Re: [討論] 今年的合約跟交易
※ 引述《shancko (雅典等等我)》之銘言:
: "如果只花錢一定沒問題,但是要丟出農作物就不值得,所以等Santana變FA再來簽吧"
The question is whether you can get things done by money ONLY
Even if CC enters FA market after this season, how many chances that
Yankees can land him by playing money? I am sure a familiar face will be
around at that time, Yes, Redsox. They have money to spend too after
Schilling retires. And dont rule out Brewers, they can pay sombody like
Suppan 10 million, I dont see why they can not pay CC 17-20 million. They
have a great farm to keep a low ML payroll. They definitely can spend
money in some key spots.
Nowadays, the value of an ACE is much more than 2 draft picks. No team will
allow their ACEs simply walk away. They will either sign them long term
before they become FA, or trade them away. And the teams obtain those ACEs
will sign them long term before the season is over. Just like the Santana
case. The situation will become that you can not find a real gem in FA
market. Who is the top pitcher in last years FA? Calos Silva. This will be
the trend.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 209.173.238.18
推
07/05 14:46, , 1F
07/05 14:46, 1F
推
07/05 15:05, , 2F
07/05 15:05, 2F
推
07/05 15:05, , 3F
07/05 15:05, 3F
推
07/05 15:06, , 4F
07/05 15:06, 4F
→
07/05 15:07, , 5F
07/05 15:07, 5F
推
07/05 15:11, , 6F
07/05 15:11, 6F
※ 編輯: kafen 來自: 209.173.238.18 (07/05 15:12)
推
07/05 15:14, , 7F
07/05 15:14, 7F
→
07/05 15:25, , 8F
07/05 15:25, 8F
→
07/05 15:26, , 9F
07/05 15:26, 9F
→
07/05 15:27, , 10F
07/05 15:27, 10F
推
07/05 15:34, , 11F
07/05 15:34, 11F
→
07/05 15:40, , 12F
07/05 15:40, 12F
→
07/05 15:40, , 13F
07/05 15:40, 13F
→
07/05 15:42, , 14F
07/05 15:42, 14F
→
07/05 15:42, , 15F
07/05 15:42, 15F
推
07/05 15:42, , 16F
07/05 15:42, 16F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
討論
21
35
完整討論串 (本文為第 9 之 31 篇):
討論
6
9
討論
36
74
討論
8
15
討論
2
13
討論
23
51
討論
12
12
討論
21
35
討論
8
16