[討論]今年咖哩和湖人歐肥誰給對手防守壓力較大?
看板NBA作者georgecclin (georgecclin)時間8年前 (2016/02/26 21:43)推噓89(100推 11噓 67→)留言178則, 117人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
場均比一比
湖人歐肥99-00:
29.7分,13.6籃板,3.8助攻,FG%.574
咖哩15-16至今55場:
30.4分,5.3籃板,6.7助攻,FG%.513,3P%.461
湖人時期歐肥對手每場都要動用包夾或好幾人犯規,
一包夾歐肥又會分球給射手,還有年輕時的老大幫忙。
咖哩則是從中場就要開始防守,能投能切,
包夾還能助攻給隊友,陣中一票射手更猛。
這兩人誰在比賽中帶給對手的防守壓力比較大?
大家覺得呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.133.97.31
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1456494199.A.9CF.html
推
02/26 21:45, , 1F
02/26 21:45, 1F
→
02/26 21:45, , 2F
02/26 21:45, 2F
推
02/26 21:46, , 3F
02/26 21:46, 3F
→
02/26 21:46, , 4F
02/26 21:46, 4F
※ 編輯: georgecclin (220.133.97.31), 02/26/2016 21:46:34
推
02/26 21:47, , 5F
02/26 21:47, 5F
推
02/26 21:47, , 6F
02/26 21:47, 6F
→
02/26 21:48, , 7F
02/26 21:48, 7F
→
02/26 21:48, , 8F
02/26 21:48, 8F
推
02/26 21:49, , 9F
02/26 21:49, 9F
推
02/26 21:50, , 10F
02/26 21:50, 10F
推
02/26 21:52, , 11F
02/26 21:52, 11F
噓
02/26 21:53, , 12F
02/26 21:53, 12F
推
02/26 21:56, , 13F
02/26 21:56, 13F
→
02/26 21:56, , 14F
02/26 21:56, 14F
→
02/26 21:57, , 15F
02/26 21:57, 15F
→
02/26 21:57, , 16F
02/26 21:57, 16F
→
02/26 21:57, , 17F
02/26 21:57, 17F
推
02/26 22:02, , 18F
02/26 22:02, 18F
推
02/26 22:03, , 19F
02/26 22:03, 19F
→
02/26 22:03, , 20F
02/26 22:03, 20F
→
02/26 22:03, , 21F
02/26 22:03, 21F
推
02/26 22:03, , 22F
02/26 22:03, 22F
推
02/26 22:05, , 23F
02/26 22:05, 23F
→
02/26 22:05, , 24F
02/26 22:05, 24F
推
02/26 22:05, , 25F
02/26 22:05, 25F
→
02/26 22:06, , 26F
02/26 22:06, 26F
→
02/26 22:07, , 27F
02/26 22:07, 27F
推
02/26 22:08, , 28F
02/26 22:08, 28F
→
02/26 22:09, , 29F
02/26 22:09, 29F
推
02/26 22:10, , 30F
02/26 22:10, 30F
→
02/26 22:10, , 31F
02/26 22:10, 31F
推
02/26 22:10, , 32F
02/26 22:10, 32F
→
02/26 22:10, , 33F
02/26 22:10, 33F
推
02/26 22:12, , 34F
02/26 22:12, 34F
推
02/26 22:12, , 35F
02/26 22:12, 35F
推
02/26 22:15, , 36F
02/26 22:15, 36F
推
02/26 22:16, , 37F
02/26 22:16, 37F
→
02/26 22:16, , 38F
02/26 22:16, 38F
還有 100 則推文
噓
02/27 03:39, , 139F
02/27 03:39, 139F
→
02/27 03:39, , 140F
02/27 03:39, 140F
→
02/27 04:19, , 141F
02/27 04:19, 141F
→
02/27 04:19, , 142F
02/27 04:19, 142F
推
02/27 05:06, , 143F
02/27 05:06, 143F
推
02/27 06:28, , 144F
02/27 06:28, 144F
噓
02/27 07:06, , 145F
02/27 07:06, 145F
噓
02/27 07:40, , 146F
02/27 07:40, 146F
→
02/27 07:42, , 147F
02/27 07:42, 147F
推
02/27 07:43, , 148F
02/27 07:43, 148F
推
02/27 07:52, , 149F
02/27 07:52, 149F
推
02/27 07:54, , 150F
02/27 07:54, 150F
推
02/27 08:02, , 151F
02/27 08:02, 151F
推
02/27 08:08, , 152F
02/27 08:08, 152F
→
02/27 08:08, , 153F
02/27 08:08, 153F
→
02/27 08:08, , 154F
02/27 08:08, 154F
→
02/27 08:12, , 155F
02/27 08:12, 155F
→
02/27 08:12, , 156F
02/27 08:12, 156F
推
02/27 09:37, , 157F
02/27 09:37, 157F
推
02/27 10:21, , 158F
02/27 10:21, 158F
→
02/27 10:21, , 159F
02/27 10:21, 159F
推
02/27 12:53, , 160F
02/27 12:53, 160F
推
02/27 12:57, , 161F
02/27 12:57, 161F
→
02/27 12:57, , 162F
02/27 12:57, 162F
→
02/27 13:38, , 163F
02/27 13:38, 163F
→
02/27 13:39, , 164F
02/27 13:39, 164F
→
02/27 13:40, , 165F
02/27 13:40, 165F
→
02/27 13:40, , 166F
02/27 13:40, 166F
推
02/27 13:48, , 167F
02/27 13:48, 167F
→
02/27 13:49, , 168F
02/27 13:49, 168F
推
02/27 14:43, , 169F
02/27 14:43, 169F
推
02/27 14:48, , 170F
02/27 14:48, 170F
推
02/27 14:53, , 171F
02/27 14:53, 171F
→
02/27 14:53, , 172F
02/27 14:53, 172F
推
02/27 18:34, , 173F
02/27 18:34, 173F
推
02/27 19:40, , 174F
02/27 19:40, 174F
推
02/27 19:57, , 175F
02/27 19:57, 175F
推
02/27 20:08, , 176F
02/27 20:08, 176F
推
02/27 22:21, , 177F
02/27 22:21, 177F
推
02/27 22:32, , 178F
02/27 22:32, 178F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):