17 20:06, , 69F
06/17 20:06, 69F
推
06/17 20:07, , 70F
06/17 20:07, 70F
→
06/17 20:07, , 71F
06/17 20:07, 71F
推
06/17 20:10, , 72F
06/17 20:10, 72F
→
06/17 20:18, , 73F
06/17 20:18, 73F
→
06/17 20:18, , 74F
06/17 20:18, 74F
推
06/17 20:52, , 75F
06/17 20:52, 75F
推
06/17 21:35, , 76F
06/17 21:35, 76F
推
06/17 21:45, , 77F
06/17 21:45, 77F
推
06/17 21:53, , 78F
06/17 21:53, 78F
推
06/17 22:13, , 79F
06/17 22:13, 79F
推
06/17 23:12, , 80F
06/17 23:12, 80F
→
06/17 23:59, , 81F
06/17 23:59, 81F
→
06/18 00:01, , 82F
06/18 00:01, 82F
推
06/18 00:15, , 83F
06/18 00:15, 83F
→
06/18 00:16, , 84F
06/18 00:16, 84F
→
06/18 00:18, , 85F
06/18 00:18, 85F
→
06/18 00:20, , 86F
06/18 00:20, 86F
→
06/18 00:21, , 87F
06/18 00:21, 87F
推
06/18 00:54, , 88F
06/18 00:54, 88F
→
06/18 00:55, , 89F
06/18 00:55, 89F
→
06/18 00:56, , 90F
06/18 00:56, 90F
→
06/18 01:54, , 91F
06/18 01:54, 91F
→
06/18 02:21, , 92F
06/18 02:21, 92F
推
06/18 14:03, , 93F
06/18 14:03, 93F
推
06/18 15:16, , 94F
06/18 15:16, 94F
→
06/18 15:16, , 95F
06/18 15:16, 95F
推
06/19 09:57, , 96F
06/19 09:57, 96F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):