[討論] 當初雷霆放走鬍子是不是有點失策
2012冠軍賽雷霆陣容以現在來看蠻夢幻的
KD+神龜+鬍子+鍋神Ibaka 雖然被三王熱火慘電
但這陣容再磨一兩年蠻有機會建立王朝的
當年雷霆制服組在Ibaka和鬍子中選擇了禁區大將Ibaka是可以理解的決定
但為啥不兩個都留? 儘管後面幾年薪資狀況可能會被卡死
但確立了四少為主體的核心陣容 依照雷霆總管的搶劫能力
要建立長達至少五年的強權霸業是完全有可能的
一但奪冠希望濃厚 自然容易吸引一些渴望冠軍的老將底薪加盟
看看這個主要核心群 一個相當穩定的建隊基石 一個容易腦衝的超速控衛
一個打法詭異的搶分第六人 是不是有點像馬刺GDP
後續沒能留住鬍子 也像骨牌效應一樣 先傷西河 再傷雷帝
總算磨出一個有機會匹敵當年的組合 又因為替補太弱而被逆轉 最後走了雷帝
感覺當年鬍子走後 雷霆一直再找接替鬍子的人選
那當初放走鬍子 是不是雷霆制服組最大的失策?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.250.201.140
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1468208501.A.9FD.html
噓
07/11 11:42, , 1F
07/11 11:42, 1F
推
07/11 11:42, , 2F
07/11 11:42, 2F
→
07/11 11:43, , 3F
07/11 11:43, 3F
→
07/11 11:43, , 4F
07/11 11:43, 4F
推
07/11 11:43, , 5F
07/11 11:43, 5F
→
07/11 11:43, , 6F
07/11 11:43, 6F
→
07/11 11:43, , 7F
07/11 11:43, 7F
推
07/11 11:44, , 8F
07/11 11:44, 8F
噓
07/11 11:44, , 9F
07/11 11:44, 9F
推
07/11 11:44, , 10F
07/11 11:44, 10F
→
07/11 11:44, , 11F
07/11 11:44, 11F
推
07/11 11:45, , 12F
07/11 11:45, 12F
噓
07/11 11:45, , 13F
07/11 11:45, 13F
→
07/11 11:45, , 14F
07/11 11:45, 14F
→
07/11 11:46, , 15F
07/11 11:46, 15F
→
07/11 11:46, , 16F
07/11 11:46, 16F
噓
07/11 11:47, , 17F
07/11 11:47, 17F
推
07/11 11:47, , 18F
07/11 11:47, 18F
→
07/11 11:47, , 19F
07/11 11:47, 19F
推
07/11 11:47, , 20F
07/11 11:47, 20F
噓
07/11 11:48, , 21F
07/11 11:48, 21F
噓
07/11 11:49, , 22F
07/11 11:49, 22F
推
07/11 11:49, , 23F
07/11 11:49, 23F
推
07/11 11:49, , 24F
07/11 11:49, 24F
噓
07/11 11:50, , 25F
07/11 11:50, 25F
噓
07/11 11:50, , 26F
07/11 11:50, 26F
→
07/11 11:50, , 27F
07/11 11:50, 27F
→
07/11 11:50, , 28F
07/11 11:50, 28F
→
07/11 11:51, , 29F
07/11 11:51, 29F
噓
07/11 11:51, , 30F
07/11 11:51, 30F
→
07/11 11:51, , 31F
07/11 11:51, 31F
→
07/11 11:52, , 32F
07/11 11:52, 32F
→
07/11 11:52, , 33F
07/11 11:52, 33F
→
07/11 11:52, , 34F
07/11 11:52, 34F
噓
07/11 11:53, , 35F
07/11 11:53, 35F
→
07/11 11:53, , 36F
07/11 11:53, 36F
推
07/11 11:54, , 37F
07/11 11:54, 37F
→
07/11 11:54, , 38F
07/11 11:54, 38F
噓
07/11 11:55, , 39F
07/11 11:55, 39F
還有 24 則推文
噓
07/11 12:11, , 64F
07/11 12:11, 64F
→
07/11 12:11, , 65F
07/11 12:11, 65F
→
07/11 12:12, , 66F
07/11 12:12, 66F
→
07/11 12:12, , 67F
07/11 12:12, 67F
噓
07/11 12:15, , 68F
07/11 12:15, 68F
噓
07/11 12:15, , 69F
07/11 12:15, 69F
→
07/11 12:16, , 70F
07/11 12:16, 70F
噓
07/11 12:18, , 71F
07/11 12:18, 71F
噓
07/11 12:19, , 72F
07/11 12:19, 72F
推
07/11 12:20, , 73F
07/11 12:20, 73F
→
07/11 12:20, , 74F
07/11 12:20, 74F
→
07/11 12:21, , 75F
07/11 12:21, 75F
→
07/11 12:21, , 76F
07/11 12:21, 76F
噓
07/11 12:25, , 77F
07/11 12:25, 77F
噓
07/11 12:27, , 78F
07/11 12:27, 78F
推
07/11 12:27, , 79F
07/11 12:27, 79F
→
07/11 12:27, , 80F
07/11 12:27, 80F
推
07/11 12:38, , 81F
07/11 12:38, 81F
噓
07/11 12:42, , 82F
07/11 12:42, 82F
推
07/11 12:43, , 83F
07/11 12:43, 83F
→
07/11 12:45, , 84F
07/11 12:45, 84F
→
07/11 13:00, , 85F
07/11 13:00, 85F
→
07/11 13:04, , 86F
07/11 13:04, 86F
噓
07/11 13:10, , 87F
07/11 13:10, 87F
推
07/11 13:16, , 88F
07/11 13:16, 88F
推
07/11 13:16, , 89F
07/11 13:16, 89F
推
07/11 13:16, , 90F
07/11 13:16, 90F
→
07/11 13:16, , 91F
07/11 13:16, 91F
噓
07/11 13:47, , 92F
07/11 13:47, 92F
噓
07/11 13:53, , 93F
07/11 13:53, 93F
推
07/11 14:59, , 94F
07/11 14:59, 94F
→
07/11 15:02, , 95F
07/11 15:02, 95F
推
07/11 15:26, , 96F
07/11 15:26, 96F
噓
07/11 15:28, , 97F
07/11 15:28, 97F
→
07/11 15:29, , 98F
07/11 15:29, 98F
噓
07/11 15:35, , 99F
07/11 15:35, 99F
推
07/11 17:02, , 100F
07/11 17:02, 100F
→
07/11 18:32, , 101F
07/11 18:32, 101F
→
07/11 18:33, , 102F
07/11 18:33, 102F
→
07/11 18:41, , 103F
07/11 18:41, 103F