Re: [討論] 其實覺得LOVE一點也不強
原文恕刪,大家都知道LBJ報團組三巨頭兩次
兩次都是 "LBJ+得分型後衛+投藍能力強大前鋒"
其中LOVE所對應的角色就是BOSH,兩個轉隊前都是球隊一哥
我們先複習一下BOSH轉隊前是有多猛
BOSH在多倫多時,有兩個球季打進季後賽分別為
06-07及07-08球季,這兩個球季BOSH都是球隊一哥
複習一下陣容。
06-07 BOSH
東區第三 Anthony Parker
T.J. Ford
Jorge Garbajosa
Rasho Nesterovic
07-08 BOSH
東區第六 Anthony Parker
Jose Calderon
Jamario Moon
Carlos Delfino
06-07靠著搭配FORD就能打到東區第三,07-08雖然
calderon跟屌飛龍,但這兩支防守並不優秀,其他
角色可能連合格綠葉都算不上。總之,看完這陣容
要說BOSH把暴龍帶進季後賽,我想沒人會反隊。
而且那幾年BOSH隨便都20分10籃板,數據上沒輸LOVE
多少。
反觀LOVE這幾年身邊有推土機Pekovic、金童RUBIO
kevin Martin、大鎖Brewer等等。不敢說陣容豪華
多少,但真的沒比較差,卻連第八名都爭不到,就
知道LOVE真的不是當球隊核心的料。現在轉到騎士
隊發現他連要轉型當球隊第二人或第三人也有困難。
從籃球智商來看,BOSH會演又可以轉換角色
從心理強度來看,BOSH能挺身而出把球隊帶進季後賽
從球技數據來看,兩邊在一哥時也是伯仲之間
結論 BOSH>LOVE
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.24.6
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1428070363.A.382.html
※ 編輯: astu85008 (223.136.24.6), 04/03/2015 22:14:01
推
04/03 22:16, , 1F
04/03 22:16, 1F
推
04/03 22:16, , 2F
04/03 22:16, 2F
推
04/03 22:17, , 3F
04/03 22:17, 3F
西強東弱完全同意,06-07年東區老八勝率為0.488 西區老八為0.512
確實是西區強,但沒強到西老八勝率贏東老三
噓
04/03 22:17, , 4F
04/03 22:17, 4F
推
04/03 22:17, , 5F
04/03 22:17, 5F
推
04/03 22:17, , 6F
04/03 22:17, 6F
推
04/03 22:19, , 7F
04/03 22:19, 7F
推
04/03 22:19, , 8F
04/03 22:19, 8F
→
04/03 22:20, , 9F
04/03 22:20, 9F
推
04/03 22:21, , 10F
04/03 22:21, 10F
噓
04/03 22:27, , 11F
04/03 22:27, 11F
噓
04/03 22:27, , 12F
04/03 22:27, 12F
→
04/03 22:29, , 13F
04/03 22:29, 13F
→
04/03 22:29, , 14F
04/03 22:29, 14F
噓
04/03 22:33, , 15F
04/03 22:33, 15F
→
04/03 22:34, , 16F
04/03 22:34, 16F
推
04/03 22:34, , 17F
04/03 22:34, 17F
推
04/03 22:40, , 18F
04/03 22:40, 18F
※ 編輯: astu85008 (223.136.24.6), 04/03/2015 22:44:45
推
04/03 22:42, , 19F
04/03 22:42, 19F
推
04/03 22:44, , 20F
04/03 22:44, 20F
→
04/03 22:44, , 21F
04/03 22:44, 21F
推
04/03 22:47, , 22F
04/03 22:47, 22F
→
04/03 22:47, , 23F
04/03 22:47, 23F
推
04/03 22:49, , 24F
04/03 22:49, 24F
→
04/03 22:50, , 25F
04/03 22:50, 25F
推
04/03 22:58, , 26F
04/03 22:58, 26F
推
04/03 22:59, , 27F
04/03 22:59, 27F
推
04/03 22:59, , 28F
04/03 22:59, 28F
推
04/03 22:59, , 29F
04/03 22:59, 29F
噓
04/03 23:03, , 30F
04/03 23:03, 30F
噓
04/03 23:05, , 31F
04/03 23:05, 31F
→
04/03 23:07, , 32F
04/03 23:07, 32F
→
04/03 23:13, , 33F
04/03 23:13, 33F
推
04/03 23:16, , 34F
04/03 23:16, 34F
噓
04/03 23:22, , 35F
04/03 23:22, 35F
→
04/03 23:23, , 36F
04/03 23:23, 36F
→
04/03 23:23, , 37F
04/03 23:23, 37F
噓
04/03 23:27, , 38F
04/03 23:27, 38F
→
04/03 23:30, , 39F
04/03 23:30, 39F
噓
04/03 23:31, , 40F
04/03 23:31, 40F
→
04/03 23:31, , 41F
04/03 23:31, 41F
→
04/03 23:32, , 42F
04/03 23:32, 42F
→
04/03 23:37, , 43F
04/03 23:37, 43F
推
04/03 23:39, , 44F
04/03 23:39, 44F
推
04/03 23:58, , 45F
04/03 23:58, 45F
→
04/03 23:59, , 46F
04/03 23:59, 46F
推
04/04 00:00, , 47F
04/04 00:00, 47F
推
04/04 00:06, , 48F
04/04 00:06, 48F
→
04/04 00:20, , 49F
04/04 00:20, 49F
推
04/04 00:38, , 50F
04/04 00:38, 50F
→
04/04 00:39, , 51F
04/04 00:39, 51F
推
04/04 00:56, , 52F
04/04 00:56, 52F
→
04/04 00:56, , 53F
04/04 00:56, 53F
推
04/04 00:57, , 54F
04/04 00:57, 54F
推
04/04 01:11, , 55F
04/04 01:11, 55F
→
04/04 01:12, , 56F
04/04 01:12, 56F
推
04/04 01:19, , 57F
04/04 01:19, 57F
噓
04/04 01:38, , 58F
04/04 01:38, 58F
→
04/04 01:48, , 59F
04/04 01:48, 59F
噓
04/04 02:05, , 60F
04/04 02:05, 60F
推
04/04 02:08, , 61F
04/04 02:08, 61F
推
04/04 02:11, , 62F
04/04 02:11, 62F
→
04/04 02:11, , 63F
04/04 02:11, 63F
噓
04/04 02:16, , 64F
04/04 02:16, 64F
→
04/04 02:16, , 65F
04/04 02:16, 65F
推
04/04 04:16, , 66F
04/04 04:16, 66F
推
04/04 04:50, , 67F
04/04 04:50, 67F
→
04/04 04:50, , 68F
04/04 04:50, 68F
→
04/04 04:51, , 69F
04/04 04:51, 69F
→
04/04 05:21, , 70F
04/04 05:21, 70F
噓
04/04 08:06, , 71F
04/04 08:06, 71F
推
04/04 09:37, , 72F
04/04 09:37, 72F
推
04/04 10:25, , 73F
04/04 10:25, 73F
推
04/04 11:13, , 74F
04/04 11:13, 74F
推
04/04 11:25, , 75F
04/04 11:25, 75F
推
04/04 12:52, , 76F
04/04 12:52, 76F
→
04/04 12:52, , 77F
04/04 12:52, 77F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
討論
50
162