[討論] 騎士二王打勇士四巨頭是不是本來就吃虧?
看了看數據
騎士就靠厄文和Lebron 兩人火力在硬撐
勇士則是多點開花
雖然Green情緒明顯受影響 始終不在狀況內
但其他三巨頭還是打出極具統治力的表現
力壓騎士二王
勇士靠著在暑假組成的四巨頭
硬是力挽狂瀾拿下G3
簡直統治了整個東西區季後賽
這樣看來
休賽季沒明顯補強 主力依然跟上季相同的騎士
只能靠二王力抗四巨頭
頂多JR和Love會偶爾貢獻一下
這個差距是不是先天上就輸了?
在戰力上明顯吃虧啊
騎士在今年休賽季該不該引進PG??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.223.123.195
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1496898187.A.BEF.html
※ 編輯: Raskolnikov (61.223.123.195), 06/08/2017 13:03:39
→
06/08 13:03, , 1F
06/08 13:03, 1F
推
06/08 13:03, , 2F
06/08 13:03, 2F
推
06/08 13:04, , 3F
06/08 13:04, 3F
推
06/08 13:04, , 4F
06/08 13:04, 4F
→
06/08 13:04, , 5F
06/08 13:04, 5F
→
06/08 13:04, , 6F
06/08 13:04, 6F
→
06/08 13:04, , 7F
06/08 13:04, 7F
推
06/08 13:04, , 8F
06/08 13:04, 8F
推
06/08 13:04, , 9F
06/08 13:04, 9F
→
06/08 13:04, , 10F
06/08 13:04, 10F
→
06/08 13:04, , 11F
06/08 13:04, 11F
→
06/08 13:04, , 12F
06/08 13:04, 12F
推
06/08 13:04, , 13F
06/08 13:04, 13F
推
06/08 13:04, , 14F
06/08 13:04, 14F
推
06/08 13:05, , 15F
06/08 13:05, 15F
推
06/08 13:05, , 16F
06/08 13:05, 16F
推
06/08 13:05, , 17F
06/08 13:05, 17F
→
06/08 13:05, , 18F
06/08 13:05, 18F
推
06/08 13:05, , 19F
06/08 13:05, 19F
→
06/08 13:05, , 20F
06/08 13:05, 20F
推
06/08 13:05, , 21F
06/08 13:05, 21F
噓
06/08 13:05, , 22F
06/08 13:05, 22F
推
06/08 13:06, , 23F
06/08 13:06, 23F
推
06/08 13:06, , 24F
06/08 13:06, 24F
推
06/08 13:06, , 25F
06/08 13:06, 25F
推
06/08 13:06, , 26F
06/08 13:06, 26F
推
06/08 13:06, , 27F
06/08 13:06, 27F
推
06/08 13:06, , 28F
06/08 13:06, 28F
推
06/08 13:06, , 29F
06/08 13:06, 29F
噓
06/08 13:06, , 30F
06/08 13:06, 30F
推
06/08 13:06, , 31F
06/08 13:06, 31F
→
06/08 13:06, , 32F
06/08 13:06, 32F
推
06/08 13:06, , 33F
06/08 13:06, 33F
→
06/08 13:06, , 34F
06/08 13:06, 34F
→
06/08 13:07, , 35F
06/08 13:07, 35F
→
06/08 13:07, , 36F
06/08 13:07, 36F
推
06/08 13:07, , 37F
06/08 13:07, 37F
噓
06/08 13:07, , 38F
06/08 13:07, 38F
噓
06/08 13:07, , 39F
06/08 13:07, 39F
還有 197 則推文
→
06/08 13:40, , 237F
06/08 13:40, 237F
→
06/08 13:40, , 238F
06/08 13:40, 238F
→
06/08 13:41, , 239F
06/08 13:41, 239F
→
06/08 13:41, , 240F
06/08 13:41, 240F
→
06/08 13:41, , 241F
06/08 13:41, 241F
→
06/08 13:42, , 242F
06/08 13:42, 242F
→
06/08 13:42, , 243F
06/08 13:42, 243F
推
06/08 13:45, , 244F
06/08 13:45, 244F
噓
06/08 13:46, , 245F
06/08 13:46, 245F
推
06/08 13:48, , 246F
06/08 13:48, 246F
推
06/08 13:52, , 247F
06/08 13:52, 247F
推
06/08 13:53, , 248F
06/08 13:53, 248F
推
06/08 13:59, , 249F
06/08 13:59, 249F
→
06/08 13:59, , 250F
06/08 13:59, 250F
推
06/08 14:12, , 251F
06/08 14:12, 251F
推
06/08 14:14, , 252F
06/08 14:14, 252F
推
06/08 14:14, , 253F
06/08 14:14, 253F
→
06/08 14:14, , 254F
06/08 14:14, 254F
噓
06/08 14:15, , 255F
06/08 14:15, 255F
推
06/08 14:25, , 256F
06/08 14:25, 256F
噓
06/08 14:34, , 257F
06/08 14:34, 257F
→
06/08 14:34, , 258F
06/08 14:34, 258F
推
06/08 14:35, , 259F
06/08 14:35, 259F
→
06/08 14:35, , 260F
06/08 14:35, 260F
→
06/08 14:47, , 261F
06/08 14:47, 261F
推
06/08 14:51, , 262F
06/08 14:51, 262F
噓
06/08 14:51, , 263F
06/08 14:51, 263F
噓
06/08 15:11, , 264F
06/08 15:11, 264F
→
06/08 15:31, , 265F
06/08 15:31, 265F
→
06/08 16:00, , 266F
06/08 16:00, 266F
噓
06/08 16:05, , 267F
06/08 16:05, 267F
噓
06/08 16:20, , 268F
06/08 16:20, 268F
→
06/08 16:20, , 269F
06/08 16:20, 269F
→
06/08 16:21, , 270F
06/08 16:21, 270F
→
06/08 16:21, , 271F
06/08 16:21, 271F
→
06/08 16:22, , 272F
06/08 16:22, 272F
→
06/08 16:22, , 273F
06/08 16:22, 273F
→
06/08 16:24, , 274F
06/08 16:24, 274F
噓
06/08 18:09, , 275F
06/08 18:09, 275F
噓
06/08 18:13, , 276F
06/08 18:13, 276F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):