[討論] David West 和Carlos Boozer已回收
如題,這兩位球員大概都是在02 03年左右進入聯盟的
差別可能在於Boozer的籃球素養稍微好些,畢竟是K教練的學生
當初在爵士的時候場均都可以上雙被譽為Malone 2.0,
兩人身高都是6'9 體重都在250lb左右,不過Boozer肌肉比較發達一些,
都有不錯的中距離投射能力,West命中率稍低(0.491 vs 0.529),不過打法而言
West比較偏上中側應打進去or傳, Boozer上中側應後拿到球投掉的機率比較高,
低位的話West偏好背籃轉身放球, Boozer偏好後仰投籃,照這樣的邏輯而言
Boozer以投籃為主的打法應該命中率會比較差,但怎麼反應出來的成績卻非如此呢?
若純以籃板能力論的話兩人是有一定差距的
Boozer常常可以有12~15個的表現 場均也差不多有10個,
West 可能就7 8個上下 偶爾10~12個,
如果是教練的話,會比較偏好哪一種類型的球員呢?
還是說現在的聯盟生態6'9已經有點undersize了?所以分工明確下
PF已經不是得分的主力大概可以有個13pts/8reb就OK了?
討論一下兩人的特色還有不同處吧,單看背景資料的話感覺
是可以當一時瑜亮的,只是球隊定位不是一哥所以炒不太起來而已
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 146.151.112.191
推
06/04 13:49, , 1F
06/04 13:49, 1F
→
06/04 13:50, , 2F
06/04 13:50, 2F
推
06/04 13:50, , 3F
06/04 13:50, 3F
推
06/04 13:50, , 4F
06/04 13:50, 4F
推
06/04 13:50, , 5F
06/04 13:50, 5F
謝謝指正,我只看到6th沒有看到overall 34,不過Boozer出身於籃球名校,順位那麼低倒
令我意外
→
06/04 13:51, , 6F
06/04 13:51, 6F
→
06/04 13:51, , 7F
06/04 13:51, 7F
推
06/04 13:51, , 8F
06/04 13:51, 8F
※ 編輯: hochopin 來自: 146.151.112.191 (06/04 13:54)
→
06/04 13:51, , 9F
06/04 13:51, 9F
→
06/04 13:52, , 10F
06/04 13:52, 10F
推
06/04 13:52, , 11F
06/04 13:52, 11F
推
06/04 13:52, , 12F
06/04 13:52, 12F
推
06/04 13:52, , 13F
06/04 13:52, 13F
→
06/04 13:52, , 14F
06/04 13:52, 14F
→
06/04 13:53, , 15F
06/04 13:53, 15F
推
06/04 13:53, , 16F
06/04 13:53, 16F
→
06/04 13:53, , 17F
06/04 13:53, 17F
推
06/04 13:53, , 18F
06/04 13:53, 18F
→
06/04 13:53, , 19F
06/04 13:53, 19F
→
06/04 13:54, , 20F
06/04 13:54, 20F
推
06/04 13:54, , 21F
06/04 13:54, 21F
推
06/04 13:55, , 22F
06/04 13:55, 22F
我在Boozer大學時期就有注意他了,他天分真的不錯,很耐扛,只是Duke出品的球員一
般順位都不會太高,不然他身體素質真的在大學的時候就挺好
→
06/04 13:55, , 23F
06/04 13:55, 23F
→
06/04 13:55, , 24F
06/04 13:55, 24F
→
06/04 13:55, , 25F
06/04 13:55, 25F
※ 編輯: hochopin 來自: 146.151.112.191 (06/04 13:59)
→
06/04 13:55, , 26F
06/04 13:55, 26F
推
06/04 13:55, , 27F
06/04 13:55, 27F
推
06/04 13:55, , 28F
06/04 13:55, 28F
→
06/04 13:56, , 29F
06/04 13:56, 29F
推
06/04 13:56, , 30F
06/04 13:56, 30F
→
06/04 13:56, , 31F
06/04 13:56, 31F
→
06/04 13:57, , 32F
06/04 13:57, 32F
→
06/04 13:57, , 33F
06/04 13:57, 33F
→
06/04 13:57, , 34F
06/04 13:57, 34F
推
06/04 14:00, , 35F
06/04 14:00, 35F
推
06/04 14:00, , 36F
06/04 14:00, 36F
→
06/04 14:01, , 37F
06/04 14:01, 37F
→
06/04 14:02, , 38F
06/04 14:02, 38F
→
06/04 14:04, , 39F
06/04 14:04, 39F
推
06/04 14:05, , 40F
06/04 14:05, 40F
→
06/04 14:05, , 41F
06/04 14:05, 41F
→
06/04 14:05, , 42F
06/04 14:05, 42F
→
06/04 14:05, , 43F
06/04 14:05, 43F
推
06/04 14:06, , 44F
06/04 14:06, 44F
→
06/04 14:06, , 45F
06/04 14:06, 45F
推
06/04 14:07, , 46F
06/04 14:07, 46F
→
06/04 14:07, , 47F
06/04 14:07, 47F
→
06/04 14:07, , 48F
06/04 14:07, 48F
推
06/04 14:07, , 49F
06/04 14:07, 49F
推
06/04 14:09, , 50F
06/04 14:09, 50F
推
06/04 14:11, , 51F
06/04 14:11, 51F
→
06/04 14:12, , 52F
06/04 14:12, 52F
→
06/04 14:13, , 53F
06/04 14:13, 53F
→
06/04 14:14, , 54F
06/04 14:14, 54F
→
06/04 14:14, , 55F
06/04 14:14, 55F
→
06/04 14:15, , 56F
06/04 14:15, 56F
推
06/04 14:16, , 57F
06/04 14:16, 57F
→
06/04 14:16, , 58F
06/04 14:16, 58F
→
06/04 14:16, , 59F
06/04 14:16, 59F
推
06/04 14:17, , 60F
06/04 14:17, 60F
→
06/04 14:18, , 61F
06/04 14:18, 61F
→
06/04 14:18, , 62F
06/04 14:18, 62F
→
06/04 14:20, , 63F
06/04 14:20, 63F
→
06/04 14:21, , 64F
06/04 14:21, 64F
→
06/04 14:21, , 65F
06/04 14:21, 65F
→
06/04 14:22, , 66F
06/04 14:22, 66F
推
06/04 14:24, , 67F
06/04 14:24, 67F
推
06/04 14:37, , 68F
06/04 14:37, 68F
推
06/04 14:44, , 69F
06/04 14:44, 69F
→
06/04 14:47, , 70F
06/04 14:47, 70F
推
06/04 14:53, , 71F
06/04 14:53, 71F
推
06/04 15:16, , 72F
06/04 15:16, 72F
→
06/04 15:19, , 73F
06/04 15:19, 73F
推
06/04 15:56, , 74F
06/04 15:56, 74F
推
06/04 16:48, , 75F
06/04 16:48, 75F
→
06/04 16:49, , 76F
06/04 16:49, 76F
推
06/04 18:20, , 77F
06/04 18:20, 77F
→
06/04 18:21, , 78F
06/04 18:21, 78F
→
06/04 18:21, , 79F
06/04 18:21, 79F
推
06/04 19:25, , 80F
06/04 19:25, 80F
推
06/04 20:11, , 81F
06/04 20:11, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):