Re: [討論] 甜瓜好像有點可憐消失
常看到批瓜的,有以下幾個論點。
與lbj齊名,現在淪落到這樣~
一開始齊名不代表啥啊,肥頓一開始也跟cp3齊名,
實力不如本來就會拉開。難道後期還有媒體在捧說,
瓜是lbj宿敵,肥頓是cp3宿敵?
獨自帶隊能力差,所以不是巨星。
ad很強、戰績也帶不起來;表弟也很強,但沒進過季後
厄文在lbj來之前,也沒摸過季後賽。瓜好歹也進過好幾次
季後,還進過西冠。
瓜瓜領高薪不作事,當小倫。
的確有時我覺他求勝心不夠,但他獨善其身
至少交出的數據,絕對稱不上小倫,連14季場均20分以上
籃板6個多。
瓜瓜打球超獨,助攻少
瓜直到兩年前,打法都蠻獨沒錯,但老實說有些人就是喜歡
看打球夠獨的球星。這兩年能力退化,有比較肯傳了
但本季助攻還是沒破3,這不太清楚,不過印像中跑喬治跟雷納德
助攻也只有3到4次
瓜瓜沒料,只會捧進攻手段多
他巔峰時進攻手段不少,但這兩年真的剩跳投,單調
至於沒料……如果一個拿過得分王、連14季場均20分以上
累積得分超過巴克利,入選過四次美國隊的球員沒料,
那我真不知聯盟一大票球員是什麼……
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 112.104.193.45
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1487294221.A.1C1.html
※ 編輯: carmeloeat (112.104.193.45), 02/17/2017 09:17:58
推
02/17 09:19, , 1F
02/17 09:19, 1F
→
02/17 09:19, , 2F
02/17 09:19, 2F
推
02/17 09:19, , 3F
02/17 09:19, 3F
推
02/17 09:19, , 4F
02/17 09:19, 4F
推
02/17 09:19, , 5F
02/17 09:19, 5F
→
02/17 09:20, , 6F
02/17 09:20, 6F
→
02/17 09:20, , 7F
02/17 09:20, 7F
推
02/17 09:22, , 8F
02/17 09:22, 8F
→
02/17 09:22, , 9F
02/17 09:22, 9F
→
02/17 09:22, , 10F
02/17 09:22, 10F
推
02/17 09:22, , 11F
02/17 09:22, 11F
→
02/17 09:23, , 12F
02/17 09:23, 12F
→
02/17 09:23, , 13F
02/17 09:23, 13F
→
02/17 09:23, , 14F
02/17 09:23, 14F
→
02/17 09:24, , 15F
02/17 09:24, 15F
→
02/17 09:25, , 16F
02/17 09:25, 16F
→
02/17 09:25, , 17F
02/17 09:25, 17F
→
02/17 09:27, , 18F
02/17 09:27, 18F
推
02/17 09:27, , 19F
02/17 09:27, 19F
→
02/17 09:27, , 20F
02/17 09:27, 20F
推
02/17 09:31, , 21F
02/17 09:31, 21F
推
02/17 09:31, , 22F
02/17 09:31, 22F
→
02/17 09:31, , 23F
02/17 09:31, 23F
→
02/17 09:32, , 24F
02/17 09:32, 24F
→
02/17 09:32, , 25F
02/17 09:32, 25F
推
02/17 09:34, , 26F
02/17 09:34, 26F
推
02/17 09:34, , 27F
02/17 09:34, 27F
推
02/17 09:36, , 28F
02/17 09:36, 28F
推
02/17 09:37, , 29F
02/17 09:37, 29F
推
02/17 09:38, , 30F
02/17 09:38, 30F
→
02/17 09:38, , 31F
02/17 09:38, 31F
→
02/17 09:38, , 32F
02/17 09:38, 32F
→
02/17 09:39, , 33F
02/17 09:39, 33F
推
02/17 09:40, , 34F
02/17 09:40, 34F
→
02/17 09:40, , 35F
02/17 09:40, 35F
推
02/17 09:42, , 36F
02/17 09:42, 36F
→
02/17 09:42, , 37F
02/17 09:42, 37F
→
02/17 09:44, , 38F
02/17 09:44, 38F
推
02/17 09:45, , 39F
02/17 09:45, 39F
還有 27 則推文
→
02/17 10:54, , 67F
02/17 10:54, 67F
→
02/17 10:55, , 68F
02/17 10:55, 68F
推
02/17 10:57, , 69F
02/17 10:57, 69F
→
02/17 11:08, , 70F
02/17 11:08, 70F
→
02/17 11:08, , 71F
02/17 11:08, 71F
推
02/17 11:10, , 72F
02/17 11:10, 72F
推
02/17 11:25, , 73F
02/17 11:25, 73F
→
02/17 11:27, , 74F
02/17 11:27, 74F
→
02/17 11:28, , 75F
02/17 11:28, 75F
→
02/17 11:29, , 76F
02/17 11:29, 76F
推
02/17 11:38, , 77F
02/17 11:38, 77F
噓
02/17 11:38, , 78F
02/17 11:38, 78F
→
02/17 11:39, , 79F
02/17 11:39, 79F
→
02/17 11:39, , 80F
02/17 11:39, 80F
→
02/17 11:40, , 81F
02/17 11:40, 81F
→
02/17 11:40, , 82F
02/17 11:40, 82F
→
02/17 11:41, , 83F
02/17 11:41, 83F
→
02/17 11:41, , 84F
02/17 11:41, 84F
→
02/17 11:42, , 85F
02/17 11:42, 85F
推
02/17 11:45, , 86F
02/17 11:45, 86F
→
02/17 11:45, , 87F
02/17 11:45, 87F
→
02/17 11:47, , 88F
02/17 11:47, 88F
→
02/17 11:48, , 89F
02/17 11:48, 89F
推
02/17 11:52, , 90F
02/17 11:52, 90F
→
02/17 11:53, , 91F
02/17 11:53, 91F
→
02/17 11:54, , 92F
02/17 11:54, 92F
→
02/17 12:01, , 93F
02/17 12:01, 93F
→
02/17 12:01, , 94F
02/17 12:01, 94F
→
02/17 12:01, , 95F
02/17 12:01, 95F
推
02/17 12:22, , 96F
02/17 12:22, 96F
→
02/17 12:22, , 97F
02/17 12:22, 97F
→
02/17 12:22, , 98F
02/17 12:22, 98F
→
02/17 12:23, , 99F
02/17 12:23, 99F
→
02/17 12:23, , 100F
02/17 12:23, 100F
→
02/17 12:23, , 101F
02/17 12:23, 101F
→
02/17 12:23, , 102F
02/17 12:23, 102F
推
02/17 12:29, , 103F
02/17 12:29, 103F
→
02/17 12:30, , 104F
02/17 12:30, 104F
推
02/17 12:38, , 105F
02/17 12:38, 105F
→
02/17 12:52, , 106F
02/17 12:52, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 20 篇):
討論
53
200
討論
19
95
討論
34
205
討論
7
34
討論
32
106
討論
18
45
討論
291
619
討論
51
135
討論
34
63
討論
37
85