Re: [情報] Ric Bucher on Kevin McHale已回收
其實小弟一直有疑問 到底怎麼樣才算好教練?
單看火箭就好
09-10 42-40 西區第九 Adelman
10-11 43-39 西區第九 Adelman
11-12 34-32 西區第九 McHale
這三年主力陣容差不了多少
大家都公認Adelman是不錯的教練
而第一次完整執教的McHale成績卻也差不多?
再來 就有人說戰績好不代表教練好
可是疑問又來了 一般人對好教練的印象
不外乎從公車上拉人也能打進季後賽
或是帶領黃金陣容奪得總冠軍
能做到比陣容預估勝場更好 便是好教練
況且執教本來就是結果論 戰績才是一切
所以話說回來 McHale到底哪裡做錯了?
我看國外對他的教練生涯評價一直不錯啊....支持者比反對者要多
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 206.72.194.46
→
04/05 19:54, , 1F
04/05 19:54, 1F
→
04/05 19:55, , 2F
04/05 19:55, 2F
推
04/05 19:55, , 3F
04/05 19:55, 3F
→
04/05 19:56, , 4F
04/05 19:56, 4F
推
04/05 19:56, , 5F
04/05 19:56, 5F
→
04/05 19:56, , 6F
04/05 19:56, 6F
→
04/05 19:57, , 7F
04/05 19:57, 7F
→
04/05 19:57, , 8F
04/05 19:57, 8F
CF老版友大多都是支持McHale
火箭記者這兩年給他的評價也不差
※ 編輯: laogiby 來自: 206.72.194.46 (04/05 19:59)
推
04/05 19:58, , 9F
04/05 19:58, 9F
噓
04/05 19:58, , 10F
04/05 19:58, 10F
推
04/05 19:58, , 11F
04/05 19:58, 11F
→
04/05 19:59, , 12F
04/05 19:59, 12F
→
04/05 19:59, , 13F
04/05 19:59, 13F
推
04/05 20:00, , 14F
04/05 20:00, 14F
推
04/05 20:00, , 15F
04/05 20:00, 15F
→
04/05 20:01, , 16F
04/05 20:01, 16F
→
04/05 20:01, , 17F
04/05 20:01, 17F
→
04/05 20:02, , 18F
04/05 20:02, 18F
推
04/05 20:02, , 19F
04/05 20:02, 19F
→
04/05 20:03, , 20F
04/05 20:03, 20F
→
04/05 20:04, , 21F
04/05 20:04, 21F
噓
04/05 20:04, , 22F
04/05 20:04, 22F
推
04/05 20:04, , 23F
04/05 20:04, 23F
→
04/05 20:05, , 24F
04/05 20:05, 24F
→
04/05 20:05, , 25F
04/05 20:05, 25F
→
04/05 20:06, , 26F
04/05 20:06, 26F
→
04/05 20:06, , 27F
04/05 20:06, 27F
推
04/05 20:06, , 28F
04/05 20:06, 28F
→
04/05 20:07, , 29F
04/05 20:07, 29F
推
04/05 20:07, , 30F
04/05 20:07, 30F
→
04/05 20:07, , 31F
04/05 20:07, 31F
推
04/05 20:07, , 32F
04/05 20:07, 32F
噓
04/05 20:07, , 33F
04/05 20:07, 33F
→
04/05 20:08, , 34F
04/05 20:08, 34F
推
04/05 20:08, , 35F
04/05 20:08, 35F
→
04/05 20:08, , 36F
04/05 20:08, 36F
推
04/05 20:08, , 37F
04/05 20:08, 37F
推
04/05 20:08, , 38F
04/05 20:08, 38F
還有 166 則推文
推
04/05 20:39, , 205F
04/05 20:39, 205F
→
04/05 20:39, , 206F
04/05 20:39, 206F
→
04/05 20:39, , 207F
04/05 20:39, 207F
→
04/05 20:41, , 208F
04/05 20:41, 208F
推
04/05 20:41, , 209F
04/05 20:41, 209F
→
04/05 20:42, , 210F
04/05 20:42, 210F
推
04/05 20:42, , 211F
04/05 20:42, 211F
→
04/05 20:46, , 212F
04/05 20:46, 212F
推
04/05 20:49, , 213F
04/05 20:49, 213F
→
04/05 20:50, , 214F
04/05 20:50, 214F
推
04/05 20:53, , 215F
04/05 20:53, 215F
推
04/05 21:09, , 216F
04/05 21:09, 216F
→
04/05 21:10, , 217F
04/05 21:10, 217F
推
04/05 21:33, , 218F
04/05 21:33, 218F
→
04/05 21:34, , 219F
04/05 21:34, 219F
→
04/05 21:35, , 220F
04/05 21:35, 220F
推
04/05 21:36, , 221F
04/05 21:36, 221F
→
04/05 21:46, , 222F
04/05 21:46, 222F
推
04/05 21:50, , 223F
04/05 21:50, 223F
推
04/05 21:51, , 224F
04/05 21:51, 224F
推
04/05 21:53, , 225F
04/05 21:53, 225F
→
04/05 21:54, , 226F
04/05 21:54, 226F
→
04/05 21:54, , 227F
04/05 21:54, 227F
推
04/05 22:00, , 228F
04/05 22:00, 228F
→
04/05 22:04, , 229F
04/05 22:04, 229F
→
04/05 22:29, , 230F
04/05 22:29, 230F
→
04/05 22:32, , 231F
04/05 22:32, 231F
推
04/05 22:37, , 232F
04/05 22:37, 232F
推
04/05 22:40, , 233F
04/05 22:40, 233F
推
04/05 23:33, , 234F
04/05 23:33, 234F
→
04/05 23:33, , 235F
04/05 23:33, 235F
→
04/05 23:36, , 236F
04/05 23:36, 236F
→
04/05 23:37, , 237F
04/05 23:37, 237F
→
04/05 23:37, , 238F
04/05 23:37, 238F
→
04/05 23:38, , 239F
04/05 23:38, 239F
推
04/06 00:00, , 240F
04/06 00:00, 240F
推
04/06 00:15, , 241F
04/06 00:15, 241F
→
04/06 00:16, , 242F
04/06 00:16, 242F
推
04/06 01:52, , 243F
04/06 01:52, 243F
→
04/06 09:04, , 244F
04/06 09:04, 244F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 6 篇):