[新聞] 虧喬丹6枚 詹姆士:羅素有11冠已回收
http://ppt.cc/rRU4
虧喬丹6枚 詹姆士:羅素有11冠
2013年02月17日
【蔡裕隆╱綜合報導】熱火MVP球星詹姆士,昨天在明星週末記者會回應「籃球之神」喬
丹「以冠軍戒指論偉大」的評論,詹姆士說:「我不會只以冠軍戒數來衡量偉大,如果只
看冠軍戒數,羅素(Bill Russell)有11枚冠軍戒,是不是比喬丹6枚來得偉大?我並不會
這樣評斷!」
魔術強森力挺喬丹
詹姆士會回應喬丹,是因喬丹日前受訪被問到:「Kobe與詹姆士誰比較偉大?」喬丹回答
說:「我怎麼看都是5大於1!(意指Kobe有5枚冠軍戒,當然比只有1枚冠軍戒的詹姆士偉
大)」詹姆士除了不認同喬丹的看法外,還說:「我不在意別人怎麼看我,我只為我在乎
的人打球!」
喬丹這席發言則獲「魔術」強森(Magic Johnson)力挺表示:「喬丹所言甚是,答案太簡
單不過了!」強森還說:「詹姆士與喬丹1對1對決,喬丹打10場會全贏,喬丹是史上最偉
大1對1球員。」強森會這樣說,是順便回應詹姆士曾自詡史上最偉大1對1球員。
-----------------------
我記得自稱自己1對1最強的不是KOBE嗎?
LBJ有這樣說過嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.32.216.125
推
02/17 12:41, , 1F
02/17 12:41, 1F
推
02/17 12:42, , 2F
02/17 12:42, 2F
→
02/17 12:42, , 3F
02/17 12:42, 3F
推
02/17 12:43, , 4F
02/17 12:43, 4F
推
02/17 12:44, , 5F
02/17 12:44, 5F
噓
02/17 12:46, , 6F
02/17 12:46, 6F
→
02/17 12:47, , 7F
02/17 12:47, 7F
推
02/17 12:48, , 8F
02/17 12:48, 8F
推
02/17 12:49, , 9F
02/17 12:49, 9F
推
02/17 12:49, , 10F
02/17 12:49, 10F
→
02/17 12:50, , 11F
02/17 12:50, 11F
推
02/17 12:50, , 12F
02/17 12:50, 12F
→
02/17 12:50, , 13F
02/17 12:50, 13F
推
02/17 12:50, , 14F
02/17 12:50, 14F
推
02/17 12:50, , 15F
02/17 12:50, 15F
→
02/17 12:52, , 16F
02/17 12:52, 16F
推
02/17 12:52, , 17F
02/17 12:52, 17F
→
02/17 12:52, , 18F
02/17 12:52, 18F
→
02/17 12:53, , 19F
02/17 12:53, 19F
推
02/17 12:53, , 20F
02/17 12:53, 20F
推
02/17 12:53, , 21F
02/17 12:53, 21F
→
02/17 12:54, , 22F
02/17 12:54, 22F
→
02/17 12:54, , 23F
02/17 12:54, 23F
→
02/17 12:55, , 24F
02/17 12:55, 24F
→
02/17 12:55, , 25F
02/17 12:55, 25F
→
02/17 12:56, , 26F
02/17 12:56, 26F
推
02/17 12:56, , 27F
02/17 12:56, 27F
推
02/17 12:56, , 28F
02/17 12:56, 28F
→
02/17 12:57, , 29F
02/17 12:57, 29F
→
02/17 12:58, , 30F
02/17 12:58, 30F
噓
02/17 13:00, , 31F
02/17 13:00, 31F
推
02/17 13:00, , 32F
02/17 13:00, 32F
推
02/17 13:01, , 33F
02/17 13:01, 33F
→
02/17 13:01, , 34F
02/17 13:01, 34F
→
02/17 13:02, , 35F
02/17 13:02, 35F
→
02/17 13:02, , 36F
02/17 13:02, 36F
→
02/17 13:02, , 37F
02/17 13:02, 37F
→
02/17 13:03, , 38F
02/17 13:03, 38F
→
02/17 13:03, , 39F
02/17 13:03, 39F
→
02/17 13:04, , 40F
02/17 13:04, 40F
→
02/17 13:05, , 41F
02/17 13:05, 41F
→
02/17 13:05, , 42F
02/17 13:05, 42F
推
02/17 13:07, , 43F
02/17 13:07, 43F
→
02/17 13:11, , 44F
02/17 13:11, 44F
推
02/17 13:13, , 45F
02/17 13:13, 45F
推
02/17 13:16, , 46F
02/17 13:16, 46F
推
02/17 13:21, , 47F
02/17 13:21, 47F
噓
02/17 13:39, , 48F
02/17 13:39, 48F
噓
02/17 13:46, , 49F
02/17 13:46, 49F
推
02/17 13:47, , 50F
02/17 13:47, 50F
噓
02/17 13:56, , 51F
02/17 13:56, 51F
噓
02/17 14:12, , 52F
02/17 14:12, 52F
→
02/17 14:12, , 53F
02/17 14:12, 53F
推
02/17 14:16, , 54F
02/17 14:16, 54F
→
02/17 14:29, , 55F
02/17 14:29, 55F
→
02/17 14:31, , 56F
02/17 14:31, 56F
推
02/17 14:40, , 57F
02/17 14:40, 57F
噓
02/17 14:51, , 58F
02/17 14:51, 58F
推
02/17 14:58, , 59F
02/17 14:58, 59F
噓
02/17 15:02, , 60F
02/17 15:02, 60F
推
02/17 15:17, , 61F
02/17 15:17, 61F
噓
02/17 16:12, , 62F
02/17 16:12, 62F
推
02/17 16:47, , 63F
02/17 16:47, 63F
噓
02/17 16:47, , 64F
02/17 16:47, 64F
噓
02/17 16:49, , 65F
02/17 16:49, 65F
→
02/17 16:58, , 66F
02/17 16:58, 66F
推
02/17 16:58, , 67F
02/17 16:58, 67F
→
02/17 16:58, , 68F
02/17 16:58, 68F
→
02/17 16:59, , 69F
02/17 16:59, 69F
噓
02/17 18:05, , 70F
02/17 18:05, 70F
推
02/17 18:12, , 71F
02/17 18:12, 71F
推
02/17 18:24, , 72F
02/17 18:24, 72F
→
02/17 18:25, , 73F
02/17 18:25, 73F
推
02/17 18:25, , 74F
02/17 18:25, 74F
→
02/17 18:52, , 75F
02/17 18:52, 75F
噓
02/17 22:45, , 76F
02/17 22:45, 76F
推
12/28 14:40, , 77F
12/28 14:40, 77F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):