[討論] handcheck和區域聯防哪個影響比較大?
今天看了Howard 上 Barkley節目的影片,
影片中,主持人一直質問Howard為什麼說Curry的進攻強過MJ
Howard說Curry已經強到發光,進攻可能比MJ還強
然後Kenny和Barkley就一直跳針說以前的時代有Handcheck
在那種強硬身體碰撞的時代,MJ都能平均拿37分
現代他一定能平均拿45分以上
這群老球星一直狂捧Jordan,加上貶低現代的球星,來證明自己當初有多強
但是記得AI有一次上節目時
主持人問他說你剛進NBA時會不會緊張
AI很屌的說完全不會
根本沒有人有辦法一對一守住我
NBA沒有區域聯防,我可以一對一打到爽
補一下AI的訪談影片: Iverson談區域聯防 中文 https://goo.gl/kzRyxj
所以到底是Handcheck還是區域聯防影響比賽比較大?
這個問題可能永遠沒有一個標準答案
但有沒有專家能分析一下
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.46.238.251
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1463149215.A.032.html
→
05/13 22:24, , 1F
05/13 22:24, 1F
我確實這樣認為,暫時找不到影片,但真的覺得Kenny Smith超沒風度,一直狂嗆Howard
對Curry的評論
推
05/13 22:25, , 2F
05/13 22:25, 2F
→
05/13 22:25, , 3F
05/13 22:25, 3F
→
05/13 22:25, , 4F
05/13 22:25, 4F
問題是我們有打過籃球的就知道打3vs3跟打全場差超多,打33時可以完全展現自己的個人
技巧,全場會協防加上關門防守,根本沒那麼好單打,從前是單打打到爽,但有區域聯防
後,MJ一場會少幾次單打的機會??真有那麼好拿場均45分??
→
05/13 22:25, , 5F
05/13 22:25, 5F
推
05/13 22:26, , 6F
05/13 22:26, 6F
→
05/13 22:26, , 7F
05/13 22:26, 7F
※ 編輯: kblbjmj (114.46.238.251), 05/13/2016 22:28:33
→
05/13 22:27, , 8F
05/13 22:27, 8F
推
05/13 22:27, , 9F
05/13 22:27, 9F
→
05/13 22:27, , 10F
05/13 22:27, 10F
→
05/13 22:27, , 11F
05/13 22:27, 11F
→
05/13 22:27, , 12F
05/13 22:27, 12F
→
05/13 22:27, , 13F
05/13 22:27, 13F
→
05/13 22:28, , 14F
05/13 22:28, 14F
※ 編輯: kblbjmj (114.46.238.251), 05/13/2016 22:32:03
噓
05/13 22:29, , 15F
05/13 22:29, 15F
→
05/13 22:29, , 16F
05/13 22:29, 16F
推
05/13 22:29, , 17F
05/13 22:29, 17F
對,這次難得認同他,就沒叫他草莓了
→
05/13 22:29, , 18F
05/13 22:29, 18F
推
05/13 22:30, , 19F
05/13 22:30, 19F
推
05/13 22:33, , 20F
05/13 22:33, 20F
→
05/13 22:33, , 21F
05/13 22:33, 21F
→
05/13 22:33, , 22F
05/13 22:33, 22F
→
05/13 22:33, , 23F
05/13 22:33, 23F
※ 編輯: kblbjmj (114.46.238.251), 05/13/2016 22:34:25
→
05/13 22:34, , 24F
05/13 22:34, 24F
個人認為摸毛犯規是為了怕區域聯防限制球星的進攻太多而設立的,但問題是一場球下來
因為區域聯防少掉的單打次數好歹也有個五次吧,但是你的罰球次數了不起多增加個五顆
,這樣Handcheck真的有影響比較大嗎
※ 編輯: kblbjmj (114.46.238.251), 05/13/2016 22:38:42
推
05/13 22:35, , 25F
05/13 22:35, 25F
→
05/13 22:36, , 26F
05/13 22:36, 26F
→
05/13 22:37, , 27F
05/13 22:37, 27F
噓
05/13 22:37, , 28F
05/13 22:37, 28F
→
05/13 22:37, , 29F
05/13 22:37, 29F
推
05/13 22:37, , 30F
05/13 22:37, 30F
推
05/13 22:40, , 31F
05/13 22:40, 31F
→
05/13 22:40, , 32F
05/13 22:40, 32F
還有 121 則推文
還有 5 段內文
→
05/14 01:50, , 154F
05/14 01:50, 154F
→
05/14 01:50, , 155F
05/14 01:50, 155F
→
05/14 01:50, , 156F
05/14 01:50, 156F
→
05/14 01:50, , 157F
05/14 01:50, 157F
推
05/14 02:04, , 158F
05/14 02:04, 158F
→
05/14 02:04, , 159F
05/14 02:04, 159F
推
05/14 02:14, , 160F
05/14 02:14, 160F
→
05/14 02:51, , 161F
05/14 02:51, 161F
→
05/14 02:52, , 162F
05/14 02:52, 162F
→
05/14 02:53, , 163F
05/14 02:53, 163F
→
05/14 02:54, , 164F
05/14 02:54, 164F
→
05/14 02:57, , 165F
05/14 02:57, 165F
→
05/14 02:58, , 166F
05/14 02:58, 166F
→
05/14 03:00, , 167F
05/14 03:00, 167F
推
05/14 06:50, , 168F
05/14 06:50, 168F
推
05/14 10:09, , 169F
05/14 10:09, 169F
推
05/14 10:12, , 170F
05/14 10:12, 170F
→
05/14 10:36, , 171F
05/14 10:36, 171F
→
05/14 10:36, , 172F
05/14 10:36, 172F
→
05/14 10:36, , 173F
05/14 10:36, 173F
→
05/14 10:36, , 174F
05/14 10:36, 174F
推
05/14 10:45, , 175F
05/14 10:45, 175F
推
05/14 13:43, , 176F
05/14 13:43, 176F
→
05/14 13:43, , 177F
05/14 13:43, 177F
→
05/14 13:44, , 178F
05/14 13:44, 178F
→
05/14 14:28, , 179F
05/14 14:28, 179F
→
05/14 14:29, , 180F
05/14 14:29, 180F
→
05/14 14:29, , 181F
05/14 14:29, 181F
→
05/14 14:30, , 182F
05/14 14:30, 182F
→
05/14 14:31, , 183F
05/14 14:31, 183F
→
05/14 14:33, , 184F
05/14 14:33, 184F
→
05/14 14:34, , 185F
05/14 14:34, 185F
→
05/14 14:35, , 186F
05/14 14:35, 186F
→
05/14 14:37, , 187F
05/14 14:37, 187F
→
05/14 14:37, , 188F
05/14 14:37, 188F
推
05/14 15:24, , 189F
05/14 15:24, 189F
→
05/14 15:24, , 190F
05/14 15:24, 190F
→
05/14 17:36, , 191F
05/14 17:36, 191F
→
05/14 17:38, , 192F
05/14 17:38, 192F
→
05/14 17:38, , 193F
05/14 17:38, 193F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):