[討論] 大家覺得 telegram 有可能取代 LINE 嗎?
LINE 在台灣使用率非常高,但現在換機變得很麻煩
而且如果想在二台手機上同時使用 LINE 就必須 root 才行
看到版上有網友推薦 telegram,試用了之後發現非常好用
telegram 的版面很簡潔清爽,貼圖免費
裡面的許多設定都比 LINE 靈活
而且,同一個帳號可以直接同時在不同的手機和平板上使用
只是,儘管各方面都大勝 LINE
但周圍沒人用就完全無法發揮作用
我自己的通訊錄有幾百個聯絡人
卻只有二個朋友有註冊 telegram
其中一個似乎沒在用,所以其實只有一個朋友有在用
似乎大家習慣用 LINE 之後就很難再更改
不知大家覺得未來 telegram 在台灣有可能取代 LINE 嗎?
想聽聽看大家都意見,謝謝
-----
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.50.135
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1468155085.A.1E2.html
→
07/10 20:52, , 1F
07/10 20:52, 1F
→
07/10 20:52, , 2F
07/10 20:52, 2F
→
07/10 20:52, , 3F
07/10 20:52, 3F
推
07/10 20:54, , 4F
07/10 20:54, 4F
→
07/10 20:54, , 5F
07/10 20:54, 5F
推
07/10 20:54, , 6F
07/10 20:54, 6F
推
07/10 20:54, , 7F
07/10 20:54, 7F
→
07/10 20:54, , 8F
07/10 20:54, 8F
→
07/10 20:54, , 9F
07/10 20:54, 9F
→
07/10 20:56, , 10F
07/10 20:56, 10F
推
07/10 20:56, , 11F
07/10 20:56, 11F
→
07/10 20:57, , 12F
07/10 20:57, 12F
推
07/10 20:57, , 13F
07/10 20:57, 13F
→
07/10 20:58, , 14F
07/10 20:58, 14F
推
07/10 20:58, , 15F
07/10 20:58, 15F
推
07/10 20:58, , 16F
07/10 20:58, 16F
→
07/10 20:59, , 17F
07/10 20:59, 17F
推
07/10 21:01, , 18F
07/10 21:01, 18F
→
07/10 21:02, , 19F
07/10 21:02, 19F
推
07/10 21:02, , 20F
07/10 21:02, 20F
推
07/10 21:03, , 21F
07/10 21:03, 21F
→
07/10 21:03, , 22F
07/10 21:03, 22F
推
07/10 21:06, , 23F
07/10 21:06, 23F
→
07/10 21:09, , 24F
07/10 21:09, 24F
推
07/10 21:10, , 25F
07/10 21:10, 25F
推
07/10 21:10, , 26F
07/10 21:10, 26F
推
07/10 21:11, , 27F
07/10 21:11, 27F
→
07/10 21:12, , 28F
07/10 21:12, 28F
推
07/10 21:12, , 29F
07/10 21:12, 29F
推
07/10 21:12, , 30F
07/10 21:12, 30F
推
07/10 21:13, , 31F
07/10 21:13, 31F
→
07/10 21:13, , 32F
07/10 21:13, 32F
→
07/10 21:14, , 33F
07/10 21:14, 33F
推
07/10 21:14, , 34F
07/10 21:14, 34F
→
07/10 21:15, , 35F
07/10 21:15, 35F
→
07/10 21:15, , 36F
07/10 21:15, 36F
→
07/10 21:15, , 37F
07/10 21:15, 37F
推
07/10 21:19, , 38F
07/10 21:19, 38F
推
07/10 21:20, , 39F
07/10 21:20, 39F
還有 202 則推文
推
07/11 11:10, , 242F
07/11 11:10, 242F
→
07/11 11:10, , 243F
07/11 11:10, 243F
→
07/11 11:12, , 244F
07/11 11:12, 244F
→
07/11 11:12, , 245F
07/11 11:12, 245F
→
07/11 12:16, , 246F
07/11 12:16, 246F
→
07/11 12:35, , 247F
07/11 12:35, 247F
推
07/11 12:36, , 248F
07/11 12:36, 248F
→
07/11 12:36, , 249F
07/11 12:36, 249F
→
07/11 12:37, , 250F
07/11 12:37, 250F
→
07/11 12:38, , 251F
07/11 12:38, 251F
→
07/11 12:39, , 252F
07/11 12:39, 252F
推
07/11 12:44, , 253F
07/11 12:44, 253F
推
07/11 13:23, , 254F
07/11 13:23, 254F
推
07/11 13:49, , 255F
07/11 13:49, 255F
→
07/11 13:49, , 256F
07/11 13:49, 256F
推
07/11 13:50, , 257F
07/11 13:50, 257F
推
07/11 13:51, , 258F
07/11 13:51, 258F
→
07/11 13:53, , 259F
07/11 13:53, 259F
→
07/11 13:53, , 260F
07/11 13:53, 260F
→
07/11 13:53, , 261F
07/11 13:53, 261F
推
07/11 14:06, , 262F
07/11 14:06, 262F
推
07/11 15:33, , 263F
07/11 15:33, 263F
推
07/11 17:28, , 264F
07/11 17:28, 264F
→
07/11 17:29, , 265F
07/11 17:29, 265F
→
07/11 17:30, , 266F
07/11 17:30, 266F
→
07/11 17:31, , 267F
07/11 17:31, 267F
→
07/11 17:32, , 268F
07/11 17:32, 268F
→
07/11 17:34, , 269F
07/11 17:34, 269F
→
07/11 17:34, , 270F
07/11 17:34, 270F
推
07/11 18:32, , 271F
07/11 18:32, 271F
推
07/11 19:02, , 272F
07/11 19:02, 272F
推
07/11 20:58, , 273F
07/11 20:58, 273F
推
07/12 05:16, , 274F
07/12 05:16, 274F
→
07/12 05:16, , 275F
07/12 05:16, 275F
→
07/12 05:16, , 276F
07/12 05:16, 276F
→
07/12 05:19, , 277F
07/12 05:19, 277F
推
07/12 08:59, , 278F
07/12 08:59, 278F
→
07/12 08:59, , 279F
07/12 08:59, 279F
推
07/12 19:10, , 280F
07/12 19:10, 280F
推
07/20 16:35, , 281F
07/20 16:35, 281F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):