[討論] Curry為何不在三分線外刻意買犯?
看板NBA作者king90333 (NoDoubtAboutCardinals)時間7年前 (2016/07/14 00:37)推噓-6(45推 51噓 99→)留言195則, 111人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
看了一整季勇士的比賽
三分線賴犯規這招在Curry身上真的很少看到
打從季後賽開始 勇士對上的球隊
對付Curry的策略幾乎就是放切不放投
從Curry在三分線外盤球開始就開始緊黏著他
這種情況到了總冠軍戰時更加明顯
很多情況Curry佯切時防守球員還是不輕易往內線收縮以防止Curry的切入
常常Curry一個後撤步 對位的防守球員就撲上去準備干擾Curry
但是Curry還是出手了 以他平均0.3s的出手速度
但這個時候為何Curry不順勢做個假動作
再往防守球員身上一靠 賴個犯規?
當防守球員跳在空中 往他身上一靠這種出手 裁判不是幾乎必吹嗎?
我知道對於聯盟來說
一個球星刻意買犯的行為 對比賽節奏跟精彩度都不ok
但不可否認 賴犯規的確是能對敵隊造成重大傷害的一種手段
以Curry本季的罰球命中率 送他上罰球線根本是三分穩穩入袋
又能造成對方的犯規麻煩
而且下一次對手準備要跳起來干擾Curry的出手時也會有所猶豫
也能為Curry爭取更大的出手空間
其實這招蠻多球星都會用
像是PP KD等…
所以要是Curry把這招也廣泛應用於場上時
是否就更加難以對付了?
是因為想要拼三分球數的紀錄?
還是因為不屑成為某大幫派的旗下弟子呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.217.134.237
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1468427826.A.7F1.html
→
07/14 00:38, , 1F
07/14 00:38, 1F
推
07/14 00:38, , 2F
07/14 00:38, 2F
→
07/14 00:38, , 3F
07/14 00:38, 3F
→
07/14 00:38, , 4F
07/14 00:38, 4F
→
07/14 00:38, , 5F
07/14 00:38, 5F
→
07/14 00:38, , 6F
07/14 00:38, 6F
推
07/14 00:38, , 7F
07/14 00:38, 7F
→
07/14 00:39, , 8F
07/14 00:39, 8F
→
07/14 00:39, , 9F
07/14 00:39, 9F
推
07/14 00:39, , 10F
07/14 00:39, 10F
推
07/14 00:39, , 11F
07/14 00:39, 11F
→
07/14 00:39, , 12F
07/14 00:39, 12F
→
07/14 00:39, , 13F
07/14 00:39, 13F
推
07/14 00:39, , 14F
07/14 00:39, 14F
→
07/14 00:39, , 15F
07/14 00:39, 15F
→
07/14 00:40, , 16F
07/14 00:40, 16F
→
07/14 00:40, , 17F
07/14 00:40, 17F
→
07/14 00:40, , 18F
07/14 00:40, 18F
推
07/14 00:40, , 19F
07/14 00:40, 19F
→
07/14 00:40, , 20F
07/14 00:40, 20F
→
07/14 00:40, , 21F
07/14 00:40, 21F
噓
07/14 00:40, , 22F
07/14 00:40, 22F
噓
07/14 00:40, , 23F
07/14 00:40, 23F
推
07/14 00:41, , 24F
07/14 00:41, 24F
噓
07/14 00:41, , 25F
07/14 00:41, 25F
→
07/14 00:41, , 26F
07/14 00:41, 26F
噓
07/14 00:42, , 27F
07/14 00:42, 27F
→
07/14 00:42, , 28F
07/14 00:42, 28F
→
07/14 00:42, , 29F
07/14 00:42, 29F
噓
07/14 00:42, , 30F
07/14 00:42, 30F
噓
07/14 00:42, , 31F
07/14 00:42, 31F
→
07/14 00:42, , 32F
07/14 00:42, 32F
推
07/14 00:42, , 33F
07/14 00:42, 33F
推
07/14 00:42, , 34F
07/14 00:42, 34F
→
07/14 00:43, , 35F
07/14 00:43, 35F
→
07/14 00:43, , 36F
07/14 00:43, 36F
→
07/14 00:43, , 37F
07/14 00:43, 37F
→
07/14 00:43, , 38F
07/14 00:43, 38F
噓
07/14 00:43, , 39F
07/14 00:43, 39F
還有 116 則推文
推
07/14 08:36, , 156F
07/14 08:36, 156F
→
07/14 08:37, , 157F
07/14 08:37, 157F
→
07/14 08:39, , 158F
07/14 08:39, 158F
→
07/14 08:41, , 159F
07/14 08:41, 159F
→
07/14 08:41, , 160F
07/14 08:41, 160F
→
07/14 08:42, , 161F
07/14 08:42, 161F
→
07/14 08:55, , 162F
07/14 08:55, 162F
→
07/14 08:55, , 163F
07/14 08:55, 163F
推
07/14 09:00, , 164F
07/14 09:00, 164F
→
07/14 09:01, , 165F
07/14 09:01, 165F
→
07/14 09:04, , 166F
07/14 09:04, 166F
噓
07/14 09:09, , 167F
07/14 09:09, 167F
→
07/14 09:15, , 168F
07/14 09:15, 168F
噓
07/14 09:15, , 169F
07/14 09:15, 169F
噓
07/14 09:41, , 170F
07/14 09:41, 170F
噓
07/14 09:49, , 171F
07/14 09:49, 171F
噓
07/14 10:11, , 172F
07/14 10:11, 172F
噓
07/14 10:21, , 173F
07/14 10:21, 173F
推
07/14 10:22, , 174F
07/14 10:22, 174F
推
07/14 10:26, , 175F
07/14 10:26, 175F
→
07/14 10:48, , 176F
07/14 10:48, 176F
→
07/14 10:48, , 177F
07/14 10:48, 177F
→
07/14 10:53, , 178F
07/14 10:53, 178F
→
07/14 10:53, , 179F
07/14 10:53, 179F
推
07/14 11:06, , 180F
07/14 11:06, 180F
推
07/14 11:16, , 181F
07/14 11:16, 181F
噓
07/14 11:47, , 182F
07/14 11:47, 182F
噓
07/14 11:58, , 183F
07/14 11:58, 183F
噓
07/14 12:00, , 184F
07/14 12:00, 184F
→
07/14 12:00, , 185F
07/14 12:00, 185F
→
07/14 12:00, , 186F
07/14 12:00, 186F
→
07/14 12:01, , 187F
07/14 12:01, 187F
→
07/14 12:01, , 188F
07/14 12:01, 188F
→
07/14 12:34, , 189F
07/14 12:34, 189F
噓
07/14 12:34, , 190F
07/14 12:34, 190F
推
07/14 13:02, , 191F
07/14 13:02, 191F
噓
07/14 14:41, , 192F
07/14 14:41, 192F
噓
07/14 16:33, , 193F
07/14 16:33, 193F
噓
07/14 18:24, , 194F
07/14 18:24, 194F
→
07/14 23:24, , 195F
07/14 23:24, 195F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):