Re: [討論] Kobe有統治過nba嗎?已回收
: 以這個標準來看待Kobe,得分王的那一年,球隊戰績沒什麼亮點,
: 要說得分如流水,命中率也不過4成5~6上下,更不用說SG獨幹分的
: 打法對於讓隊友融入團隊造成的化學效應極為有限。
你知道後衛要用45%以上命中率得到35分是多難的事嗎?
史上只有兩個人做到過:
87 Michael Jordan 37.1分 FG 48.2% FGA 27.8
88 Michael Jordan 35.0分 FG 53.5% FGA 24.4
06 Kobe Bryant 35.4分 FG 45.0% FGA 27.2
就這樣而已,並不是像你用輕描淡寫的語氣講的好像誰都能做到
至於你說化學效應極為有限?我列幾個陣容給你看就知
06/07湖人陣容大概長這樣:
Parker/Farmar
Kobe/Evans
Walton/George
Odom/Radmanovic
Kwame/Cook
這個陣容06拿45勝,07拿42勝,07碰到嚴重傷兵問題就先不提了
A.Miller/Boykins
Buckner/D.Johnson
Anthony/Kleiza
Martin/R.Evans/Najera
Camby/Elson
06金塊這陣容不錯吧?他們拿到西區第三種子,但是實際上44勝還比湖人少一勝
Stoudamire/Atkins
M.Miller/E.Jones
Gay/D.Jones
Gasol/Warrick
Swift
灰熊07陣容長這樣,應該也不會有人說這是比湖人差的陣容,實際上他們卻在西區墊底,
足足比湖人少20勝.
以上只是舉例,有興趣可以繼續去翻,但是我可以說當年湖人陣容在西區大概是倒數前三名,
聯盟可能是倒數七八名,結果他們可以打到西區第七進季後賽.這兩年Walton,Odom,Kwame
Mihm,Parker,Cook都打出他們生涯最佳或次佳的數據.
如果說帶領較差的陣容打出相對好的戰績,讓平均天份較少的隊友打出生涯新高,這樣不叫
做"讓隊友融入團隊,造成化學效應" 我不知道什麼算是?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.250.57.176
推
02/17 18:44, , 1F
02/17 18:44, 1F
→
02/17 18:45, , 2F
02/17 18:45, 2F
推
02/17 18:45, , 3F
02/17 18:45, 3F
推
02/17 18:46, , 4F
02/17 18:46, 4F
推
02/17 18:46, , 5F
02/17 18:46, 5F
推
02/17 18:47, , 6F
02/17 18:47, 6F
→
02/17 18:47, , 7F
02/17 18:47, 7F
推
02/17 18:48, , 8F
02/17 18:48, 8F
推
02/17 18:48, , 9F
02/17 18:48, 9F
推
02/17 18:49, , 10F
02/17 18:49, 10F
推
02/17 18:49, , 11F
02/17 18:49, 11F
推
02/17 18:50, , 12F
02/17 18:50, 12F
→
02/17 18:50, , 13F
02/17 18:50, 13F
→
02/17 18:50, , 14F
02/17 18:50, 14F
推
02/17 18:51, , 15F
02/17 18:51, 15F
→
02/17 18:51, , 16F
02/17 18:51, 16F
推
02/17 18:51, , 17F
02/17 18:51, 17F
→
02/17 18:52, , 18F
02/17 18:52, 18F
→
02/17 18:52, , 19F
02/17 18:52, 19F
→
02/17 18:52, , 20F
02/17 18:52, 20F
→
02/17 18:52, , 21F
02/17 18:52, 21F
推
02/17 18:52, , 22F
02/17 18:52, 22F
→
02/17 18:52, , 23F
02/17 18:52, 23F
推
02/17 18:53, , 24F
02/17 18:53, 24F
推
02/17 18:53, , 25F
02/17 18:53, 25F
噓
02/17 18:53, , 26F
02/17 18:53, 26F
推
02/17 18:53, , 27F
02/17 18:53, 27F
→
02/17 18:53, , 28F
02/17 18:53, 28F
推
02/17 18:54, , 29F
02/17 18:54, 29F
推
02/17 18:54, , 30F
02/17 18:54, 30F
→
02/17 18:54, , 31F
02/17 18:54, 31F
→
02/17 18:54, , 32F
02/17 18:54, 32F
推
02/17 18:55, , 33F
02/17 18:55, 33F
→
02/17 18:55, , 34F
02/17 18:55, 34F
→
02/17 18:55, , 35F
02/17 18:55, 35F
推
02/17 18:55, , 36F
02/17 18:55, 36F
→
02/17 18:55, , 37F
02/17 18:55, 37F
推
02/17 18:55, , 38F
02/17 18:55, 38F
→
02/17 18:55, , 39F
02/17 18:55, 39F
還有 235 則推文
噓
02/17 22:56, , 275F
02/17 22:56, 275F
推
02/17 23:18, , 276F
02/17 23:18, 276F
推
02/17 23:19, , 277F
02/17 23:19, 277F
噓
02/17 23:23, , 278F
02/17 23:23, 278F
→
02/17 23:24, , 279F
02/17 23:24, 279F
噓
02/17 23:29, , 280F
02/17 23:29, 280F
→
02/17 23:30, , 281F
02/17 23:30, 281F
推
02/17 23:50, , 282F
02/17 23:50, 282F
推
02/17 23:55, , 283F
02/17 23:55, 283F
→
02/17 23:55, , 284F
02/17 23:55, 284F
→
02/17 23:56, , 285F
02/17 23:56, 285F
噓
02/18 00:08, , 286F
02/18 00:08, 286F
→
02/18 00:09, , 287F
02/18 00:09, 287F
→
02/18 00:13, , 288F
02/18 00:13, 288F
→
02/18 00:16, , 289F
02/18 00:16, 289F
推
02/18 00:19, , 290F
02/18 00:19, 290F
→
02/18 00:23, , 291F
02/18 00:23, 291F
噓
02/18 00:23, , 292F
02/18 00:23, 292F
推
02/18 00:24, , 293F
02/18 00:24, 293F
噓
02/18 00:26, , 294F
02/18 00:26, 294F
→
02/18 00:28, , 295F
02/18 00:28, 295F
推
02/18 00:29, , 296F
02/18 00:29, 296F
→
02/18 00:30, , 297F
02/18 00:30, 297F
→
02/18 00:31, , 298F
02/18 00:31, 298F
推
02/18 01:02, , 299F
02/18 01:02, 299F
→
02/18 01:04, , 300F
02/18 01:04, 300F
推
02/18 01:05, , 301F
02/18 01:05, 301F
→
02/18 01:05, , 302F
02/18 01:05, 302F
→
02/18 01:05, , 303F
02/18 01:05, 303F
→
02/18 01:05, , 304F
02/18 01:05, 304F
→
02/18 01:07, , 305F
02/18 01:07, 305F
→
02/18 01:08, , 306F
02/18 01:08, 306F
噓
02/18 01:52, , 307F
02/18 01:52, 307F
→
02/18 01:53, , 308F
02/18 01:53, 308F
→
02/18 01:54, , 309F
02/18 01:54, 309F
噓
02/18 02:08, , 310F
02/18 02:08, 310F
→
02/18 07:37, , 311F
02/18 07:37, 311F
→
02/18 07:39, , 312F
02/18 07:39, 312F
噓
02/18 18:40, , 313F
02/18 18:40, 313F
推
02/18 19:04, , 314F
02/18 19:04, 314F
討論串 (同標題文章)