Re: [討論] 為什麼是杜蘭而不是哈登?已回收
我覺得檢討KD不如換個角度
為什麼當初不丟掉西河吧!
2011季後賽雷霆輸給小牛,我記得當時最大戰犯就是西河
太多濫投,而且組織也有很大問題,反觀哈登上場,雷霆進攻非常流暢,
外線導傳、內外線配合也多了一些
重點是西河持球過久,還有呆呆向前衝的打法,有時後會影響到KD,
反而讓KD有時後也找不到節奏
我印象中那時傳過不少交易西河然後扶正哈登的說法
我也認為這是雷霆更上層樓關鍵
但分水嶺應該是去年冠軍賽,哈登在重兵盯防的情況下打的一蹋糊塗,
如果KD無法發揮,當時哈登也找不到辦法,反而是西河這種不按牌理的打法,
能在熱火的嚴防中找到一些機會
加上西河的名氣比哈登大的多,最後球團還是選擇比較保守、爭議較小的做法
但我覺得,如果在場上的績效還有團隊意識、整體能力
KD大於哈登最後才是西河
特別是哈登今年的成長,外線穩定性的增加,從上一場對熱火的比賽就可以看出來
如果是他今年的狀態跟KD配合,我覺得雷霆可能更恐怖
至於最強SG跟第二強SF
我認為第二強SF還是勝過最強SG,況且看KD的命中率,績效值,
說他是第二也應該有些人不同意吧
※ 引述《soweina1 (XXX)》之銘言:
: 去年在雷霆有三把刀分屬不同位置PG、SG、SF
: PG一定要上先發組織全隊攻勢
: 另外就是SG、SF選一個先發,另一個板凳,讓火力能夠延續
: 本季哈登轉隊,就可以看到,哈登是目前NBA最強的SG,而杜蘭只能是第二強的SF
: 當初為什麼雷霆會選杜蘭先發、哈登坐板凳?
: 造就了杜蘭成了全明星,而哈登出不了頭,若不轉隊只能當永遠的第六人
: 雷霆教練當初若讓杜蘭從板凳出發,哈登早就是全明星,而杜蘭就是最佳第六人了吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.219.23.29
→
04/06 13:36, , 1F
04/06 13:36, 1F
推
04/06 13:37, , 2F
04/06 13:37, 2F
推
04/06 13:38, , 3F
04/06 13:38, 3F
推
04/06 13:40, , 4F
04/06 13:40, 4F
噓
04/06 13:42, , 5F
04/06 13:42, 5F
→
04/06 13:43, , 6F
04/06 13:43, 6F
→
04/06 13:43, , 7F
04/06 13:43, 7F
推
04/06 13:44, , 8F
04/06 13:44, 8F
→
04/06 13:44, , 9F
04/06 13:44, 9F
→
04/06 13:44, , 10F
04/06 13:44, 10F
推
04/06 13:45, , 11F
04/06 13:45, 11F
→
04/06 13:45, , 12F
04/06 13:45, 12F
→
04/06 13:45, , 13F
04/06 13:45, 13F
→
04/06 13:45, , 14F
04/06 13:45, 14F
推
04/06 13:48, , 15F
04/06 13:48, 15F
推
04/06 13:50, , 16F
04/06 13:50, 16F
→
04/06 13:51, , 17F
04/06 13:51, 17F
→
04/06 13:51, , 18F
04/06 13:51, 18F
→
04/06 13:52, , 19F
04/06 13:52, 19F
推
04/06 13:52, , 20F
04/06 13:52, 20F
推
04/06 13:53, , 21F
04/06 13:53, 21F
→
04/06 13:53, , 22F
04/06 13:53, 22F
→
04/06 13:53, , 23F
04/06 13:53, 23F
推
04/06 13:55, , 24F
04/06 13:55, 24F
→
04/06 13:56, , 25F
04/06 13:56, 25F
推
04/06 13:58, , 26F
04/06 13:58, 26F
→
04/06 13:59, , 27F
04/06 13:59, 27F
→
04/06 13:59, , 28F
04/06 13:59, 28F
→
04/06 14:01, , 29F
04/06 14:01, 29F
推
04/06 14:03, , 30F
04/06 14:03, 30F
→
04/06 14:04, , 31F
04/06 14:04, 31F
推
04/06 14:05, , 32F
04/06 14:05, 32F
噓
04/06 14:06, , 33F
04/06 14:06, 33F
推
04/06 14:06, , 34F
04/06 14:06, 34F
推
04/06 14:06, , 35F
04/06 14:06, 35F
→
04/06 14:07, , 36F
04/06 14:07, 36F
→
04/06 14:07, , 37F
04/06 14:07, 37F
→
04/06 14:09, , 38F
04/06 14:09, 38F
→
04/06 14:09, , 39F
04/06 14:09, 39F
推
04/06 14:10, , 40F
04/06 14:10, 40F
推
04/06 14:13, , 41F
04/06 14:13, 41F
→
04/06 14:15, , 42F
04/06 14:15, 42F
→
04/06 14:15, , 43F
04/06 14:15, 43F
推
04/06 14:15, , 44F
04/06 14:15, 44F
→
04/06 14:15, , 45F
04/06 14:15, 45F
推
04/06 14:19, , 46F
04/06 14:19, 46F
推
04/06 14:19, , 47F
04/06 14:19, 47F
→
04/06 14:20, , 48F
04/06 14:20, 48F
→
04/06 14:20, , 49F
04/06 14:20, 49F
→
04/06 14:22, , 50F
04/06 14:22, 50F
推
04/06 14:43, , 51F
04/06 14:43, 51F
噓
04/06 14:56, , 52F
04/06 14:56, 52F
→
04/06 15:02, , 53F
04/06 15:02, 53F
噓
04/06 15:22, , 54F
04/06 15:22, 54F
推
04/06 15:51, , 55F
04/06 15:51, 55F
推
04/06 16:02, , 56F
04/06 16:02, 56F
→
04/06 16:21, , 57F
04/06 16:21, 57F
推
04/06 17:55, , 58F
04/06 17:55, 58F
→
04/06 17:55, , 59F
04/06 17:55, 59F
推
04/06 18:09, , 60F
04/06 18:09, 60F
推
04/06 18:26, , 61F
04/06 18:26, 61F
→
04/06 18:26, , 62F
04/06 18:26, 62F
→
04/06 20:35, , 63F
04/06 20:35, 63F
→
04/06 20:35, , 64F
04/06 20:35, 64F
推
04/06 21:28, , 65F
04/06 21:28, 65F
→
04/06 21:28, , 66F
04/06 21:28, 66F
推
04/06 21:31, , 67F
04/06 21:31, 67F
推
04/06 21:44, , 68F
04/06 21:44, 68F
噓
04/07 00:53, , 69F
04/07 00:53, 69F
→
04/07 00:53, , 70F
04/07 00:53, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)