[問題] 三星Note 5真的不如Note 4 嗎?
今天去遠傳看了雙胞胎A8 & Note 5
http://i.imgur.com/pdoUR19.png

Note 5多了一隻筆,使用上跟編輯都方便很多,
功能也強大很多,比較傾心
我之前只有用過SONY跟iPhone
所以在試用的時候對他很多功能印象蠻深刻的
比如說照片上的簡報功能就蠻好,可以隨時update新知的
手機螢幕感應的部分也很敏感
捲動截圖、直播視訊等等的新功能還不錯
但回來在01上面做功課卻發現有版大說Note 5不如4
而且洋洋灑灑列了好多項改變,大部分都偏負評….
於是真的很猶豫啊
另外看了一下32G的資費方案
遠傳跟台哥大都是998吃到飽 手機14990
但看板上最近台哥大的IP好像連大陸會有問題,
中華資費又真的太貴了
我目前考慮以遠傳為下手目標
現在萬事具備只欠東風了
請問
一、各位大大使用Note 5的評價如何?跟Note 4的差異性在哪?
二、目前看遠傳這個方案內容蠻符合我的使用狀況,但有沒有更好的方案?
謝謝大家
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.160.168.76
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1441365362.A.0F4.html
→
09/04 19:17, , 1F
09/04 19:17, 1F
推
09/04 19:18, , 2F
09/04 19:18, 2F
→
09/04 19:18, , 3F
09/04 19:18, 3F
推
09/04 19:20, , 4F
09/04 19:20, 4F
→
09/04 19:21, , 5F
09/04 19:21, 5F
→
09/04 19:23, , 6F
09/04 19:23, 6F
推
09/04 19:29, , 7F
09/04 19:29, 7F
推
09/04 19:31, , 8F
09/04 19:31, 8F
推
09/04 19:35, , 9F
09/04 19:35, 9F
→
09/04 19:36, , 10F
09/04 19:36, 10F
推
09/04 19:41, , 11F
09/04 19:41, 11F
推
09/04 19:45, , 12F
09/04 19:45, 12F
推
09/04 19:48, , 13F
09/04 19:48, 13F
→
09/04 19:48, , 14F
09/04 19:48, 14F
→
09/04 19:48, , 15F
09/04 19:48, 15F
→
09/04 19:49, , 16F
09/04 19:49, 16F
→
09/04 19:50, , 17F
09/04 19:50, 17F
→
09/04 19:50, , 18F
09/04 19:50, 18F
→
09/04 19:51, , 19F
09/04 19:51, 19F
→
09/04 19:51, , 20F
09/04 19:51, 20F
推
09/04 19:51, , 21F
09/04 19:51, 21F
→
09/04 19:51, , 22F
09/04 19:51, 22F
→
09/04 19:51, , 23F
09/04 19:51, 23F
推
09/04 19:52, , 24F
09/04 19:52, 24F
推
09/04 20:01, , 25F
09/04 20:01, 25F
→
09/04 20:01, , 26F
09/04 20:01, 26F
→
09/04 20:02, , 27F
09/04 20:02, 27F
→
09/04 20:04, , 28F
09/04 20:04, 28F
推
09/04 20:04, , 29F
09/04 20:04, 29F
→
09/04 20:04, , 30F
09/04 20:04, 30F
推
09/04 20:08, , 31F
09/04 20:08, 31F
→
09/04 20:08, , 32F
09/04 20:08, 32F
推
09/04 20:10, , 33F
09/04 20:10, 33F
→
09/04 20:10, , 34F
09/04 20:10, 34F
推
09/04 20:14, , 35F
09/04 20:14, 35F
推
09/04 20:17, , 36F
09/04 20:17, 36F
→
09/04 20:17, , 37F
09/04 20:17, 37F
→
09/04 20:17, , 38F
09/04 20:17, 38F
推
09/04 20:24, , 39F
09/04 20:24, 39F
推
09/04 20:29, , 40F
09/04 20:29, 40F
→
09/04 20:29, , 41F
09/04 20:29, 41F
推
09/04 20:30, , 42F
09/04 20:30, 42F
→
09/04 20:31, , 43F
09/04 20:31, 43F
推
09/04 20:32, , 44F
09/04 20:32, 44F
→
09/04 20:33, , 45F
09/04 20:33, 45F
→
09/04 20:33, , 46F
09/04 20:33, 46F
→
09/04 20:33, , 47F
09/04 20:33, 47F
推
09/04 20:36, , 48F
09/04 20:36, 48F
→
09/04 20:37, , 49F
09/04 20:37, 49F
→
09/04 20:38, , 50F
09/04 20:38, 50F
推
09/04 20:44, , 51F
09/04 20:44, 51F
推
09/04 20:49, , 52F
09/04 20:49, 52F
噓
09/04 20:58, , 53F
09/04 20:58, 53F
→
09/04 20:59, , 54F
09/04 20:59, 54F
推
09/04 21:09, , 55F
09/04 21:09, 55F
→
09/04 21:09, , 56F
09/04 21:09, 56F
→
09/04 21:10, , 57F
09/04 21:10, 57F
→
09/04 21:10, , 58F
09/04 21:10, 58F
→
09/04 21:10, , 59F
09/04 21:10, 59F
→
09/04 21:11, , 60F
09/04 21:11, 60F
→
09/04 21:11, , 61F
09/04 21:11, 61F
→
09/04 21:11, , 62F
09/04 21:11, 62F
推
09/04 21:13, , 63F
09/04 21:13, 63F
推
09/04 21:36, , 64F
09/04 21:36, 64F
推
09/04 21:42, , 65F
09/04 21:42, 65F
→
09/04 21:55, , 66F
09/04 21:55, 66F
推
09/04 22:06, , 67F
09/04 22:06, 67F
推
09/04 22:20, , 68F
09/04 22:20, 68F
推
09/04 22:38, , 69F
09/04 22:38, 69F
→
09/04 22:38, , 70F
09/04 22:38, 70F
→
09/04 22:56, , 71F
09/04 22:56, 71F
推
09/04 23:13, , 72F
09/04 23:13, 72F
推
09/04 23:34, , 73F
09/04 23:34, 73F
推
09/04 23:43, , 74F
09/04 23:43, 74F
推
09/05 00:09, , 75F
09/05 00:09, 75F
推
09/05 00:13, , 76F
09/05 00:13, 76F
→
09/05 00:13, , 77F
09/05 00:13, 77F
推
09/05 00:26, , 78F
09/05 00:26, 78F
→
09/05 00:26, , 79F
09/05 00:26, 79F
推
09/05 11:53, , 80F
09/05 11:53, 80F
→
09/05 11:55, , 81F
09/05 11:55, 81F
→
09/05 11:55, , 82F
09/05 11:55, 82F
→
09/05 18:27, , 83F
09/05 18:27, 83F
→
09/05 18:27, , 84F
09/05 18:27, 84F
→
09/05 18:28, , 85F
09/05 18:28, 85F
→
09/05 18:28, , 86F
09/05 18:28, 86F
推
09/05 23:21, , 87F
09/05 23:21, 87F
→
09/05 23:21, , 88F
09/05 23:21, 88F
推
09/10 13:54, , 89F
09/10 13:54, 89F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):