[討論] CJ會不會取代Lillard變一哥?消失
C.J Mccollum,拓荒者隊新星,本季usg來到28%,只少小李3%
而他本季的數據如下~
場均23.4分、3.6助、命中率48%、三分41.5%
而小李本季的數據~
場均26.3分、5.8助、命中率44.4%、三分34.5%
進攻端兩人已經拉近,且CJ的命中率更好,
而防守端,兩人都不算好,但進階數據CJ仍勝過小李
雖然感覺CJ不是想爭一哥的人,但這很難說,
當初公牛隊吉巴也說,自已只想當個副手,但當他和rose
的實力拉開,自然而然就變一哥了…
大家覺得CJ適合當拓荒一哥嗎??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 112.104.193.45
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1485770459.A.3ED.html
推
01/30 18:04, , 1F
01/30 18:04, 1F
推
01/30 18:04, , 2F
01/30 18:04, 2F
推
01/30 18:04, , 3F
01/30 18:04, 3F
→
01/30 18:04, , 4F
01/30 18:04, 4F
推
01/30 18:07, , 5F
01/30 18:07, 5F
推
01/30 18:08, , 6F
01/30 18:08, 6F
推
01/30 18:08, , 7F
01/30 18:08, 7F
推
01/30 18:08, , 8F
01/30 18:08, 8F
→
01/30 18:08, , 9F
01/30 18:08, 9F
→
01/30 18:09, , 10F
01/30 18:09, 10F
→
01/30 18:10, , 11F
01/30 18:10, 11F
推
01/30 18:12, , 12F
01/30 18:12, 12F
推
01/30 18:12, , 13F
01/30 18:12, 13F
→
01/30 18:13, , 14F
01/30 18:13, 14F
推
01/30 18:13, , 15F
01/30 18:13, 15F
推
01/30 18:16, , 16F
01/30 18:16, 16F
→
01/30 18:16, , 17F
01/30 18:16, 17F
推
01/30 18:18, , 18F
01/30 18:18, 18F
推
01/30 18:19, , 19F
01/30 18:19, 19F
推
01/30 18:20, , 20F
01/30 18:20, 20F
推
01/30 18:21, , 21F
01/30 18:21, 21F
→
01/30 18:21, , 22F
01/30 18:21, 22F
→
01/30 18:21, , 23F
01/30 18:21, 23F
推
01/30 18:22, , 24F
01/30 18:22, 24F
推
01/30 18:22, , 25F
01/30 18:22, 25F
推
01/30 18:24, , 26F
01/30 18:24, 26F
推
01/30 18:26, , 27F
01/30 18:26, 27F
推
01/30 18:27, , 28F
01/30 18:27, 28F
推
01/30 18:27, , 29F
01/30 18:27, 29F
推
01/30 18:29, , 30F
01/30 18:29, 30F
推
01/30 18:32, , 31F
01/30 18:32, 31F
推
01/30 18:32, , 32F
01/30 18:32, 32F
→
01/30 18:36, , 33F
01/30 18:36, 33F
推
01/30 18:36, , 34F
01/30 18:36, 34F
推
01/30 18:38, , 35F
01/30 18:38, 35F
推
01/30 18:39, , 36F
01/30 18:39, 36F
→
01/30 18:40, , 37F
01/30 18:40, 37F
推
01/30 18:41, , 38F
01/30 18:41, 38F
推
01/30 18:42, , 39F
01/30 18:42, 39F
還有 47 則推文
→
01/30 20:33, , 87F
01/30 20:33, 87F
推
01/30 20:51, , 88F
01/30 20:51, 88F
推
01/30 20:56, , 89F
01/30 20:56, 89F
推
01/30 21:16, , 90F
01/30 21:16, 90F
推
01/30 21:40, , 91F
01/30 21:40, 91F
推
01/30 21:40, , 92F
01/30 21:40, 92F
推
01/30 21:45, , 93F
01/30 21:45, 93F
→
01/30 21:47, , 94F
01/30 21:47, 94F
推
01/30 21:54, , 95F
01/30 21:54, 95F
推
01/30 22:00, , 96F
01/30 22:00, 96F
推
01/30 22:05, , 97F
01/30 22:05, 97F
→
01/30 22:05, , 98F
01/30 22:05, 98F
推
01/30 22:33, , 99F
01/30 22:33, 99F
推
01/30 22:35, , 100F
01/30 22:35, 100F
推
01/30 22:36, , 101F
01/30 22:36, 101F
推
01/30 22:40, , 102F
01/30 22:40, 102F
→
01/30 22:40, , 103F
01/30 22:40, 103F
→
01/30 22:41, , 104F
01/30 22:41, 104F
推
01/30 22:44, , 105F
01/30 22:44, 105F
推
01/30 22:57, , 106F
01/30 22:57, 106F
→
01/30 23:03, , 107F
01/30 23:03, 107F
推
01/30 23:12, , 108F
01/30 23:12, 108F
推
01/31 00:08, , 109F
01/31 00:08, 109F
推
01/31 00:34, , 110F
01/31 00:34, 110F
推
01/31 00:38, , 111F
01/31 00:38, 111F
推
01/31 00:53, , 112F
01/31 00:53, 112F
→
01/31 01:27, , 113F
01/31 01:27, 113F
推
01/31 01:32, , 114F
01/31 01:32, 114F
→
01/31 01:32, , 115F
01/31 01:32, 115F
推
01/31 03:04, , 116F
01/31 03:04, 116F
→
01/31 03:04, , 117F
01/31 03:04, 117F
→
01/31 03:04, , 118F
01/31 03:04, 118F
→
01/31 03:04, , 119F
01/31 03:04, 119F
推
01/31 06:49, , 120F
01/31 06:49, 120F
推
01/31 10:15, , 121F
01/31 10:15, 121F
推
01/31 10:44, , 122F
01/31 10:44, 122F
推
01/31 10:51, , 123F
01/31 10:51, 123F
推
01/31 10:57, , 124F
01/31 10:57, 124F
→
01/31 10:57, , 125F
01/31 10:57, 125F
→
01/31 12:51, , 126F
01/31 12:51, 126F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):