Re: [討論] Maker是否已經和Ingram黃金交叉了
※ 引述《whitetiger (官大學問大。)》之銘言:
: Maker慢慢已經在公鹿找到定位,球季末到現在季後賽,幾乎都排上先發,也都打有模
: 有樣,當初版上一堆人看衰 %%%%%%
: 反觀Ingram看了整季連個模樣都沒有,我認同他還非常單薄也還年輕,但我也看不出
: 湖人的養成方向,先發有學長搶球投就算了,連打替補陣容都沒球權,講難聽一點
: 只是上去折返跑而已,看了幾場湖人幾乎沒有設定戰術給他進攻,為何不乾脆讓他在
: 替補陣容有最大開火權? 看起來第一年就這樣揮霍掉,很快就下一球季,萬一再沒明顯
: 成長,可以想像版上一票人會酸爆湖人 wwwwwwww
Ingram :
G PTS TRB AST FG% 3P% FT%
79 9.4 4.0 2.1 40.2 29.4 62.1
Maker :
57 4.0 2.0 0.4 45.9 37.8 65.3
看不出來Maker哪裡贏?
附上Ingram逐月,拿他季初表現看可能會有偏差
G PTS TRB AST FG% 3P% FT%
OCT 3 6.7 2.7 0.7 44.4 16.7 75
NOV 17 7.8 3.8 2.0 34.4 30.6 75.6
DEC 16 7.1 4.8 2.1 33.6 20.6 61.8
JAN 15 9.1 3.7 2.1 37.7 33.3 62.5
FEB 10 10.0 4.4 1.9 43.7 35.5 48.1
MAR 11 13.5 4.1 2.4 51.7 30.0 53.1
APR 7 12.7 3.4 2.9 42.4 25.0 62.5
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.225.38.85
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1492788811.A.CD3.html
推
04/21 23:36, , 1F
04/21 23:36, 1F
推
04/21 23:37, , 2F
04/21 23:37, 2F
推
04/21 23:38, , 3F
04/21 23:38, 3F
講白了我並不信任這數據,因為他並沒有告訴你它公式怎麼算的
而且不同球隊的球員很顯然比起來會失真
→
04/21 23:38, , 4F
04/21 23:38, 4F
噓
04/21 23:40, , 5F
04/21 23:40, 5F
命中率附給你看了,半斤八兩
Maker真的打這麼好怎麼一直搶不到上場時間?
推
04/21 23:43, , 6F
04/21 23:43, 6F
推
04/21 23:43, , 7F
04/21 23:43, 7F
※ 編輯: richard1003 (36.225.38.85), 04/21/2017 23:47:48
推
04/21 23:47, , 8F
04/21 23:47, 8F
推
04/21 23:49, , 9F
04/21 23:49, 9F
→
04/21 23:49, , 10F
04/21 23:49, 10F
公式呢? 而且你有沒有發現排後面的幾乎都是戰績差球隊的球員?
會被球隊表現影響的話看不出這球員表現的,頂多只能跟同隊的比
※ 編輯: richard1003 (36.225.38.85), 04/21/2017 23:51:51
→
04/21 23:50, , 11F
04/21 23:50, 11F
籃球數據一直是有爭議的,因為它不像棒球每個PLAY是獨立事件
籃球每個PLAY場上十人同時動作,像PRM這樣的數據要怎麼確定它顯示的是哪個面向?
推
04/21 23:50, , 12F
04/21 23:50, 12F
→
04/21 23:50, , 13F
04/21 23:50, 13F
→
04/21 23:52, , 14F
04/21 23:52, 14F
→
04/21 23:52, , 15F
04/21 23:52, 15F
※ 編輯: richard1003 (36.225.38.85), 04/21/2017 23:55:41
→
04/21 23:53, , 16F
04/21 23:53, 16F
→
04/21 23:55, , 17F
04/21 23:55, 17F
→
04/21 23:55, , 18F
04/21 23:55, 18F
→
04/21 23:58, , 19F
04/21 23:58, 19F
先有雞還是先有蛋?
→
04/21 23:59, , 20F
04/21 23:59, 20F
推
04/21 23:59, , 21F
04/21 23:59, 21F
→
04/22 00:00, , 22F
04/22 00:00, 22F
推
04/22 00:01, , 23F
04/22 00:01, 23F
※ 編輯: richard1003 (36.225.38.85), 04/22/2017 00:02:47
→
04/22 00:02, , 24F
04/22 00:02, 24F
→
04/22 00:03, , 25F
04/22 00:03, 25F
到時候歡迎你挖數據來反駁我,這你專長嘛
※ 編輯: richard1003 (36.225.38.85), 04/22/2017 00:05:34
→
04/22 00:04, , 26F
04/22 00:04, 26F
我說過我不信任這數據了,要找也會找別的
※ 編輯: richard1003 (36.225.38.85), 04/22/2017 00:06:38
→
04/22 00:06, , 27F
04/22 00:06, 27F
→
04/22 00:06, , 28F
04/22 00:06, 28F
時間沒意義?你要不要看看四年前字母哥新秀年的數據?比Ingram還差一點喔
那時候公鹿15勝,正是你說的搶狀元球隊,時間太有意義了
還有 29 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
04/22 00:52, , 58F
04/22 00:52, 58F
→
04/22 00:52, , 59F
04/22 00:52, 59F
→
04/22 00:52, , 60F
04/22 00:52, 60F
→
04/22 00:53, , 61F
04/22 00:53, 61F
→
04/22 00:59, , 62F
04/22 00:59, 62F
→
04/22 00:59, , 63F
04/22 00:59, 63F
→
04/22 01:07, , 64F
04/22 01:07, 64F
推
04/22 01:15, , 65F
04/22 01:15, 65F
→
04/22 01:17, , 66F
04/22 01:17, 66F
→
04/22 01:17, , 67F
04/22 01:17, 67F
噓
04/22 01:25, , 68F
04/22 01:25, 68F
噓
04/22 01:29, , 69F
04/22 01:29, 69F
噓
04/22 01:57, , 70F
04/22 01:57, 70F
→
04/22 01:57, , 71F
04/22 01:57, 71F
推
04/22 02:42, , 72F
04/22 02:42, 72F
→
04/22 02:43, , 73F
04/22 02:43, 73F
噓
04/22 02:47, , 74F
04/22 02:47, 74F
推
04/22 03:11, , 75F
04/22 03:11, 75F
噓
04/22 04:18, , 76F
04/22 04:18, 76F
噓
04/22 04:18, , 77F
04/22 04:18, 77F
噓
04/22 04:19, , 78F
04/22 04:19, 78F
→
04/22 06:02, , 79F
04/22 06:02, 79F
推
04/22 06:48, , 80F
04/22 06:48, 80F
推
04/22 07:06, , 81F
04/22 07:06, 81F
推
04/22 07:09, , 82F
04/22 07:09, 82F
推
04/22 07:23, , 83F
04/22 07:23, 83F
噓
04/22 08:29, , 84F
04/22 08:29, 84F
噓
04/22 08:49, , 85F
04/22 08:49, 85F
→
04/22 08:49, , 86F
04/22 08:49, 86F
→
04/22 08:50, , 87F
04/22 08:50, 87F
→
04/22 08:50, , 88F
04/22 08:50, 88F
→
04/22 08:51, , 89F
04/22 08:51, 89F
→
04/22 08:51, , 90F
04/22 08:51, 90F
→
04/22 08:52, , 91F
04/22 08:52, 91F
推
04/22 09:07, , 92F
04/22 09:07, 92F
→
04/22 09:14, , 93F
04/22 09:14, 93F
推
04/22 10:55, , 94F
04/22 10:55, 94F
→
04/22 10:55, , 95F
04/22 10:55, 95F
噓
04/22 19:56, , 96F
04/22 19:56, 96F
推
04/23 10:13, , 97F
04/23 10:13, 97F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):