[心得] Yonex的做法在體育商競不是很正常的嗎?
今天Yonex花錢贊助羽協 本來就是會要求選手使用Yonex產品
不然Yonex怎會傻傻掏錢給你? 佛心來著?
運動選手最重要的經濟來源之一來自商業廣告代言
特別是像羽球 桌球 排球這種市場比較小眾的運動
商業代言的費用可能還比他們自己當運動員本業賺的更多
如果選手代言和運動產品公司之間的合作能夠魚幫水水幫魚
這也是讓台灣體育環境能夠變好進步的方法之一
因為運動選手如果能經常性的名利雙收
很自然會去吸引年輕人競相去體育競賽的領域來發展
我覺得Y牌和戴資穎的事情 其實嚴格講誰都沒有錯
只是戴姿穎太晚對這事情做處理
才惹出後來的爭議出來
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.168.6
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Olympics_ISG/M.1471516951.A.3C1.html
推
08/18 18:44, , 1F
08/18 18:44, 1F
→
08/18 18:44, , 2F
08/18 18:44, 2F
※ 編輯: peter308 (36.231.168.6), 08/18/2016 18:46:23
推
08/18 18:45, , 3F
08/18 18:45, 3F
→
08/18 18:46, , 4F
08/18 18:46, 4F
→
08/18 18:46, , 5F
08/18 18:46, 5F
※ 編輯: peter308 (36.231.168.6), 08/18/2016 18:48:18
→
08/18 18:47, , 6F
08/18 18:47, 6F
推
08/18 18:47, , 7F
08/18 18:47, 7F
推
08/18 18:47, , 8F
08/18 18:47, 8F
→
08/18 18:47, , 9F
08/18 18:47, 9F
→
08/18 18:48, , 10F
08/18 18:48, 10F
→
08/18 18:48, , 11F
08/18 18:48, 11F
→
08/18 18:48, , 12F
08/18 18:48, 12F
推
08/18 18:48, , 13F
08/18 18:48, 13F
→
08/18 18:49, , 14F
08/18 18:49, 14F
→
08/18 18:49, , 15F
08/18 18:49, 15F
美國是運動公司和選手直接洽談 不是透過第三方 ex:聯盟
可能美國運動產業比較進步所以有點不太一樣
※ 編輯: peter308 (36.231.168.6), 08/18/2016 18:51:34
推
08/18 18:50, , 16F
08/18 18:50, 16F
推
08/18 18:50, , 17F
08/18 18:50, 17F
→
08/18 18:50, , 18F
08/18 18:50, 18F
→
08/18 18:50, , 19F
08/18 18:50, 19F
推
08/18 18:51, , 20F
08/18 18:51, 20F
→
08/18 18:51, , 21F
08/18 18:51, 21F
推
08/18 18:52, , 22F
08/18 18:52, 22F
→
08/18 18:52, , 23F
08/18 18:52, 23F
→
08/18 18:52, , 24F
08/18 18:52, 24F
推
08/18 18:52, , 25F
08/18 18:52, 25F
→
08/18 18:53, , 26F
08/18 18:53, 26F
→
08/18 18:53, , 27F
08/18 18:53, 27F
→
08/18 18:53, , 28F
08/18 18:53, 28F
→
08/18 18:54, , 29F
08/18 18:54, 29F
→
08/18 18:54, , 30F
08/18 18:54, 30F
→
08/18 18:54, , 31F
08/18 18:54, 31F
→
08/18 18:54, , 32F
08/18 18:54, 32F
→
08/18 18:54, , 33F
08/18 18:54, 33F
推
08/18 18:54, , 34F
08/18 18:54, 34F
→
08/18 18:54, , 35F
08/18 18:54, 35F
→
08/18 18:55, , 36F
08/18 18:55, 36F
還有 52 則推文
→
08/18 20:59, , 89F
08/18 20:59, 89F
→
08/18 21:15, , 90F
08/18 21:15, 90F
→
08/18 21:31, , 91F
08/18 21:31, 91F
噓
08/18 21:34, , 92F
08/18 21:34, 92F
推
08/18 21:37, , 93F
08/18 21:37, 93F
→
08/18 21:37, , 94F
08/18 21:37, 94F
→
08/18 21:37, , 95F
08/18 21:37, 95F
→
08/18 21:37, , 96F
08/18 21:37, 96F
→
08/18 21:39, , 97F
08/18 21:39, 97F
→
08/18 21:39, , 98F
08/18 21:39, 98F
→
08/18 21:47, , 99F
08/18 21:47, 99F
推
08/18 21:58, , 100F
08/18 21:58, 100F
→
08/18 21:58, , 101F
08/18 21:58, 101F
→
08/18 21:59, , 102F
08/18 21:59, 102F
→
08/18 21:59, , 103F
08/18 21:59, 103F
→
08/18 22:00, , 104F
08/18 22:00, 104F
推
08/18 22:02, , 105F
08/18 22:02, 105F
噓
08/18 22:05, , 106F
08/18 22:05, 106F
推
08/18 22:25, , 107F
08/18 22:25, 107F
→
08/18 22:26, , 108F
08/18 22:26, 108F
推
08/18 22:43, , 109F
08/18 22:43, 109F
→
08/18 22:43, , 110F
08/18 22:43, 110F
推
08/18 22:48, , 111F
08/18 22:48, 111F
→
08/18 23:22, , 112F
08/18 23:22, 112F
→
08/18 23:23, , 113F
08/18 23:23, 113F
→
08/18 23:24, , 114F
08/18 23:24, 114F
推
08/18 23:38, , 115F
08/18 23:38, 115F
→
08/18 23:39, , 116F
08/18 23:39, 116F
推
08/18 23:43, , 117F
08/18 23:43, 117F
→
08/19 00:07, , 118F
08/19 00:07, 118F
噓
08/19 00:08, , 119F
08/19 00:08, 119F
推
08/19 00:45, , 120F
08/19 00:45, 120F
→
08/19 00:47, , 121F
08/19 00:47, 121F
→
08/19 00:47, , 122F
08/19 00:47, 122F
推
08/19 01:05, , 123F
08/19 01:05, 123F
噓
08/19 10:15, , 124F
08/19 10:15, 124F
→
08/19 10:26, , 125F
08/19 10:26, 125F
→
08/19 13:59, , 126F
08/19 13:59, 126F
→
08/19 14:01, , 127F
08/19 14:01, 127F
推
08/22 17:50, , 128F
08/22 17:50, 128F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):