Re: [討論] Lin適合當老大已回收
我越來越不曉得控衛的控球是怎樣的了
以前我以為所謂的好控衛是要像Nash一樣,
看哪個隊友有空檔就把球妙傳給他得分
就是所謂的組織
不過後來又看到了Rondo的受傷導致塞爾提克戰績變好的事情
又讓我疑惑
所謂的組織應該是怎樣的呢?
又為什麼會有人說控球不等於組織呢?
像這季的火箭
林傳出的球常常都不是直接導致助攻的結果
更多時候火箭隊友會再把球傳個幾遍找到更好的出手點
那這樣子還能算是林組織球隊嗎?
那到底怎麼樣才算是優秀的控衛呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.187.19.24
→
03/31 23:49, , 1F
03/31 23:49, 1F
→
03/31 23:50, , 2F
03/31 23:50, 2F
推
03/31 23:52, , 3F
03/31 23:52, 3F
→
03/31 23:52, , 4F
03/31 23:52, 4F
→
03/31 23:54, , 5F
03/31 23:54, 5F
推
03/31 23:56, , 6F
03/31 23:56, 6F
推
03/31 23:56, , 7F
03/31 23:56, 7F
→
03/31 23:57, , 8F
03/31 23:57, 8F
→
03/31 23:57, , 9F
03/31 23:57, 9F
推
03/31 23:58, , 10F
03/31 23:58, 10F
→
03/31 23:58, , 11F
03/31 23:58, 11F
→
03/31 23:59, , 12F
03/31 23:59, 12F
→
03/31 23:59, , 13F
03/31 23:59, 13F
→
03/31 23:59, , 14F
03/31 23:59, 14F
→
04/01 00:00, , 15F
04/01 00:00, 15F
→
04/01 00:02, , 16F
04/01 00:02, 16F
推
04/01 00:03, , 17F
04/01 00:03, 17F
→
04/01 00:03, , 18F
04/01 00:03, 18F
→
04/01 00:03, , 19F
04/01 00:03, 19F
→
04/01 00:03, , 20F
04/01 00:03, 20F
噓
04/01 00:08, , 21F
04/01 00:08, 21F
推
04/01 00:10, , 22F
04/01 00:10, 22F
→
04/01 00:12, , 23F
04/01 00:12, 23F
噓
04/01 00:12, , 24F
04/01 00:12, 24F
推
04/01 00:14, , 25F
04/01 00:14, 25F
噓
04/01 00:15, , 26F
04/01 00:15, 26F
噓
04/01 00:17, , 27F
04/01 00:17, 27F
噓
04/01 00:18, , 28F
04/01 00:18, 28F
噓
04/01 00:21, , 29F
04/01 00:21, 29F
推
04/01 00:22, , 30F
04/01 00:22, 30F
推
04/01 00:24, , 31F
04/01 00:24, 31F
噓
04/01 00:26, , 32F
04/01 00:26, 32F
推
04/01 00:27, , 33F
04/01 00:27, 33F
噓
04/01 00:29, , 34F
04/01 00:29, 34F
推
04/01 00:37, , 35F
04/01 00:37, 35F
噓
04/01 02:47, , 36F
04/01 02:47, 36F
噓
04/01 04:46, , 37F
04/01 04:46, 37F
噓
04/01 08:33, , 38F
04/01 08:33, 38F
噓
04/01 12:39, , 39F
04/01 12:39, 39F
噓
04/02 20:24, , 40F
04/02 20:24, 40F
→
04/04 14:44, , 41F
04/04 14:44, 41F
→
04/04 14:44, , 42F
04/04 14:44, 42F
討論串 (同標題文章)