Re: [討論] 騎士二王打勇士四巨頭是不是本來就吃虧?
今天騎士上場 8人
勇士上場13人
板凳深度與使用法就差一大截
KD =< LBJ
KT =< KI
Curry >> JR
Green =< Love
就算評價如此,也抵不掉curry那個差異
而且說勇士四巨頭,大家都把小AI忘掉了
在76人時期的Iguodala,一點都不遜於狼王時期的Love
33歲打充分休息的第六人還綽綽有餘
加上5號位子強度的差異
2017整體球隊強度還是 勇士 >> 騎士
※ 引述《Raskolnikov (拉斯柯爾尼科夫)》之銘言:
: 看了看數據
: 騎士就靠厄文和Lebron 兩人火力在硬撐
: 勇士則是多點開花
: 雖然Green情緒明顯受影響 始終不在狀況內
: 但其他三巨頭還是打出極具統治力的表現
: 力壓騎士二王
: 勇士靠著在暑假組成的四巨頭
: 硬是力挽狂瀾拿下G3
: 簡直統治了整個東西區季後賽
:
: 這樣看來
: 休賽季沒明顯補強 主力依然跟上季相同的騎士
: 只能靠二王力抗四巨頭
: 頂多JR和Love會偶爾貢獻一下
: 這個差距是不是先天上就輸了?
: 在戰力上明顯吃虧啊
: 騎士在今年休賽季該不該引進PG??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.100.73.128
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1496899894.A.D54.html
噓
06/08 13:32, , 1F
06/08 13:32, 1F
→
06/08 13:33, , 2F
06/08 13:33, 2F
噓
06/08 13:34, , 3F
06/08 13:34, 3F
→
06/08 13:35, , 4F
06/08 13:35, 4F
噓
06/08 13:35, , 5F
06/08 13:35, 5F
→
06/08 13:35, , 6F
06/08 13:35, 6F
→
06/08 13:35, , 7F
06/08 13:35, 7F
→
06/08 13:36, , 8F
06/08 13:36, 8F
推
06/08 13:36, , 9F
06/08 13:36, 9F
→
06/08 13:36, , 10F
06/08 13:36, 10F
推
06/08 13:37, , 11F
06/08 13:37, 11F
→
06/08 13:37, , 12F
06/08 13:37, 12F
推
06/08 13:38, , 13F
06/08 13:38, 13F
→
06/08 13:38, , 14F
06/08 13:38, 14F
噓
06/08 13:39, , 15F
06/08 13:39, 15F
→
06/08 13:40, , 16F
06/08 13:40, 16F
→
06/08 13:41, , 17F
06/08 13:41, 17F
→
06/08 13:42, , 18F
06/08 13:42, 18F
→
06/08 13:42, , 19F
06/08 13:42, 19F
→
06/08 13:42, , 20F
06/08 13:42, 20F
噓
06/08 13:43, , 21F
06/08 13:43, 21F
→
06/08 13:43, , 22F
06/08 13:43, 22F
→
06/08 13:44, , 23F
06/08 13:44, 23F
→
06/08 13:44, , 24F
06/08 13:44, 24F
→
06/08 13:44, , 25F
06/08 13:44, 25F
→
06/08 13:45, , 26F
06/08 13:45, 26F
→
06/08 13:45, , 27F
06/08 13:45, 27F
→
06/08 13:45, , 28F
06/08 13:45, 28F
→
06/08 13:46, , 29F
06/08 13:46, 29F
→
06/08 13:46, , 30F
06/08 13:46, 30F
→
06/08 13:46, , 31F
06/08 13:46, 31F
→
06/08 13:46, , 32F
06/08 13:46, 32F
→
06/08 13:46, , 33F
06/08 13:46, 33F
→
06/08 13:47, , 34F
06/08 13:47, 34F
→
06/08 13:47, , 35F
06/08 13:47, 35F
→
06/08 13:48, , 36F
06/08 13:48, 36F
→
06/08 13:48, , 37F
06/08 13:48, 37F
→
06/08 13:48, , 38F
06/08 13:48, 38F
→
06/08 13:48, , 39F
06/08 13:48, 39F
→
06/08 13:49, , 40F
06/08 13:49, 40F
→
06/08 13:49, , 41F
06/08 13:49, 41F
→
06/08 13:50, , 42F
06/08 13:50, 42F
→
06/08 13:50, , 43F
06/08 13:50, 43F
→
06/08 13:51, , 44F
06/08 13:51, 44F
→
06/08 13:51, , 45F
06/08 13:51, 45F
→
06/08 13:51, , 46F
06/08 13:51, 46F
→
06/08 13:51, , 47F
06/08 13:51, 47F
→
06/08 13:52, , 48F
06/08 13:52, 48F
→
06/08 13:52, , 49F
06/08 13:52, 49F
→
06/08 13:53, , 50F
06/08 13:53, 50F
→
06/08 13:53, , 51F
06/08 13:53, 51F
→
06/08 13:53, , 52F
06/08 13:53, 52F
→
06/08 13:54, , 53F
06/08 13:54, 53F
→
06/08 13:54, , 54F
06/08 13:54, 54F
推
06/08 13:55, , 55F
06/08 13:55, 55F
→
06/08 13:55, , 56F
06/08 13:55, 56F
→
06/08 13:56, , 57F
06/08 13:56, 57F
→
06/08 13:56, , 58F
06/08 13:56, 58F
→
06/08 13:56, , 59F
06/08 13:56, 59F
推
06/08 13:57, , 60F
06/08 13:57, 60F
→
06/08 13:57, , 61F
06/08 13:57, 61F
→
06/08 13:57, , 62F
06/08 13:57, 62F
→
06/08 13:57, , 63F
06/08 13:57, 63F
→
06/08 13:57, , 64F
06/08 13:57, 64F
→
06/08 13:58, , 65F
06/08 13:58, 65F
→
06/08 13:59, , 66F
06/08 13:59, 66F
→
06/08 13:59, , 67F
06/08 13:59, 67F
推
06/08 13:59, , 68F
06/08 13:59, 68F
→
06/08 14:00, , 69F
06/08 14:00, 69F
→
06/08 14:00, , 70F
06/08 14:00, 70F
→
06/08 14:00, , 71F
06/08 14:00, 71F
→
06/08 14:00, , 72F
06/08 14:00, 72F
→
06/08 14:01, , 73F
06/08 14:01, 73F
→
06/08 14:01, , 74F
06/08 14:01, 74F
→
06/08 14:02, , 75F
06/08 14:02, 75F
→
06/08 14:03, , 76F
06/08 14:03, 76F
→
06/08 14:03, , 77F
06/08 14:03, 77F
→
06/08 14:03, , 78F
06/08 14:03, 78F
→
06/08 14:03, , 79F
06/08 14:03, 79F
→
06/08 14:05, , 80F
06/08 14:05, 80F
→
06/08 14:05, , 81F
06/08 14:05, 81F
噓
06/08 14:10, , 82F
06/08 14:10, 82F
推
06/08 14:19, , 83F
06/08 14:19, 83F
→
06/08 14:22, , 84F
06/08 14:22, 84F
→
06/08 14:23, , 85F
06/08 14:23, 85F
→
06/08 14:24, , 86F
06/08 14:24, 86F
→
06/08 14:27, , 87F
06/08 14:27, 87F
→
06/08 14:42, , 88F
06/08 14:42, 88F
噓
06/08 15:11, , 89F
06/08 15:11, 89F
推
06/08 20:54, , 90F
06/08 20:54, 90F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):