Re: [外絮] 數字很清楚了:Beverly應當取代Lin先發已回收
※ 引述《imgkiller (無血之大戮)》之銘言:
: 這篇是美國火箭球迷最大討論區ClutchFans的站長Clutch寫的,一般認為有火箭官方背景
: The numbers are clear: Patrick Beverley deserves to start over Jeremy Lin
: 數字很清楚了:Beverly應當取代Lin先發
: http://tinyurl.com/l7d93cb
: 主要有兩個論點:
: 1.先發球員組合數據
: 跟林搭的時候,火箭與敵隊的平均得分差為 +4.0
: 跟Beverly搭的時候,則高達 +12.7
: 事實上,只考慮出賽200分鐘以上的球員,Beverly的這個一數據為全聯盟第三高
: http://tinyurl.com/nc29kgq
: 因為導球更好、籃板更好、投球更好、失誤更少 (Clutch原話)
好笑哩,火箭根本就沒設計林跟其他四人先發的戰術,練習也沒在一起練
場上林拿球其他四人不是看戲就是伸手要球單打,要單擋掩護空切策應全部沒有
這樣團隊數據當然不好看,這種玩法找什麼明星控衛來都數據都不會好太多
而且給林的定位大概每星期都在變,這樣比什麼數據有意義?
籃球有太多事情是數據無法呈現的,教練要搞一個球員時,再強的人數據都會下滑很多
為什麼一堆球員轉個隊就好像換個人一樣,就是因為這些原因
這些東西數據看到破頭也看不出所以然的
: 2.林書豪自己在替補時的表現比先發時更有效率
: 林的17場先發數據 命中率43.5%, 三分命中率 28.6% 場均13.9分 每場打 32.9分鐘
: 林替補時 48.9% 34.4% 12.6分 27.1分鐘
: http://tinyurl.com/lwvgykj <== CF今天最熱門的討論,是以這篇文章開展的
林主要先發就是前面十幾場,那十幾場除了其中一兩場以外
其他時間教練怎麼搞他的,場上其他四人怎樣完全無配合的
有看球的都知道,也只有這種鍵盤數據大師才會寫出這種廢文
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.196.98.32
推
01/22 11:58, , 1F
01/22 11:58, 1F
推
01/22 11:58, , 2F
01/22 11:58, 2F
推
01/22 11:58, , 3F
01/22 11:58, 3F
噓
01/22 11:58, , 4F
01/22 11:58, 4F
→
01/22 11:59, , 5F
01/22 11:59, 5F
→
01/22 11:59, , 6F
01/22 11:59, 6F
推
01/22 12:00, , 7F
01/22 12:00, 7F
→
01/22 12:00, , 8F
01/22 12:00, 8F
推
01/22 12:00, , 9F
01/22 12:00, 9F
→
01/22 12:01, , 10F
01/22 12:01, 10F
→
01/22 12:01, , 11F
01/22 12:01, 11F
→
01/22 12:01, , 12F
01/22 12:01, 12F
→
01/22 12:01, , 13F
01/22 12:01, 13F
→
01/22 12:01, , 14F
01/22 12:01, 14F
推
01/22 12:01, , 15F
01/22 12:01, 15F
→
01/22 12:01, , 16F
01/22 12:01, 16F
→
01/22 12:01, , 17F
01/22 12:01, 17F
推
01/22 12:01, , 18F
01/22 12:01, 18F
→
01/22 12:02, , 19F
01/22 12:02, 19F
→
01/22 12:02, , 20F
01/22 12:02, 20F
→
01/22 12:02, , 21F
01/22 12:02, 21F
推
01/22 12:02, , 22F
01/22 12:02, 22F
→
01/22 12:02, , 23F
01/22 12:02, 23F
→
01/22 12:02, , 24F
01/22 12:02, 24F
→
01/22 12:03, , 25F
01/22 12:03, 25F
→
01/22 12:03, , 26F
01/22 12:03, 26F
→
01/22 12:04, , 27F
01/22 12:04, 27F
推
01/22 12:04, , 28F
01/22 12:04, 28F
→
01/22 12:05, , 29F
01/22 12:05, 29F
→
01/22 12:05, , 30F
01/22 12:05, 30F
推
01/22 12:05, , 31F
01/22 12:05, 31F
推
01/22 12:05, , 32F
01/22 12:05, 32F
→
01/22 12:06, , 33F
01/22 12:06, 33F
→
01/22 12:06, , 34F
01/22 12:06, 34F
→
01/22 12:06, , 35F
01/22 12:06, 35F
→
01/22 12:06, , 36F
01/22 12:06, 36F
→
01/22 12:06, , 37F
01/22 12:06, 37F
→
01/22 12:07, , 38F
01/22 12:07, 38F
→
01/22 12:07, , 39F
01/22 12:07, 39F
還有 245 則推文
→
01/22 13:11, , 285F
01/22 13:11, 285F
推
01/22 13:13, , 286F
01/22 13:13, 286F
→
01/22 13:13, , 287F
01/22 13:13, 287F
→
01/22 13:13, , 288F
01/22 13:13, 288F
推
01/22 13:14, , 289F
01/22 13:14, 289F
推
01/22 13:16, , 290F
01/22 13:16, 290F
推
01/22 13:16, , 291F
01/22 13:16, 291F
→
01/22 13:17, , 292F
01/22 13:17, 292F
推
01/22 13:17, , 293F
01/22 13:17, 293F
→
01/22 13:17, , 294F
01/22 13:17, 294F
推
01/22 13:18, , 295F
01/22 13:18, 295F
→
01/22 13:18, , 296F
01/22 13:18, 296F
推
01/22 13:18, , 297F
01/22 13:18, 297F
→
01/22 13:19, , 298F
01/22 13:19, 298F
推
01/22 13:20, , 299F
01/22 13:20, 299F
→
01/22 13:20, , 300F
01/22 13:20, 300F
推
01/22 13:21, , 301F
01/22 13:21, 301F
→
01/22 13:22, , 302F
01/22 13:22, 302F
推
01/22 13:22, , 303F
01/22 13:22, 303F
→
01/22 13:26, , 304F
01/22 13:26, 304F
推
01/22 13:29, , 305F
01/22 13:29, 305F
噓
01/22 13:34, , 306F
01/22 13:34, 306F
→
01/22 13:34, , 307F
01/22 13:34, 307F
→
01/22 13:35, , 308F
01/22 13:35, 308F
推
01/22 13:36, , 309F
01/22 13:36, 309F
→
01/22 13:36, , 310F
01/22 13:36, 310F
推
01/22 13:43, , 311F
01/22 13:43, 311F
→
01/22 13:44, , 312F
01/22 13:44, 312F
推
01/22 13:45, , 313F
01/22 13:45, 313F
推
01/22 13:47, , 314F
01/22 13:47, 314F
推
01/22 13:49, , 315F
01/22 13:49, 315F
推
01/22 13:59, , 316F
01/22 13:59, 316F
推
01/22 14:10, , 317F
01/22 14:10, 317F
→
01/22 14:10, , 318F
01/22 14:10, 318F
噓
01/22 16:18, , 319F
01/22 16:18, 319F
推
01/22 19:06, , 320F
01/22 19:06, 320F
推
01/22 19:35, , 321F
01/22 19:35, 321F
→
01/22 22:28, , 322F
01/22 22:28, 322F
推
01/23 01:30, , 323F
01/23 01:30, 323F
→
01/23 12:51, , 324F
01/23 12:51, 324F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):