[討論] Tristan Thompson的價值
雖然每次騎士打完後box出來,
底下總是免不了有人推X分X籃板,姆斯我老闆來酸Thompson,
不過這次季後賽看了幾場騎士的比賽後注意一下他場上的表現,
發現他似乎有一個專長,就是特別會抓進攻籃板,
不過我們一般討論的時候通常都不會特別看進攻籃板只看總籃板,
而且進攻籃板相比防守籃板算是難抓很多,又可以有二次球權(補籃miss不算的話),
所以更是彌足珍貴。
雖然Thompson進攻能力還有待加強,
但他的這項能力,會不會就是LBJ特別出來替他護航的原因呢?
另外他的防守能力好不好我就不是很了解不多做評論,
以下附上他本季季季後賽目前的籃板統計:
R1 vs 活塞
Gm Player Min OR DR TR
1 Thompson 30:22 4 2 6
2 Thompspn 13:23 1 0 1
3 Thompspn 31:13 8 2 10
4 Thompspn 38:22 3 2 5
R2 vs 老鷹
Gm Player Min OR DR TR
1 Thompson 40:28 7 7 14
除了今天對老鷹這場打平之外,對活塞每場都是進攻籃板數>防守籃板數,
OR數除了第四場小輸Love一個都是全隊最多,
本季季後賽也愈來愈受到重用,出場時間漸增,又是undersize扛C。
另外Thompson本季例行賽的場均進攻籃板數是3.3,
排在聯盟第8左右,雖然還不能算最頂級,
但考量到他出賽的時間不算特別多,
以及他進攻籃板佔總籃板的比例也非常高,每場平均3.3個進攻籃板,5.7個防守籃板,
應該可以算是聯盟目前頂尖的進攻籃板爭搶手了,
大家覺得他目前這樣的表現離8200萬還差多少呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.132.145.238
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462262415.A.AD7.html
推
05/03 16:01, , 1F
05/03 16:01, 1F
推
05/03 16:01, , 2F
05/03 16:01, 2F
推
05/03 16:01, , 3F
05/03 16:01, 3F
推
05/03 16:01, , 4F
05/03 16:01, 4F
推
05/03 16:02, , 5F
05/03 16:02, 5F
→
05/03 16:02, , 6F
05/03 16:02, 6F
→
05/03 16:02, , 7F
05/03 16:02, 7F
→
05/03 16:02, , 8F
05/03 16:02, 8F
推
05/03 16:02, , 9F
05/03 16:02, 9F
→
05/03 16:02, , 10F
05/03 16:02, 10F
→
05/03 16:03, , 11F
05/03 16:03, 11F
→
05/03 16:03, , 12F
05/03 16:03, 12F
推
05/03 16:03, , 13F
05/03 16:03, 13F
→
05/03 16:04, , 14F
05/03 16:04, 14F
推
05/03 16:05, , 15F
05/03 16:05, 15F
推
05/03 16:05, , 16F
05/03 16:05, 16F
→
05/03 16:06, , 17F
05/03 16:06, 17F
推
05/03 16:06, , 18F
05/03 16:06, 18F
→
05/03 16:06, , 19F
05/03 16:06, 19F
推
05/03 16:06, , 20F
05/03 16:06, 20F
推
05/03 16:07, , 21F
05/03 16:07, 21F
推
05/03 16:07, , 22F
05/03 16:07, 22F
推
05/03 16:08, , 23F
05/03 16:08, 23F
→
05/03 16:08, , 24F
05/03 16:08, 24F
推
05/03 16:08, , 25F
05/03 16:08, 25F
推
05/03 16:08, , 26F
05/03 16:08, 26F
→
05/03 16:08, , 27F
05/03 16:08, 27F
→
05/03 16:09, , 28F
05/03 16:09, 28F
→
05/03 16:09, , 29F
05/03 16:09, 29F
推
05/03 16:09, , 30F
05/03 16:09, 30F
推
05/03 16:10, , 31F
05/03 16:10, 31F
→
05/03 16:10, , 32F
05/03 16:10, 32F
→
05/03 16:10, , 33F
05/03 16:10, 33F
→
05/03 16:10, , 34F
05/03 16:10, 34F
→
05/03 16:10, , 35F
05/03 16:10, 35F
推
05/03 16:11, , 36F
05/03 16:11, 36F
推
05/03 16:12, , 37F
05/03 16:12, 37F
推
05/03 16:12, , 38F
05/03 16:12, 38F
→
05/03 16:12, , 39F
05/03 16:12, 39F
還有 120 則推文
還有 3 段內文
推
05/03 18:32, , 160F
05/03 18:32, 160F
→
05/03 19:02, , 161F
05/03 19:02, 161F
推
05/03 19:02, , 162F
05/03 19:02, 162F
推
05/03 19:03, , 163F
05/03 19:03, 163F
→
05/03 19:04, , 164F
05/03 19:04, 164F
→
05/03 19:04, , 165F
05/03 19:04, 165F
推
05/03 19:11, , 166F
05/03 19:11, 166F
推
05/03 19:13, , 167F
05/03 19:13, 167F
→
05/03 19:13, , 168F
05/03 19:13, 168F
→
05/03 19:14, , 169F
05/03 19:14, 169F
推
05/03 19:20, , 170F
05/03 19:20, 170F
→
05/03 19:23, , 171F
05/03 19:23, 171F
推
05/03 19:40, , 172F
05/03 19:40, 172F
→
05/03 19:44, , 173F
05/03 19:44, 173F
推
05/03 20:01, , 174F
05/03 20:01, 174F
→
05/03 20:04, , 175F
05/03 20:04, 175F
→
05/03 20:05, , 176F
05/03 20:05, 176F
→
05/03 20:06, , 177F
05/03 20:06, 177F
→
05/03 20:07, , 178F
05/03 20:07, 178F
→
05/03 20:09, , 179F
05/03 20:09, 179F
→
05/03 20:11, , 180F
05/03 20:11, 180F
推
05/03 20:29, , 181F
05/03 20:29, 181F
推
05/03 20:32, , 182F
05/03 20:32, 182F
→
05/03 20:32, , 183F
05/03 20:32, 183F
→
05/03 20:32, , 184F
05/03 20:32, 184F
→
05/03 20:39, , 185F
05/03 20:39, 185F
→
05/03 20:54, , 186F
05/03 20:54, 186F
→
05/03 21:37, , 187F
05/03 21:37, 187F
噓
05/03 22:18, , 188F
05/03 22:18, 188F
推
05/03 22:43, , 189F
05/03 22:43, 189F
噓
05/03 23:04, , 190F
05/03 23:04, 190F
噓
05/03 23:18, , 191F
05/03 23:18, 191F
推
05/04 00:02, , 192F
05/04 00:02, 192F
推
05/04 00:04, , 193F
05/04 00:04, 193F
推
05/04 00:24, , 194F
05/04 00:24, 194F
好多人有這問題啊,
因為不是騎迷啊,之前關注的不多,
TT也還不是全明星級別的球員,這很正常吧?
還是要全聯盟每個球員擅長什麼都如數家珍才能討論?
※ 編輯: roger29 (111.250.186.109), 05/04/2016 00:30:54
推
05/04 02:26, , 195F
05/04 02:26, 195F
推
05/04 07:01, , 196F
05/04 07:01, 196F
推
05/04 09:04, , 197F
05/04 09:04, 197F
推
05/04 11:06, , 198F
05/04 11:06, 198F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):