[討論] 火箭傷兵不斷 為何戰績還是不錯
目前14勝4敗
可是隊上第二、第三、第五、第六得分點都因傷缺陣
未受傷前分別繳出數據如下:
G FG% 3P% FT% TRB AST STL BLK PTS PER
D.Howard 10 .575 .000 .462 11.3 1.3 0.8 2.3 18.8 20.2
T.Jones 4 .521 .429 .750 7.5 1.5 1.0 1.8 14.0 19.4
Beverley 7 .469 .465 .571 4.3 2.1 1.0 0.3 12.6 15.9
I.Canaan 9 .439 .431 .750 1.9 1.7 1.0 0.0 9.6 13.9
PER分別為目前火箭的第二到第五名
(平均13.7分的Ariza PER排第六)
缺陣名單中有DH、PB這兩個大鎖等級球員
只剩Ariza是比較擅長防守的球員
不過火箭卻也沒因此防守崩潰
倚賴三分球進攻的火箭隊
PB每場可投進2.9個(隊上第一),3P%全隊最高
Canaan每場貢獻2顆三分(隊上第四),3P%全隊次高
還有DH、Jones在禁區幫忙創造空間
照理說少了他們進攻應該會出現差池
但好像也沒預料中的嚴重
隊上主將數據
G FG% 3P% FT% TRB AST STL BLK PTS PER
Harden 18 .410 .342 .896 6.1 6.6 2.0 1.1 25.0 25.3
Ariza 18 .382 .354 .857 5.9 2.5 1.8 0.2 13.7 13.0
Kobe本季數據和Harden頗為類似
雖然比Harden差一點
但戰績卻是勝敗完全顛倒
究竟是什麼原因讓火箭可以在這麼多傷兵的情況下保持戰績?
是Harden、Ariza的實質影響力大於數據?
還是替補群其實還不錯?
又或者是McHale練兵、戰術有成,開始收割?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.164.168.236
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1417829194.A.0AD.html
推
12/06 09:27, , 1F
12/06 09:27, 1F
推
12/06 09:28, , 2F
12/06 09:28, 2F
推
12/06 09:31, , 3F
12/06 09:31, 3F
推
12/06 09:33, , 4F
12/06 09:33, 4F
推
12/06 09:33, , 5F
12/06 09:33, 5F
推
12/06 09:34, , 6F
12/06 09:34, 6F
→
12/06 09:34, , 7F
12/06 09:34, 7F
推
12/06 09:35, , 8F
12/06 09:35, 8F
→
12/06 09:36, , 9F
12/06 09:36, 9F
→
12/06 09:36, , 10F
12/06 09:36, 10F
噓
12/06 09:36, , 11F
12/06 09:36, 11F
推
12/06 09:36, , 12F
12/06 09:36, 12F
→
12/06 09:37, , 13F
12/06 09:37, 13F
推
12/06 09:38, , 14F
12/06 09:38, 14F
推
12/06 09:38, , 15F
12/06 09:38, 15F
→
12/06 09:38, , 16F
12/06 09:38, 16F
推
12/06 09:39, , 17F
12/06 09:39, 17F
推
12/06 09:39, , 18F
12/06 09:39, 18F
可是鬍子本季FGA17.2,生涯最高耶
→
12/06 09:39, , 19F
12/06 09:39, 19F
推
12/06 09:39, , 20F
12/06 09:39, 20F
推
12/06 09:40, , 21F
12/06 09:40, 21F
推
12/06 09:40, , 22F
12/06 09:40, 22F
→
12/06 09:40, , 23F
12/06 09:40, 23F
→
12/06 09:40, , 24F
12/06 09:40, 24F
推
12/06 09:40, , 25F
12/06 09:40, 25F
→
12/06 09:40, , 26F
12/06 09:40, 26F
→
12/06 09:40, , 27F
12/06 09:40, 27F
※ 編輯: cpks (218.164.168.236), 12/06/2014 09:41:12
→
12/06 09:40, , 28F
12/06 09:40, 28F
推
12/06 09:41, , 29F
12/06 09:41, 29F
推
12/06 09:41, , 30F
12/06 09:41, 30F
→
12/06 09:41, , 31F
12/06 09:41, 31F
推
12/06 09:43, , 32F
12/06 09:43, 32F
→
12/06 09:43, , 33F
12/06 09:43, 33F
推
12/06 09:44, , 34F
12/06 09:44, 34F
推
12/06 09:45, , 35F
12/06 09:45, 35F
推
12/06 09:45, , 36F
12/06 09:45, 36F
→
12/06 09:46, , 37F
12/06 09:46, 37F
還有 26 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
12/06 10:07, , 64F
12/06 10:07, 64F
推
12/06 10:07, , 65F
12/06 10:07, 65F
→
12/06 10:07, , 66F
12/06 10:07, 66F
→
12/06 10:07, , 67F
12/06 10:07, 67F
→
12/06 10:09, , 68F
12/06 10:09, 68F
不過從季前的角度,火箭讓出了Lin、Asik,CP被簽走,
依照當時風向,如果再有傷兵,火箭也是NGT
但現在靠Harden carry大家,穩打NGT賺勝場,也出乎很多人意料之外吧?
※ 編輯: cpks (218.164.168.236), 12/06/2014 10:13:05
→
12/06 10:09, , 69F
12/06 10:09, 69F
→
12/06 10:10, , 70F
12/06 10:10, 70F
→
12/06 10:11, , 71F
12/06 10:11, 71F
大大講解一下啊,不是每個人都看了比賽才來討論的
讓我們這些只看數據的增廣見聞一下
※ 編輯: cpks (218.164.168.236), 12/06/2014 10:16:01
推
12/06 10:13, , 72F
12/06 10:13, 72F
→
12/06 10:13, , 73F
12/06 10:13, 73F
→
12/06 10:14, , 74F
12/06 10:14, 74F
→
12/06 10:14, , 75F
12/06 10:14, 75F
→
12/06 10:14, , 76F
12/06 10:14, 76F
→
12/06 10:15, , 77F
12/06 10:15, 77F
→
12/06 10:15, , 78F
12/06 10:15, 78F
痾...創造空間不只inside out吧,而且幾乎沒聽過Howard是黑洞的說法
雖然現在比較少看火箭板,但相信這應該不是主流言論
噓
12/06 10:15, , 79F
12/06 10:15, 79F
推
12/06 10:16, , 80F
12/06 10:16, 80F
→
12/06 10:16, , 81F
12/06 10:16, 81F
→
12/06 10:16, , 82F
12/06 10:16, 82F
→
12/06 10:17, , 83F
12/06 10:17, 83F
→
12/06 10:17, , 84F
12/06 10:17, 84F
→
12/06 10:17, , 85F
12/06 10:17, 85F
→
12/06 10:18, , 86F
12/06 10:18, 86F
→
12/06 10:18, , 87F
12/06 10:18, 87F
※ 編輯: cpks (218.164.168.236), 12/06/2014 10:25:45
推
12/06 10:25, , 88F
12/06 10:25, 88F
推
12/06 10:28, , 89F
12/06 10:28, 89F
推
12/06 10:28, , 90F
12/06 10:28, 90F
→
12/06 10:28, , 91F
12/06 10:28, 91F
推
12/06 10:33, , 92F
12/06 10:33, 92F
推
12/06 10:39, , 93F
12/06 10:39, 93F
→
12/06 10:40, , 94F
12/06 10:40, 94F
推
12/06 10:46, , 95F
12/06 10:46, 95F
推
12/06 10:52, , 96F
12/06 10:52, 96F
推
12/06 11:14, , 97F
12/06 11:14, 97F
推
12/06 12:08, , 98F
12/06 12:08, 98F
推
12/06 23:56, , 99F
12/06 23:56, 99F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
41
99