[討論] 相較得分王,DPOY被低估了?消失
如果說得分王,是進攻能力一大指標
那最佳防守球員(DPOY),應該就是對防守能力的最高肯定
然而得分王,當季通常也是第一隊或第二隊
但DPOY,比如這季的得主Gobert,則沒進年度前三隊
又比如Marcus Camby,06-07賽季奪下火鍋王跟最佳防守球員,但也沒進前三隊
再來看名人堂歷史,拿過1次得分王,大致就保底名人堂
DPOY呢?拿過2次還未必穩
比如較早期的Moncrief,2次DPOY,5次全明星,5次年度隊,生涯場均也有15分,結果沒進
這樣看來,最佳防守球員這獎似乎被低估了?
大家怎麼看呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.70.230.159
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1533790907.A.741.html
推
08/09 13:03, , 1F
08/09 13:03, 1F
→
08/09 13:03, , 2F
08/09 13:03, 2F
→
08/09 13:04, , 3F
08/09 13:04, 3F
推
08/09 13:05, , 4F
08/09 13:05, 4F
→
08/09 13:05, , 5F
08/09 13:05, 5F
推
08/09 13:07, , 6F
08/09 13:07, 6F
→
08/09 13:07, , 7F
08/09 13:07, 7F
→
08/09 13:07, , 8F
08/09 13:07, 8F
→
08/09 13:08, , 9F
08/09 13:08, 9F
推
08/09 13:08, , 10F
08/09 13:08, 10F
→
08/09 13:09, , 11F
08/09 13:09, 11F
→
08/09 13:09, , 12F
08/09 13:09, 12F
→
08/09 13:10, , 13F
08/09 13:10, 13F
→
08/09 13:10, , 14F
08/09 13:10, 14F
推
08/09 13:10, , 15F
08/09 13:10, 15F
→
08/09 13:12, , 16F
08/09 13:12, 16F
→
08/09 13:12, , 17F
08/09 13:12, 17F
→
08/09 13:13, , 18F
08/09 13:13, 18F
→
08/09 13:13, , 19F
08/09 13:13, 19F
推
08/09 13:13, , 20F
08/09 13:13, 20F
→
08/09 13:13, , 21F
08/09 13:13, 21F
→
08/09 13:14, , 22F
08/09 13:14, 22F
→
08/09 13:15, , 23F
08/09 13:15, 23F
推
08/09 13:17, , 24F
08/09 13:17, 24F
推
08/09 13:18, , 25F
08/09 13:18, 25F
→
08/09 13:18, , 26F
08/09 13:18, 26F
推
08/09 13:18, , 27F
08/09 13:18, 27F
→
08/09 13:19, , 28F
08/09 13:19, 28F
→
08/09 13:20, , 29F
08/09 13:20, 29F
→
08/09 13:20, , 30F
08/09 13:20, 30F
推
08/09 13:20, , 31F
08/09 13:20, 31F
→
08/09 13:20, , 32F
08/09 13:20, 32F
→
08/09 13:20, , 33F
08/09 13:20, 33F
→
08/09 13:20, , 34F
08/09 13:20, 34F
→
08/09 13:21, , 35F
08/09 13:21, 35F
→
08/09 13:21, , 36F
08/09 13:21, 36F
推
08/09 13:22, , 37F
08/09 13:22, 37F
推
08/09 13:22, , 38F
08/09 13:22, 38F
推
08/09 13:24, , 39F
08/09 13:24, 39F
還有 42 則推文
推
08/09 16:26, , 82F
08/09 16:26, 82F
→
08/09 16:26, , 83F
08/09 16:26, 83F
→
08/09 16:32, , 84F
08/09 16:32, 84F
→
08/09 16:33, , 85F
08/09 16:33, 85F
→
08/09 16:46, , 86F
08/09 16:46, 86F
推
08/09 17:16, , 87F
08/09 17:16, 87F
→
08/09 17:16, , 88F
08/09 17:16, 88F
→
08/09 17:16, , 89F
08/09 17:16, 89F
推
08/09 17:25, , 90F
08/09 17:25, 90F
→
08/09 17:27, , 91F
08/09 17:27, 91F
推
08/09 17:38, , 92F
08/09 17:38, 92F
噓
08/09 17:59, , 93F
08/09 17:59, 93F
推
08/09 17:59, , 94F
08/09 17:59, 94F
推
08/09 18:08, , 95F
08/09 18:08, 95F
推
08/09 19:33, , 96F
08/09 19:33, 96F
推
08/09 19:36, , 97F
08/09 19:36, 97F
→
08/09 19:36, , 98F
08/09 19:36, 98F
→
08/09 19:39, , 99F
08/09 19:39, 99F
→
08/09 19:39, , 100F
08/09 19:39, 100F
→
08/09 20:40, , 101F
08/09 20:40, 101F
推
08/09 20:51, , 102F
08/09 20:51, 102F
推
08/09 21:03, , 103F
08/09 21:03, 103F
推
08/09 21:43, , 104F
08/09 21:43, 104F
→
08/09 22:12, , 105F
08/09 22:12, 105F
→
08/09 22:12, , 106F
08/09 22:12, 106F
推
08/09 22:34, , 107F
08/09 22:34, 107F
→
08/09 22:56, , 108F
08/09 22:56, 108F
噓
08/10 00:03, , 109F
08/10 00:03, 109F
→
08/10 00:03, , 110F
08/10 00:03, 110F
→
08/10 01:14, , 111F
08/10 01:14, 111F
推
08/10 10:49, , 112F
08/10 10:49, 112F
→
08/10 10:49, , 113F
08/10 10:49, 113F
→
08/10 10:49, , 114F
08/10 10:49, 114F
→
08/10 10:50, , 115F
08/10 10:50, 115F
→
08/10 10:50, , 116F
08/10 10:50, 116F
→
08/10 10:51, , 117F
08/10 10:51, 117F
→
08/10 10:52, , 118F
08/10 10:52, 118F
→
08/10 10:53, , 119F
08/10 10:53, 119F
→
08/10 10:54, , 120F
08/10 10:54, 120F
→
08/10 10:54, , 121F
08/10 10:54, 121F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
40
121