[劇透] 841雷 三治的戰力?
看完了841話,三治輸給一治二治四治是合理的,不論一治是否先威脅了三治不準反抗
第一、小時候回憶錄 三治明顯各方面落後其他人,在先天的設定上,一二四治是優於三
治的。
第二、三治從小接受的主要是作菜,並非專業格鬥訓練,而一二四治從小生活的目標就是
被訓練成戰鬥機器,被老爸當作超人一樣訓練,加上科技、基因改造與生活背景的 差異
造成現在實力的差距並不意外。
第三、香吉士本身的夢想就不是成為戰鬥超強的人,他的夢想是找到All Blue,成為偉大
的廚師,而一二四治從小沒有夢想,只能戰鬥,戰鬥就是他們生活的一切,香吉士 輸給
一二四治,也合情合理。
第四、香吉士戰力低落的情況有跡可尋,與維爾戈戰鬥的情況陷入苦戰,維爾戈卻被羅輕
取。後續與明哥的戰鬥也幾乎完敗,可以證實香吉士的戰鬥力的確不是第一線的。
第五、大媽夢寐以求想獲得傑爾瑪能力,表示傑爾瑪有一定的實力,而身為傑爾瑪最高戰
力的一、二、四治若被香吉士擊敗,會造成觀眾對傑爾瑪也不過爾爾的觀感,造成後續觀
看 的刺激感不足。
以上的原因讓我覺得三治不論在各種情況下,輸給一治、二治都是正常的。
不知道各位覺得這樣的推斷是否合理?歡迎討論。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.13.115.29
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ONE_PIECE/M.1475244171.A.BDF.html
推
09/30 22:08, , 1F
09/30 22:08, 1F
推
09/30 22:12, , 2F
09/30 22:12, 2F
推
09/30 22:28, , 3F
09/30 22:28, 3F
推
09/30 22:32, , 4F
09/30 22:32, 4F
→
09/30 22:32, , 5F
09/30 22:32, 5F
→
09/30 22:33, , 6F
09/30 22:33, 6F
→
09/30 22:35, , 7F
09/30 22:35, 7F
推
09/30 22:36, , 8F
09/30 22:36, 8F
→
09/30 22:36, , 9F
09/30 22:36, 9F
→
09/30 22:37, , 10F
09/30 22:37, 10F
推
09/30 22:41, , 11F
09/30 22:41, 11F
噓
09/30 22:41, , 12F
09/30 22:41, 12F
→
09/30 22:45, , 13F
09/30 22:45, 13F
→
09/30 22:46, , 14F
09/30 22:46, 14F
推
09/30 22:46, , 15F
09/30 22:46, 15F
→
09/30 22:47, , 16F
09/30 22:47, 16F
→
09/30 22:49, , 17F
09/30 22:49, 17F
推
09/30 22:51, , 18F
09/30 22:51, 18F
→
09/30 22:51, , 19F
09/30 22:51, 19F
→
09/30 22:53, , 20F
09/30 22:53, 20F
→
09/30 22:53, , 21F
09/30 22:53, 21F
噓
09/30 22:54, , 22F
09/30 22:54, 22F
→
09/30 22:54, , 23F
09/30 22:54, 23F
→
09/30 22:54, , 24F
09/30 22:54, 24F
→
09/30 22:54, , 25F
09/30 22:54, 25F
→
09/30 22:56, , 26F
09/30 22:56, 26F
→
09/30 22:57, , 27F
09/30 22:57, 27F
→
09/30 22:58, , 28F
09/30 22:58, 28F
噓
09/30 23:05, , 29F
09/30 23:05, 29F
→
09/30 23:06, , 30F
09/30 23:06, 30F
→
09/30 23:15, , 31F
09/30 23:15, 31F
→
09/30 23:16, , 32F
09/30 23:16, 32F
推
09/30 23:21, , 33F
09/30 23:21, 33F
→
09/30 23:21, , 34F
09/30 23:21, 34F
→
09/30 23:21, , 35F
09/30 23:21, 35F
→
09/30 23:21, , 36F
09/30 23:21, 36F
→
09/30 23:22, , 37F
09/30 23:22, 37F
推
09/30 23:26, , 38F
09/30 23:26, 38F
→
09/30 23:51, , 39F
09/30 23:51, 39F
→
09/30 23:51, , 40F
09/30 23:51, 40F
推
10/01 00:00, , 41F
10/01 00:00, 41F
→
10/01 00:03, , 42F
10/01 00:03, 42F
噓
10/01 00:03, , 43F
10/01 00:03, 43F
→
10/01 00:08, , 44F
10/01 00:08, 44F
→
10/01 00:08, , 45F
10/01 00:08, 45F
推
10/01 00:24, , 46F
10/01 00:24, 46F
推
10/01 00:40, , 47F
10/01 00:40, 47F
→
10/01 00:40, , 48F
10/01 00:40, 48F
→
10/01 00:40, , 49F
10/01 00:40, 49F
噓
10/01 01:31, , 50F
10/01 01:31, 50F
噓
10/01 09:31, , 51F
10/01 09:31, 51F
噓
10/01 09:32, , 52F
10/01 09:32, 52F
推
10/01 09:37, , 53F
10/01 09:37, 53F
推
10/01 10:51, , 54F
10/01 10:51, 54F
→
10/01 10:51, , 55F
10/01 10:51, 55F
噓
10/01 12:11, , 56F
10/01 12:11, 56F
→
10/01 12:11, , 57F
10/01 12:11, 57F
→
10/01 12:11, , 58F
10/01 12:11, 58F
→
10/01 12:20, , 59F
10/01 12:20, 59F
→
10/01 12:20, , 60F
10/01 12:20, 60F
噓
10/01 13:01, , 61F
10/01 13:01, 61F
→
10/01 13:01, , 62F
10/01 13:01, 62F
→
10/01 13:01, , 63F
10/01 13:01, 63F
→
10/01 13:01, , 64F
10/01 13:01, 64F
噓
10/01 13:06, , 65F
10/01 13:06, 65F
→
10/01 13:58, , 66F
10/01 13:58, 66F
→
10/01 13:59, , 67F
10/01 13:59, 67F
→
10/01 14:00, , 68F
10/01 14:00, 68F
→
10/01 14:38, , 69F
10/01 14:38, 69F
→
10/01 14:39, , 70F
10/01 14:39, 70F
※ 編輯: frojet (101.13.115.29), 10/01/2016 16:25:51
噓
10/01 20:49, , 71F
10/01 20:49, 71F
推
10/01 21:22, , 72F
10/01 21:22, 72F
噓
10/01 21:53, , 73F
10/01 21:53, 73F
推
10/01 23:35, , 74F
10/01 23:35, 74F
→
10/01 23:38, , 75F
10/01 23:38, 75F
→
10/01 23:39, , 76F
10/01 23:39, 76F
噓
10/01 23:58, , 77F
10/01 23:58, 77F
→
10/02 01:03, , 78F
10/02 01:03, 78F
噓
10/02 02:17, , 79F
10/02 02:17, 79F
推
10/02 19:22, , 80F
10/02 19:22, 80F
→
10/02 19:22, , 81F
10/02 19:22, 81F
→
10/02 19:22, , 82F
10/02 19:22, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
劇透
4
82