[外絮] LANCE STEPHENSON <-> KOBE?
We can dream, right? Do so, because this Lance Stephenson for Kobe Bryant
trade scenario is interesting. Most of all, it makes sense on both sides for
the Hornets and Lakers.
我們可以作夢對吧 做吧 因為這個交易實在是太逗趣了
最重要的事 這對黃蜂和湖人都很實際
So, Michael Jordan, how is that Lance Stephenson signing working out for you?
所以 JORDAN阿 簽下STEPHENSON為你解決了什麼?
Asking that question to His Airness would put you in an awkward state, but
the Charlotte Hornets definitely aren’t getting much from their big free
agent acquisition, who enters Wednesday’s play shooting .367 from the field
and a .182 mark from 3-point range that screams “Brick Layer!” That’s not
what the 4-14 Hornets were expecting when they signed Stephenson to a
two-year, $18 million deal this summer.
問到這個問題是會讓你很尷尬的(作者暗酸吹氣事件)
但是黃蜂絕對沒從得到STEPHENSON上獲得許多好處
他到星期三為止只繳出了.367的 FG 還有.182的3分球命中率
鋪磚塊的人!(暗酸打鐵) 那不是4-14的黃蜂會想要看到的
當今年夏天他們用2年18M簽下他的時候
Granted, the Hornets couldn’t move Stephenson until December 15, but once
that date arrives, the guys from sportsgrid,com came up with one heck of a
trade suggestion:
黃蜂在12/15之後就可以動他了
一些在SPORTSGRID.COM的人想出了這個交易方案
Move Stephenson to the Los Angeles Lakers for one Kobe Bean Bryant.
把STEPHENSON拿去換KOBE回來吧
The Mamba in something other than a Lakers uniform? Blasphemy, you say. Hold
on, though, because the scenario makes more sense than it appears.
讓黑曼巴穿別隊制服? 這是汙辱吧 你說
等下 因為這好像越來越合理了
Adding Stephenson gives the Lakers a young scorer (OK, a young scorer once he
finds his range) while freeing up $16 million off the salary cap. Desperation
could also lead the Lakers to at least one of the Hornets’ six first round
picks through 2020, which likely would be of the lottery variety.
STEPHENSON可以給湖人一個年輕的得分者(OK 一個曾經找的到籃框的年輕得分者)
而且可以騰出16M的薪資空間
他們也可以拿到黃蜂隊到2020年以前的6個第一輪選秀權的至少一個
Kobe to the Hornets would give them an elite scorer who’d match up well with
big man Al Jefferson, but it’s the financial aspect that works best for
Charlotte, which could end up with the massive contracts of both Bryant and
Jefferson off the books in 2016 (“Hi, can I talk with Kevin Durant?”).
KOBE到黃蜂之後也會是一個頂尖的得分者
他會與長人AL JEFFERSON配對良好
但是這在財務方面也能讓黃蜂運作良好
KOBE和JEFFERSON的合約都在2016結束
(HI 請問杜蘭特在嘛)
Doubtful? Yes? Does it make sense? Yes.
Stay tuned….
懷疑嗎 對 這合理嗎 沒錯
讓我們繼續看下去....
SOURCE:http://ppt.cc/jzBk
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.60.125.70
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1418052721.A.69D.html
噓
12/08 23:33, , 1F
12/08 23:33, 1F
※ 編輯: buichcmu (42.60.125.70), 12/08/2014 23:33:19
推
12/08 23:33, , 2F
12/08 23:33, 2F
→
12/08 23:33, , 3F
12/08 23:33, 3F
推
12/08 23:33, , 4F
12/08 23:33, 4F
→
12/08 23:33, , 5F
12/08 23:33, 5F
※ 編輯: buichcmu (42.60.125.70), 12/08/2014 23:34:10
→
12/08 23:33, , 6F
12/08 23:33, 6F
推
12/08 23:36, , 7F
12/08 23:36, 7F
推
12/08 23:37, , 8F
12/08 23:37, 8F
推
12/08 23:37, , 9F
12/08 23:37, 9F
→
12/08 23:37, , 10F
12/08 23:37, 10F
噓
12/08 23:37, , 11F
12/08 23:37, 11F
推
12/08 23:38, , 12F
12/08 23:38, 12F
→
12/08 23:38, , 13F
12/08 23:38, 13F
推
12/08 23:39, , 14F
12/08 23:39, 14F
推
12/08 23:40, , 15F
12/08 23:40, 15F
→
12/08 23:40, , 16F
12/08 23:40, 16F
推
12/08 23:41, , 17F
12/08 23:41, 17F
推
12/08 23:43, , 18F
12/08 23:43, 18F
推
12/08 23:45, , 19F
12/08 23:45, 19F
推
12/08 23:45, , 20F
12/08 23:45, 20F
推
12/08 23:45, , 21F
12/08 23:45, 21F
推
12/08 23:46, , 22F
12/08 23:46, 22F
推
12/08 23:46, , 23F
12/08 23:46, 23F
推
12/08 23:47, , 24F
12/08 23:47, 24F
推
12/08 23:47, , 25F
12/08 23:47, 25F
→
12/08 23:47, , 26F
12/08 23:47, 26F
噓
12/08 23:48, , 27F
12/08 23:48, 27F
推
12/08 23:49, , 28F
12/08 23:49, 28F
推
12/08 23:51, , 29F
12/08 23:51, 29F
推
12/08 23:53, , 30F
12/08 23:53, 30F
推
12/08 23:53, , 31F
12/08 23:53, 31F
推
12/08 23:58, , 32F
12/08 23:58, 32F
推
12/08 23:58, , 33F
12/08 23:58, 33F
推
12/09 00:02, , 34F
12/09 00:02, 34F
噓
12/09 00:04, , 35F
12/09 00:04, 35F
→
12/09 00:04, , 36F
12/09 00:04, 36F
推
12/09 00:07, , 37F
12/09 00:07, 37F
推
12/09 00:07, , 38F
12/09 00:07, 38F
噓
12/09 00:08, , 39F
12/09 00:08, 39F
推
12/09 00:08, , 40F
12/09 00:08, 40F
推
12/09 00:17, , 41F
12/09 00:17, 41F
推
12/09 00:23, , 42F
12/09 00:23, 42F
推
12/09 00:26, , 43F
12/09 00:26, 43F
噓
12/09 00:27, , 44F
12/09 00:27, 44F
推
12/09 00:49, , 45F
12/09 00:49, 45F
推
12/09 00:51, , 46F
12/09 00:51, 46F
→
12/09 01:00, , 47F
12/09 01:00, 47F
→
12/09 01:19, , 48F
12/09 01:19, 48F
噓
12/09 01:38, , 49F
12/09 01:38, 49F
推
12/09 02:33, , 50F
12/09 02:33, 50F
噓
12/09 02:34, , 51F
12/09 02:34, 51F
推
12/09 02:37, , 52F
12/09 02:37, 52F
推
12/09 04:16, , 53F
12/09 04:16, 53F
噓
12/09 06:05, , 54F
12/09 06:05, 54F
噓
12/09 06:22, , 55F
12/09 06:22, 55F
噓
12/09 06:27, , 56F
12/09 06:27, 56F
推
12/09 06:50, , 57F
12/09 06:50, 57F
噓
12/09 07:25, , 58F
12/09 07:25, 58F
推
12/09 08:20, , 59F
12/09 08:20, 59F
→
12/09 08:20, , 60F
12/09 08:20, 60F
推
12/09 08:39, , 61F
12/09 08:39, 61F
噓
12/09 11:01, , 62F
12/09 11:01, 62F
→
12/09 16:11, , 63F
12/09 16:11, 63F